On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:42 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official
debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query
packages.debian.org for the editex source
On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...]
On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes
buildd logs,
Then that description is wrong. It never did include buildd
On Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:59 PM, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've dug out some information from IRC logs:
saens was overloaded around 5 Jan 2006, with load average of 140 or
something, and eventually apache stopped. Since saens is one of
ftp.debian.org, it had a
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Further to
On Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:53 AM, Wolfgang Lonien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I did an 'apt-cache stats' today, and it was very nice to see that we
have 17519 packages total.
3635 packages are missing, however. An 'apt-cache unmet | grep -c
unmet dep: brings out 662 packages with unmet
Duncan Findlay wrote, Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:03 PM
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:51:46PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
And, BTW, since version 2.64 we have:
- Rules backported from 3.0.0
So though SA3 can make other things better (bayesian and so), SA2 is
not so
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 19:00, George Danchev wrote:
Normally I wouldn't mention it but if you're going to pull people up on
their grammar please at least get it right. :-)
p.s. s/an MTA/a MTA
Nope. An MTA, an SOS, a UPS. It's dependent on vowel /sounds/ rather
than vowels.
Adam
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:06 PM, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The unstable link at http://packages.debian.org/freeguide shows
version 0.8, but http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/freeguide
shows version 0.7.2. Why is this?
gluck ({people,packages}.d.o}) became severely
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:42 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding James Troup...
[...]
I still believe that it would be better for the project when he would
retire from
some of his many positions, because he's too loaded with them.
I'm assuming you haven't spotted
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:05 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
When Joerg Jaspert is already doing the dirty daily work, why does
James still needs in place then? (Except he just stays in that
position for a transitional period until Joerg is taking over that
task
On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:59 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
[...]
AFAIK, vilolating policy always waarent a serious bug:
[...]
This is not what Steve
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 18:28 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[breaking circular dependencies]
Dpkg does it the way policy says it should do it and even slightly
better since it checks for postinst files.
That's unsurprising, given that the relevant sections of policy and dpkg
were written by
Hi,
I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a single web page is a bit much, isn't
it?
Possibly. It's also 25%
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 14:50 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
I'm not quite sure how to report this. A user noted that
whatever mirror he used to create his own mirror (using debmirror)
he got a problem with dresden-ocl-1.0.1_orig.tar.gz. If he uses
- --nosources then
On Friday, August 05, 2005 3:42 PM, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 8/2/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:45:12PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
It is maintained. Patches are welcome.
On Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:08 AM, Aaron Fisher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having the same problem with a sources.list file that reads as
follows
[...]
deb http://security.debian.org stable updates
[...]
Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates Packages
404 Not Found
That's
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:56 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
Alfie Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:32:41 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
|
| ...but try come up with a rule of thumb for '%%' (big suffix), '#'
| (small prefix), etc.? Maybe the 'p' in percent is for Prefix -- but
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:17 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're interested in making this happen I'll be happy to give
you any info I can;
OK, here are some questions.
1) The copy of britney in merkel:/org/ftp.debian.org/ does not seem
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 17:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Because I don't wanna play by the rules! is not a rationale. So you have
to specify a path -- so what? The way things stand at the moment, if I were
to drop a gettext.sh in my
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:52 AM
My qa page http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
looks like this:
General information for Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (click to
collapse)
GPG key id not found! (key id was not found neither in the
Debian keyring nor on a public
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote, on Friday, June
17, 2005 6:37 AM:
Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package. I am
taking over as maintainer and uploaded a new version that also
closed a couple of bugs and moved it from non-US to main. If linking
with libssl is
Bastian Venthur wrote:
is anyone using interactive bugscripts? I mean scripts in
/usr/share/bug/ which interactively demand answers from the user.
I made a quick search on my system and I only found the texlive
packages using getkey to force a user to read a text before the
script is executed.
Cyril Brulebois wrote, Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:51:46 +0200:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (25/06/2009):
On 25/06/09 at 10:32 +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
Checkbashisms is a lintian check, right?
No, it's in devscripts.
