Re: mips64el port build failed list

2013-10-16 Thread YunQiang Su
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:33 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: > >> We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good. > > Please add that to debian-ports.org so that maintainers can find > failed build logs linked from the PTS and wor

Bug#726482: ITP: lua-yaml -- LibYAML binding for Lua

2013-10-16 Thread Victor Seva
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Victor Seva * Package name: lua-yaml Version : 4 Upstream Author : Gary V. Vaughan * URL : https://github.com/gvvaughan/lyaml * License : Expat Programming Lang: Lua Description : LibYAML binding for Lua fast C

Bug#726488: ITP: ruby-commander -- Ruby command-line interface library

2013-10-16 Thread Youhei SASAKI
Package: wnpp Owner: Youhei SASAKI Severity: wishlist * Package name: ruby-commander Version : 4.1.5 Upstream Author : TJ Holowaychuk * URL or Web page : http://visionmedia.github.com/commander * License : MIT Description : Ruby command-line interface library "Comm

Re: mips64el port build failed list

2013-10-16 Thread YunQiang Su
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > hi! > > On 10/15/2013 03:59 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: The buildlog of these packages can be found in http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/ > > > Looking at one of my pet packages (gpsd): > > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencie

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:54:36 +0200, Dominik George wrote: >> Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner while >> downloading. > >Using a gateway anti-virus scanner for downloads from the Debian archive >seems a bit inappropriate, well, paranoid. Checking the signed has

Bug#726493: ITP: ruby-netconf -- Ruby GEM for device management using the NETCONF protocol as specified in RFC4741 and RFC6241

2013-10-16 Thread Sebastian Laubscher
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sebastian Laubscher * Package name: ruby-netconf Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Jeremy Schulman * URL : https://github.com/Juniper/net-netconf * License : BSD Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Ruby GEM for

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:19:38 +0200, "Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote: >I'm missing why the package cannot use the EICAR test virus signature for >its purposes. eicar.com does not have a distributable license. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -

Re: Debian XDG basedir compliance

2013-10-16 Thread Thomas Koch
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 06:52:41 AM Paul Wise wrote: > Good point. I've added a section on user home directories to the UG, > pointing out the XDG spec and the libraries that support it. > > https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#User_home_directories added a link to https://wiki.debian.org/X

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Marc Haber schrieb: >On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:19:38 +0200, "Thijs Kinkhorst" > wrote: >>I'm missing why the package cannot use the EICAR test virus signature >for >>its purposes. > >eicar.com does not have a distributable license. I do not think it

Re: Debian XDG basedir compliance

2013-10-16 Thread alberto fuentes
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > To add on to what Lars said, users still often use the same home directory > on multiple systems (via NFS, AFS, etc.) and expect, when running the same > application on different systems, for programs to find their configuration > files in the

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dominik George schrieb: >I do not think it is actually copyrightable software. It is a string >that was agreed in to trigger antivirus scanners, so it is more or less >a protocol. Consider the downloads at eicar.com reference >implementations. Loo

Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Florian Weimer
* Dominik George: > It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact > contain the virus sample. That's non-free code and not suitable for main, so it must be removed from the source tarball anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > Looking at it as code, it is a 16-bit DOS Hello world-program. Not > copyrightable, I suppose. I do not want EICAR to be copywritable, but I reckon it probably is. A surprising amount of work went into developing EICAR: it's a valid

Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, As dpkg introduced xz compression by default, we can make whole packages xz-ed now. I think it's worth to try, so propose it as a release goal (I know it should be sent before its dead line, but please read). ---

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread David Goodenough
On Wednesday 16 Oct 2013, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > As dpkg introduced xz compression by default, we can make whole > packages xz-ed now. I think it's worth to try, so propose it as > a release goal (I know it should be sent before its dead line, but > please read). > > > --

