Bug#890227: ITP: dump1090 -- Mode S decoder specifically designed for RTLSDR devices

2018-02-12 Thread Jonathan Carter
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathan Carter * Package name: dump1090 Version : unreleased (git) Upstream Author : Salvatore Sanfilippo * URL : https://github.com/antirez/dump1090 * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description : Mode S deco

Re: Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped

2018-02-12 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:31 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > This is one of the many situations where I'd like developers to *ask* > when unsure or uncertain of somethi

Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Colin Watson
The developer's reference says [1]: A repackaged .orig.tar.{gz,bz2,xz} [...] *should not* contain any file that does not come from the upstream author(s), or whose contents has been changed by you. My recent attempt to upload grub2 2.02-3 was rejected due to https://bugs.debian.org/745409,

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 10:28:33 +, Colin Watson wrote: > I also cannot simply > remove the relevant file in this case (a CRC implementation), as doing > that would break too many existing parts of GRUB. > > Fortunately, libgcrypt upstream implemented unencumbered replacement CRC > code a while

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:42:16AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 10:28:33 +, Colin Watson wrote: > > I also cannot simply remove the relevant file in this case (a CRC > > implementation), as doing that would break too many existing parts > > of GRUB. > > > > Fortunately

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Wookey
On 2018-02-12 11:22 +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:42:16AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 10:28:33 +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Fortunately, libgcrypt upstream implemented unencumbered replacement > > > CRC code a while back, and over the week

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:09:50PM +, Wookey wrote: > On 2018-02-12 11:22 +, Colin Watson wrote: > > Huh. I hadn't thought of that option, but it seems peculiar and > > excessively baroque (it basically splits the patch into a remove and an > > add, making it less obviously identical to th

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 12 February 2018 at 10:28, Colin Watson wrote: > The developer's reference says [1]: > > A repackaged .orig.tar.{gz,bz2,xz} [...] *should not* contain any file > that does not come from the upstream author(s), or whose contents has > been changed by you. > > My recent attempt to upload gr

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Colin Watson (2018-02-12 13:18:04) > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:09:50PM +, Wookey wrote: > > On 2018-02-12 11:22 +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Huh. I hadn't thought of that option, but it seems peculiar and > > > excessively baroque (it basically splits the patch into a remove and a

Re: FTBFS with parallel make

2018-02-12 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:21:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Please keep in mind that compat 9 and earlier could use --parallel (and > compat 10+ can still use --no-parallel or --max-parallel), so these > numbers are at best rough guesstimates for the number of packages with > parallel enabled/disabl

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Wookey
On 2018-02-12 14:11 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Colin Watson (2018-02-12 13:18:04) > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:09:50PM +, Wookey wrote: > > > I'd have done the same as Simon. The main advantage is that it makes > > > the tarball free software, which we generally don't get any l

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Ole Streicher
Wookey writes: > On 2018-02-12 14:11 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> The tarball should contain only upstream code. Not patched code (then >> you arguably are making a fork). > > But we are encouraged to fork vigorously and often these days > (github...I'm looking at you). So Colin can very ea

Bug#890258: ITP: quark -- An extremely small and simple HTTP GET-only web server

2018-02-12 Thread Paride Legovini
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paride Legovini * Package name: quark Version : soon to be tagged Upstream Author : Laslo Hunhold * URL : https://tools.suckless.org/quark/ * License : ISC Programming Lang: C Description : An extremely small and

Bug#890259: ITP: fonts-monofur -- terminal font with rounded shapes

2018-02-12 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Borowski * Package name: fonts-monofur Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : tobias b köhler * URL : http://eurofurence.net/monofur.html * License : SIL OFL 1.1 Description : terminal font with rounded shapes Monofu

ubuntudiff.debian.net status

2018-02-12 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Hi all, since a few days, ubuntudiff is not reachable (name does not resolve). I see Mehdi administrate this domain ( https://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains ). Mehdi, anyone, do you know what's going on ? I saw Mehdi got his laptop stolen, maybe that's related. Thanks, F. pgppAJwh7ROGJ.pgp Des

Re: Repackaging upstream source with file modifications?

2018-02-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 12 February 2018 at 10:28, Colin Watson wrote: [...] >> My recent attempt to upload grub2 2.02-3 was rejected due to >> https://bugs.debian.org/745409, which I admit I've been putting off >> dealing with for a while; but the relevant tag >> (license-problem-non-fre

Bug#890273: ITP: python-os-service-types -- lib for consuming OpenStack sevice-types-authority data

2018-02-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-os-service-types Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/openstack/os-service-types * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Desc

Re: ubuntudiff.debian.net status

2018-02-12 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Hi, On 2018-02-12 16:58, Frédéric Bonnard wrote: Hi all, since a few days, ubuntudiff is not reachable (name does not resolve). I see Mehdi administrate this domain ( https://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains ). Mehdi, anyone, do you know what's going on ? Thanks for pointing this out. I think

Bug#890300: ITP: fonts-eurofurence -- family of geometric rounded sans serif fonts

2018-02-12 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Borowski * Package name: fonts-eurofurence Version : 4.0 Upstream Author : Tobias Köhler * URL : http://eurofurence.net/eurofurence.html * License : SIL OFL 1.1 Description : family of geometric rounded sans se

Re: Q: How to get build depends package from debian/control

2018-02-12 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Am 12.02.2018 um 05:41 schrieb Yao Wei: > [...] I'd prefer mk-build-deps from devscripts since this > produces pseudo-package that depends on the build dependencies, and the > dependencies can be removed by removing the pseudo-package. Whoa, what a gem, I did not know existed! Just what I was loo