Yes, it is also a lintian check. Although not as complete,
see
Magnus Holmgren wrote, Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:04 PM
Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The second
one gets rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies and is
removed from unstable, testing, and (after release) stable, but still
remains
in oldstable.
Question:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/01/07 04:59, Kari Pahula wrote:
I'd like to file a wishlist bug on people who file FTBFS bugs.
It would be nice if you checked first whether there's a package
pending in NEW or incoming and see if that might resolve the issue
already.
I'm looking at you, #426867.
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 21:33 +0200, Izak Burger wrote:
[...]
But no-one said english was logic :-) What with unkempt (no such word
as kempt though)
I didn't think there was, but
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/kempt?view=uk disagrees ;)
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:08 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:25:13PM +, Evgeni Golov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:42:08 -0300 Paulo Marcondes wrote:
billion = 10^6 * 10^6 (IIRC, as used in Portugal - no jokes here!)
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 12:58 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
I appear to be unable to close certain bugs lately, while others work fine.
One earlier example was #205163, which I was trying to close as it was fixed
a long time ago. Then yesterday closing #379237 and #387587 worked, but in
the
Neil Williams wrote, Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:07 AM
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:13:23 +0530
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
OK. It's in the NEW queue. Could you please tell me the procedure to
prevent it from entering the archives?
Retitle the ITP to a RM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this reopens and also reports.
[...]
echo reopen $bug|
mail -s Reopening $bug closed by spam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w3m -dump
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugspam.cgi?bug=$bug;ok=ok; else echo
If you've got devscripts installed, then bts reopen $bug .
Vincent Danjean wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If you've got devscripts installed, then bts reopen $bug .
reportspam $bug will do the same.
I suppose that the 'reportspam' command does the same thing as the
link 'Send a report that this bug log contains spam' on the bts
webpage ?
Yes
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 05:56 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/10/08 at 18:36 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
firmware-nonfree (U)
mklibs (U)
openldap (U)
php5 (U)
Steve stepped down from php's
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 20:21 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
$ rmadison libloudmouth1-0
libloudmouth1-0 |1.4.0-1 | testing | alpha, amd64, arm,
armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libloudmouth1-0 |1.4.2-1 | unstable | alpha, amd64, arm,
armel, hppa,
Hi,
Brivaldo Alves da Silva Jr wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brivaldo Alves da Silva Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to add this functionality to OpenVPN to auth on OpenLDAP.
There's already a package of openvpn-auth-ldap (packaged by Debian's openvpn
maintainer) in the NEW
Hi,
Thanks, How can I close this bug?
Just e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've done that with this mail, so
the bug should now be closed (or will be in a few minutes time).
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 20:18 +0300, Teodor wrote:
Since renaming seems to be the only solution, than IMO it is more
appropriate to rename 'plink' in putty-tools than in the plink
packages since this is exactly the source/binary package name.
[...]
This has been done already in putty-tools for
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 12:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
You should report a bug against qa.debian.org / www.debian.org.
Neither of those is the correct contact/package regarding
buildd.debian.org. I guess we
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:00:17 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Latest, the warning about quilt patches without any description.
Sure it is nice to have a description, but I don't need lintian to
tell it.
This is severity: minor, certainty: certain, which
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:28:59 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
From the lintian hacker desk:
$ lintian -I --exp-output format=letterqualifier
[...]
Other *experimental* output formats are 'xml' and 'colons' (currently
b0rken).
It's fixed in HEAD (well, it now works for me).
Adam
--
To
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:51 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I mentioned to Sune on IRC last night, the quilt tag's severity was
copied from the equivalent dpatch tag (which was originally implemented
as a warning and then moved to minor/certain
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:00 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
In reality, it is an endangered mechanism, as it was deprecated in
January 2008.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here.
I'd guess Charles meant the following addition to
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:33 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I just built a new version of one of my packages, and I got some
lintian errors like this:
E: qpdf: prerm-does-not-call-installdocs usr/share/doc-base/qpdf-manual
[...]
Once I know where the problem is, I can either fix my packages or
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 07:53 +, Oleg Verych wrote:
[...]
