On Wed 07 Apr 1999, Buddha Buck wrote:
I think Bruce Perens gave a good definition earlier...
1) easily reproduceable
2) instantly recognisable
3) iconic (i.e., not language dependent)
I've been watching all the discussions about this, and increasingly think
we're not looking for a
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Why are we discussing this on debian-devel-ANNOUNCE?
Because debian-devel-announce doesn't set an automatic
reply-to: debian-devel in the style of comp.os.linux.announce setting
the followups to col.misc and no one notices /
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Wichert Akkerman - Debian project leader wrote:
* jeanette (ants)
Concept: Debian is a lot of people working together to produce some
great things, just like ants.
Pros: strong imagery, official and liberal logo with the same theme
but still different.
Cons: official
On Apr 07, Wichert Akkerman - Debian project leader decided to present us with:
* raul (swirl)
Concept: magic being release from a genie bottle.
Pros: simple, good associations, already in a good format (EPS)
Cons: none :)
If we choose to have a single logo, then perhaps this becomes
two
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Adam Heath wrote:
sucks a few times
Thanks for that enlightening, reasoned comment. As a member of the logo
team I'm glad to see that you appreciate the amount of effort that has
gone into selecting those logos. What are you looking for in a logo
exactly?
Matthew
--
Elen
5 matches
Mail list logo