Bug#726534: ITP: shiro -- Apache Shiro - Java Security Framework

2013-10-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Bourg * Package name: shiro Version : 1.2.2 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://shiro.apache.org * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Apache Shiro - Java

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Marius Gavrilescu
David Goodenough writes: > The only problem is that on small machines (things like the BeagleBone) > xz compression requires enough memory that you have to enable swap to > use dpkg. Now on a machine with a sensible disk this is not a problem, > but on a machine where the "disk" is an SD-card it

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread David Goodenough
On Wednesday 16 Oct 2013, Marius Gavrilescu wrote: > David Goodenough writes: > > The only problem is that on small machines (things like the BeagleBone) > > xz compression requires enough memory that you have to enable swap to > > use dpkg. Now on a machine with a sensible disk this is not a pro

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:32:37PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: > xy may only use a tiny bit, but the combination of apt-get, dpkg and > xy seems to cause problems. Its not just BeagleBones, there are x86 > machines with just 64MB still on sale. Do we expect to build Debian packages on such sys

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread David Goodenough
On Wednesday 16 Oct 2013, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:32:37PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: > > xy may only use a tiny bit, but the combination of apt-get, dpkg and > > xy seems to cause problems. Its not just BeagleBones, there are x86 > > machines with just 64MB still on

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Marius Gavrilescu
Lars Wirzenius writes: > Do we expect to build Debian packages on such systems? David's point was that installing such a package would require too much memory due to xz's decompression memory requirements (9MB with default options). -- Marius Gavrilescu pgpuiMWwJJsFS.pgp Description: PGP sign

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:19:19PM +0300, Marius Gavrilescu wrote: > At the default preset (-6), the required RAM for decompressing is about > 9MB. The BeagleBone seems to have 256MB of memory (that's what > Wikipedia says), so 9MB shouldn't be an issue. Didn't we discuss this last year already?

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > The only problem is that on small machines (things like the BeagleBone) > xz compression requires enough memory that you have to enable swap to > use dpkg. Now on a machine with a sensible disk this is not a problem, > but on a machine where the "disk" is an SD-card it is a disaster. corre

Re: Propose Release Goals (delayed ;) - xz compression

2013-10-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/17/2013 12:35 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 05:32:37PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: >> xy may only use a tiny bit, but the combination of apt-get, dpkg and >> xy seems to cause problems. Its not just BeagleBones, there are x86 >> machines with just 64MB still on sale.

Re: s390 removed from jessie

2013-10-16 Thread Mark Hymers
On Mon, 14, Oct, 2013 at 09:28:58PM +0200, Julien Cristau spoke thus.. > Hi, > > as of tonight, s390 has been removed from the jessie suite on > ftp-master. The s390x architecture has replaced it starting with the > wheezy release. s390 remains in sid for the moment, but is likely to go > away "

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:59:33 +0200, Dominik George wrote: >Marc Haber schrieb: >>On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:19:38 +0200, "Thijs Kinkhorst" >> wrote: >>>I'm missing why the package cannot use the EICAR test virus signature >>for >>>its purposes. >> >>eicar.com does not have a distributable license. >

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:12:47AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:54:36 +0200, Dominik George > wrote: > >> Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner > >> while > >> downloading. > > > >Using a gateway anti-virus scanner for downloads from the Debi

Re: Bug#726393: general: Possible malware infections in source packages

2013-10-16 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:17:53 +, "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:12:47AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:54:36 +0200, Dominik George >> wrote: >> >> Some of the source packages were caught on a gateway anti-virus scanner >> >> while >> >> downloading.

Re: s390 removed from jessie

2013-10-16 Thread Steve McIntyre
In article <20131016184443.ga22...@hymers.org.uk> you write: >On Mon, 14, Oct, 2013 at 09:28:58PM +0200, Julien Cristau spoke thus.. >> Hi, >> >> as of tonight, s390 has been removed from the jessie suite on >> ftp-master. The s390x architecture has replaced it starting with the >> wheezy release