What about having more secure Debian's sshd_config by default?
PermitRootLogin no
You'll have to convince the openssh package maintainers first - see
#105571, #298138 and #431627 for their opinions on whether that change
is more
Daniel Baumann wrote, Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:43 AM
out of curiousity.. imagine a package where:
* the Debian maintainer is also upstream maintainer
* the package has practically no users (popcon 10)
* the package has RC bugs
* the RC bugs are fixed upstream
* the RC bugs are
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 12:14 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
[User: and Usertags: in reportbug-generated mails not reaching the BTS]
Sounds like a bug in reportbug to me; it's probably stripping out
unknown pseudoheaders.
Indeed; see #418677 and #445144, both currently filed at wishlist
against
Hi,
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote, Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:03 AM
In a fresh package (edac-utils) I have closed a bug in recent upload
(proper Closes statement and a Closes in .changes). But bug remains Done
but not closed: #456644.
From edac-utils' bug index:
Debian Bug report logs: Bugs
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 22:39 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Well... as Neil pointed it seems not to be the case -- m68k arch is
still -1 but now it is resolved.
Where are you seeing it as resolved? It's still listed as outstanding
on
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The script basically uses find on those directories (under /usr/share it
only searches for '*.sh') and then uses file on those to get a new list
of those file being shell scripts which
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 16:39 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Atm, checkbashisms only complains with this:
_From_: bashisms-amd64-2.10.15/libtool_1.5.26-1_amd64.deb
possible bashism in ./usr/bin/libtool line 1218 (trap with signal
numbers):
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 16:59 -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Atm, checkbashisms only complains with this:
_From_: bashisms-amd64-2.10.15/libtool_1.5.26-1_amd64.deb
possible bashism in ./usr/bin/libtool line 1218 (trap with signal
numbers):
It's
[nutshell version for those who can't be bothered to read the full
mail :-) - what version number should a security upload of a native
package have]
Hi,
devscripts 2.10.19 (soon to be uploaded) will modify the behaviour of
debchange --nmu to version an NMU of a native package as X+nmu1 rather
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 03:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The current binNMU numbering scheme was selected explicitly to allow
security uploads to sort later by numbering as
last_version+releaseserial; e.g., 1.2-5.1+etch1.
That makes sense, although doesn't seem to match current practice. Was
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 09:06 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
[Adding bug #437392 to Cc, which deals with this issue for normal
NMUs, because I'm making a suggestion about them.]
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:52:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
devscripts 2.10.19 (soon to be uploaded) will modify
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 11:22 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 09:06 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
[...]
Good idea. Even better, IMO, would be to use a system which is in
line with non-native packages. How about this rule:
[using X.1
Ed Falk wrote, 2008-03-28 01:35:
For the nth time squared, an initscript MUST NOT FAIL to stop an
already stopped service.
How is it supposed to do that? The service isn't running, so can't be
stopped, therefore the script (if called to stop it) can only fail
to stop it...
If the service is
Michal Čihař wrote, Monday, April 07, 2008 11:16 AM
I currently have following, but it does not seem to work and
the #md5= is not removed.
opts=downloadurlmangle=s/#.*// \
http://pypi.python.org/simple/python-mpd/ \
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote, Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:24 AM
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
do you have updated devscripts? debsign signs the dsc then updates the
md5 hash in the changes before signing that. It needs to update the sha
checks as well. The latest
Raphael Hertzog wrote, Friday, April 25, 2008 3:16 PM
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, James Vega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
This DEP is available on the Debian Wiki[1].
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX, where X
is a
counter starting
Russ Allbery wrote:
Bryan Donlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently I have a situation where attempting to upgrade imagemagick
from version 7:6.2.4.5.dfsg1-1+lenny1 to version 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2+b1
pulls in over 200mb of dependencies, including mozilla-browser,
iceape-browser, and half of
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 09:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recommend to always do an upgrade before doing a dist-upgrade (or
install of something pulling in 200mb). The upgrade will never install
new or remove packages so it is save. It usualy
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 21:45 +0200, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
It looks like the morse package isn't built by the build daemons, even
though it is Architecture: any in the control file. I think this
might be caused by the morse package in oldstable, which was a totally
different package with the
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 19:50 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
Recent openssl issue lead me to http://db.debian.org/password.html and
made me wonder why script example uses DSA key while main text only
talks about RSA key.
