Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
Could we just add some sort of mail filter rule that forces a
Reply-To: to be set, and either adds Reply-To: debian-devel or returns
the mail to the sender with an explanation if none
Please can I encourage anyone posting to -devel-announce to ensure
that they have set the Reply-To: field to something sensible, and to
encourage anyone replying to a -devel-announce posting to check where
they are sending their reply. (Hint: -devel-announce is usually not
appropriate!)
This is m
Hi,
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> The following doesn't work, I must have missed something obvious.
[snip]
Try:
deb http://pandora.debian.org potato/non-US main contrib non-free
It Works For Me(tm).
Cheers,
Joost
On 11/05, Guy Maor wrote:
| Because nonus is now divided into main, non-free, and contrib, you
| must specify this in the distribution or section, just as you do for
| an upload to master.
What should be put in sources.list files?
The following doesn't work, I must have missed something obvious.
Many of you are confused because you are getting messages that your
packages are new when they really aren't, or perhaps dinstall is
rejecting them because it can't find the orig.tar.gz.
Because nonus is now divided into main, non-free, and contrib, you
must specify this in the distribution or sec
5 matches
Mail list logo