The text talks about RSA keys as they are
martin f krafft wrote, Tuesday, May 20, 2008 1:41 PM
also sprach Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.05.20.1323 +0100]:
Le mardi 20 mai 2008 à 12:05 +0100, martin f krafft a écrit :
if [ $1 = configure -a -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]
Note -that the $1 = configure check is wrong, see
Michael Meskes wrote, 2008-06-23, 10:07:27 +0200:
With our move to dash as sh we have to remove all bashisms from
scripts run by /bin/sh. However, checkbashism seems to moan
about clauses that work in dash as well.
I don't know in which shells a trap with a signal number is
guaranteed to work,
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 19:28 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It's not guaranteed to work in any shell implementing POSIX without
extensions, which is what Policy says you're allowed to rely on (well,
plus a few extensions
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 19:45 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 01:33:21PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
From this I'd say for Lenny using trap with a signal number is fine.
Also they same question comes up with the local keyword. Dash seems to
support this, while it is
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 17:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Supporting local x would be relatively simple; suggestions for a
reliable regex to catch use of -a/-o welcome... :)
There was a fairly good one in Lintian that I took out once Policy blessed
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:34 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Supporting local x would be relatively simple; suggestions for a
reliable regex to catch use of -a/-o welcome... :)
There was a fairly good one in Lintian
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:36 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:00:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming not-POSIX-but-supported-by-policy checkbashisms already has a
flag to indicate whether echo -n should be flagged for exactly this
reason; otherwise it errs
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
The next release of checkbashisms will include a --posix flag which
will allow the non-POSIX behaviours permitted by policy to be flagged.
Currently neither set of local checks flags local x, y; I seem to
remember there being a discussion relating to that syntax
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
To clarify: is local foo=bar policy-compliant or not?
(If not, *sigh*.)
To the best of my knowledge, no, it's not compliant. The relevant section
reads:
snip
* `local' to create a scoped variable must be supported; however,
`local' may or may not
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
The package was removed after noone was interested in maintaining it
for four(!) years.
Huh?
[...]
* Orphan package (see #228074).
-- Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:38:42 +0100
That's about 6 month
Hi,
On Mon, August 25, 2008 11:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
downgrading severity, as this is about an old issue with tetex and because
there is probably even a lintian check for this already. (Too lazy to
confirm
now, thus I'm also not reassigning the bug to lintian yet.)
As far as I can see,
# CC to debian-devel for squeeze blocker
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 605912 + squeeze-is-blocker
thanks
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this bug. I think the patch you've suggested is
the wrong solution, however.
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 01:14 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
I
On Mon, January 10, 2011 09:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
According to #370348, since 5.3 base-files has supported /etc/profile
sourcing /etc/profile.d. I am using version 6.0.
However /etc/profiles seems to be doing no such thing.
When was the system in question installed?
The changelog for
Hi,
I was just having a look at the diff for your upload of
pdf-presenter-console 1.1.1+git.02dfcf-3, fixing #609608, to check if it
was suitable for unblocking for squeeze.
Firstly, thanks for fixing the bug so quickly. Unfortunately, the upload
included a couple of other changes which aren't
Gah, that was intended for debian-release, not debian-devel; please direct
follow-ups to -release.
On Tue, January 11, 2011 13:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
I was just having a look at the diff for your upload of
pdf-presenter-console 1.1.1+git.02dfcf-3, fixing #609608, to check
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:43 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
My plans are to upload before the end of the upcoming week-end an NMU
for each of the affected package(s).
I currently have:
fwiw, from a quick look at the list, at least boxbackup would need a
t-p-u upload in order to get fixed
On Thu, January 20, 2011 03:18, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Brian May
br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
What is policy when security updates for stable introduce new
regressions in software that weren't there before? Can these get fixed
in stable?
If a stable
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:58 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
until today our Release files included 3 Hashes for all their entries:
MD5SUM, SHA1, SHA256. I just modified the code to no longer include
MD5SUM in *all* newly generated Release files.
When will that affect Release files for stable?
severity 615476 important
tag 615476 + unreproducible
thanks
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:25 +0300, sergey wrote:
Some programs can not start because of missing libtiff.so.3 file.
I suspect this is a local problem, as none of the packages in question
depends on libtiff at all; I'm therefore
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 13:08 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:25 +0300, sergey wrote:
Some programs can not start because of missing libtiff.so.3 file.
I suspect this is a local problem, as none of the packages in question
depends on libtiff at all; I'm therefore
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 14:33 +0300, sergey wrote:
Is it possible that this problem exists because I have some old
programs in /usr/local that I moved from my previous Slackware system?
Yes, I suspect that's the problem; specifically:
/usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0:
The version of
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 16:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Fri Mar 11, 2011 at 13:11:52 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Chile was supposed to leave the Summer daylight savings period this
coming weekend, but it was pushed to April
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 13:54 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas dijo [Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:31:36PM +0100]:
Chile was supposed to leave the Summer daylight savings period this
coming weekend, but it was pushed to April 2nd. The fixes have been
accepted to the package in Sid,
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to
squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing
the tzdata update in tomorrow morning.
Unfortunately, that didn't happen yet. Adding packages
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to
squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing
the tzdata update in tomorrow morning
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 11:01 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
we have disabled the contents generator of apt-ftparchive and replaced
it by a new implementation in dak. There are some visible changes:
[...]
The new implementation is currently only used for suites that are not
marked as untouchable.
On Tue, March 15, 2011 21:40, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
The new implementation is currently only used for suites that are not
marked as untouchable. Oldstable and stable will switch during the next
point release.
Have you (or anyone else) verified that any tools in {old,}stable
parsing contents
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 20:45 +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Using the following in sources.list:
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main contrib
non-free
deb-src ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main
contrib non-free
The above is not
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:10 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 22:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 20:45 +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Using the following in sources.list:
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable
On Thu, March 31, 2011 09:18, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Its simpler: The Release files tell us which Codename and Suite this
archive is for - if thats different from the one you mentioned in
sources.list you will get this lovely warning
And yes, Christoph is right, something is wrong with
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 21:24 +0200, Johan Walles wrote:
Look here:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses/2011040311.html.gz
Look at the following line:
lia id=asymptote/amd64 name=asymptote/amd64asymptote/amd64/a
(2.02-2 to 2.02-2)
Why is asymptote being upgraded both
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:12 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, April 04, 2011 12:05:09 PM Neil McGovern wrote:
I also note a lack of replies to feedb...@release.debian.org - these
mails are definately useful, but I really would appreciate any comments
going there, so I don't have to
On Wed, April 20, 2011 09:57, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
wrote:
.. as validated by the desktop-file-validate utility, as used by
lintian.
desktop-file-validate is not used by lintian, perhaps there should be
a test similar to the
On Thu, April 28, 2011 19:03, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 28/04/11 at 12:05 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
And at the same time, having a non-frozen rolling release available
during freeze time could easily distract people from working on
testing/frozen at all, because a shiny rolling release that they
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:38 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:14:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- Doing an NMU without trying to contact the maintainer beforehand could be
considered an aggressive behaviour, or a way to punish the maintainer
for
not
Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:57:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
- statically-linked-binary
This is not always a bug. e.g. dar-static is supposed to be statically
linked!
Lintian intentionally doesn't warn about binaries with names ending -static,
hence the
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
* gupnp
- libnice not yet rebuilt/reuploaded
libnice was binNMUed as part of this transition so shouldn't be a
blocker. The remaining issue that I can currently see here is gupnp-igd
being out-of-date on mips.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 15:45 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
[...]
- empathy not built on kfreebsd*
It’s waiting on geoclue, which in turn needs disabling of gammu support
on !linux.
There does not
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo