per-bug mailing lists appear to be working again

2024-06-19 Thread Don Armstrong
that it completes correctly, and have sent a few test messages. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com Vimes hated and despised the privileges of rank, but they had this to be said for them: At least they meant that you could hate and despise them in comfort. --

Re: An important lesson

2004-10-28 Thread Don Armstrong
omised gpg: revocation comment: Compromised on the uid/gid remapping on alioth perhaps. Don Armstrong -- Quite the contrary; they *love* collateral damage. If they can make you miserable enough, maybe you'll stop using email entirely. Once enough people do that, then there'll be no l

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

2004-12-06 Thread Don Armstrong
be mistaken. > > > > It is much, much worse. There is a picture of naked animal there. > > Ok, I'll bite: which file? Hell, it's even worse. We distribute a picture with a naked animal admonishing impressionable youngsters to imbibe! Upstream doesn't even stoop

Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-09 Thread Don Armstrong
e prefered source form clause. Even putting some > in non-free works fine. They'd pretty much have to go into non-free, as I'd imagine most of them wouldn't be able to satisfy DFSG 2 if they were unable to satisfy the GPL's source code requirement. Don Armstrong -- When I w

Re: Are BLOBs source code?

2004-12-12 Thread Don Armstrong
exists, as this is the conservative path. Let those with high powered council and a willingness to enter into battle with the copyright holders do otherwise if they wish. Don Armstrong -- Three little words. (In decending order of importance.) I love you -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvo

Re: murphy is listed on spamcop

2005-01-02 Thread Don Armstrong
27;s visit to Kuwait this month. When a National Guardsman asked why the Army had not provided sufficient armor for his unit's vehicles, Rumsfeld said "You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have." Don Armstrong 1: http://www

Re: Bug#288497: ITP: libsnowball-swedish-perl -- Stemming algorithm for Swedish

2005-01-04 Thread Don Armstrong
ion teeny perl modules. [You probably should also let upstream know that they should consider bundling these together on CPAN, or even distributing them as a single module.] Don Armstrong -- If you wish to strive for peace of soul, then believe; if you wish to be a devotee of truth,

Re: apt-get should be able to install packages "directly"

2005-01-06 Thread Don Armstrong
hlist bug #47379 (yes, an oldie but a goodie) against apt. Don Armstrong -- Personally, I think my choice in the mostest-superlative-computer wars has to be the HP-48 series of calculators. They'll run almost anything. And if they can't, while I'll just plug a Linux box into the

Why does Debian distributed firmware not need to be Depends: upon? [was Re: LCC and blobs]

2005-01-09 Thread Don Armstrong
the foo package would help me at least understand this line of reasoning.[1] [Yes, I really have read almost all of the messages in this thread, and I'm still having a hard time figuring out this line of reasoning.] Don Armstrong 1: It would also be useful if the specific cases where Depend

Re: scripts to download porn in Debian?

2005-02-02 Thread Don Armstrong
wish to be associated with religion, to implicitly approve of it, by including programs designed to download and view it, or including actual religious content? Ah, ad hominem and unfounded assumptions, how I love thee! Don Armstrong -- It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means tha

Re: scripts to download porn in Debian?

2005-02-03 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Brian May wrote: > >>>>> "Don" == Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Don> 2. Should Debian publish content I disagree with which is > Don> DFSG free? > > I really think we need to draw the line som

Re: Bug#293669: ITP: xen -- virtual machine monitor

2005-02-04 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005, Thomas Wana wrote: > * Package name: xen xen is already in unstable. xen: (a Virtual Machine Monitor like User-Mode-Linux), section misc, is extra. Version: 1.2-4.1 (sid), Packaged size: 657 kB, Installed size: 716 kB Don Armstrong -- Frankly,

Bug#242281: (no subject)

2005-02-16 Thread Don Armstrong
clone 242281 -1 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 Please remove mush from the archive as we do not have permision to distribute it thanks On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Pawel Wiecek wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2:03am, Don Armstrong wrote: > > >

Re: MTA in base system installation

2005-02-17 Thread Don Armstrong
postfix sendmail-bin smail ssmtp xmail zmailer Don Armstrong -- I'd never hurt another living thing. But if I did... It would be you. -- Chris Bishop http://www.chrisbishop.com/her/archives/her69.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: MTA in base system installation

2005-02-17 Thread Don Armstrong
7;s not the point. > I'm just wondering if it makes sense to have a full MTA installed by > default. It does if you want mail to be deliverable locally on a machine without a network connection at all. It's really a personal decision, and exim is probably a reasonable default. Don

Re: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])

2005-02-21 Thread Don Armstrong
ry popular but are being actively maintained by a maintainer who supposedly uses the package in question.[1] Don Armstrong 1: Hell, I use and maintain a few packages that aren't too terribly popular. -- I don't care how poor and inefficient a little country is; they like to run their o

Re: [RFC] OpenLDAP automatic upgrade

2005-03-17 Thread Don Armstrong
ll we're doing is windmill tilting. Don Armstrong -- There is no mechanical problem so difficult that it cannot be solved by brute strength and ignorance. -- William's Law http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Re: BTS down?

2005-11-21 Thread Don Armstrong
ge, I may be able to track it down if it ever actually reached spohr. Don Armstrong -- When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked Him to forgive me. -- Emo Philips. http://www.donarmstrong.com

Re: BTS down?

2005-11-22 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Bastian Venthur wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Gregor Jasny wrote: > >> Bastian Venthur schrieb: > >> > Can somebody confirm that there is a problem with the BTS? > >> > >> I've got the same setup

Re: finding the number of people subscribed to a bug

2005-11-23 Thread Don Armstrong
n the fact that the number of subscribers won't necessarily indicate the number of people who are interested in a bug or its importance.] Don Armstrong -- Frankly, if ignoring inane opinions and noisy people and not flaming them to crisp is bad behaviour, I have not yet achieved a state of nirv

Re: BTS down?

2005-11-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Gregor Jasny wrote: > Don Armstrong schrieb: > > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Gregor Jasny wrote: > > > >>Bastian Venthur schrieb: > >> > >>>Can somebody confirm that there is a problem with the BTS? > >> > >>I&#x

Bug#344903: ITP: libpoe-component-client-ident-perl -- A POE Component that provides non-blocking ident lookups

2005-12-27 Thread Don Armstrong
tistic Description : A POE component that provides non-blocking ident lookups POE::Component::Client::Ident is a POE component that provides non-blocking Ident lookup services to other POE components and sessions. [This module is needed for the new version of libpoe-component-irc-perl] Don Arm

Re: How to Increase Contributions from Volunteers

2006-01-02 Thread Don Armstrong
posibilities therein. If you send in 10 pulltabs, you can accheive the rank of "Proven Debian Contributor". Operators are standing by. Don Armstrong -- THERE IS NO GRAVITY THE WORLD SUCKS -- Vietnam War Penquin Lighter http://gallery.donarmstrong.com/clippings/vietnam_there_is_no_gravit

Re: not getting CCs from the bugs I reported

2006-01-03 Thread Don Armstrong
. Of > course it should be easy to unsubscribe. See #37078 et al. Don Armstrong -- In all matters of government, the correct answer is usually: "Do nothing" -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p428 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Packet radio and foul language

2006-01-09 Thread Don Armstrong
it, then killfile them if they persist. I, for one, am far more interested in the message than the way which the message is conveyed. Don Armstrong -- Miracles had become relative common-places since the advent of entheogens; it now took very unusual circumstances to attract public attention to

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

2006-01-19 Thread Don Armstrong
exception or modification or suspension > of the DFSG. The issue here devolves into a question of interpretation; if we can decide to interpret the Foundation Documents in any way we want simply by a majority vote, the requirement to have changes to them meet a 3:1 majority becomes rather p

Re: klik, loop mounts, and insecurity [was: statement from one of the klik project members]

2006-01-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Sam Morris wrote: > AFAIK Linux only supports eight loopback mounts at a time. This > won't be a problem once FUSE becomes more widespread. The default is 8; by seting the max_loop kernel option, you can increase this to 256. Don Armstrong -- "You have ma

Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages

2006-02-03 Thread Don Armstrong
at the other clauses in the PHP license which are problematic shouldn't be dealt with as well...] Don Armstrong -- The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns

Re: Change in Katie's messages

2006-02-09 Thread Don Armstrong
ne ack. I've gone ahead and fixed this, and it shouldn't pose any further problems. If anyone else has issues with the BTS, please file bugs against the bugs.debian.org pseudopackage (or the debbugs package) as appropriate. Don Armstrong 1: It said X-Debian-PR-Packag instead. Since

Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-21 Thread Don Armstrong
;Send a report that this bug log contains spam." Blars Blarson will then (when he has time) review your report, and clean up the spam and/or modify the filters if necessary. Don Armstrong -- Any excuse will serve a tyrant. -- Aesop http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzl

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-23 Thread Don Armstrong
, and > therefore the command may fail even if the directory is empty. > > rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /usr/local/lib/foo || true So you're suggesting that it's better to fail silently instead of failing loudly? Don Armstrong -- "There are two major products that c

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Correct, so one would put in foo.postrm: > >> > > >

Re: Processed: block 322762 with 355341

2006-03-06 Thread Don Armstrong
icates that a bug cannot be closed/fixed/addressed until the bugs that it is blocked by are closed. See #342938 et al. for more information about the documentation bug. Don Armstrong -- I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infan

Re: Processed: block 322762 with 355341

2006-03-09 Thread Don Armstrong
It'll still close it. [scripts/process.in, which is the part that deals with messages to -done currently doesn't know anything about blocking.] Don Armstrong -- I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infant OS in need of th

Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental?

2005-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Marc Haber wrote: > Is this documented somewhere? Pinning is such a powerful tool, and > nobody seems to really understand it. See apt_preferences(5) [specifically the "APT's Default Priority Assignments" section.] Don Armstrong -- Cheop's Law:

Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot.

2005-03-24 Thread Don Armstrong
d fewer packages that don't follow the recommendation of Policy 9.3.3.2.[1] If you find such a package, please file a wishlist bug against it requesting that the follow the recommendation of Policy not to call the init scripts directly. Don Armstrong 1: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-p

Re: Idea: about package installation under chroot.

2005-03-24 Thread Don Armstrong
The three examples that I picked at random all use invoke-rc.d. [Two of which because they use debhelper to do the invoking.] Don Armstrong -- "A one-question geek test. If you get the joke, you're a geek: Seen on a California license plate on a VW Beetle: 'FEATURE'...&q

Re: Right of a maintainer not to respect FHS

2005-04-04 Thread Don Armstrong
similar as a last resort. Otherwise, all you're doing is abusing the BTS, no matter how correct your actual appraisal of the severity bug is. Don Armstrong 1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300765&msg=13 2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300765&msg=14

Re: Why do we still have this on the distribution?

2005-04-05 Thread Don Armstrong
f the package precludes it from being included in a release (IE, unresolved RC bugs) the package will continue being released on the assumption that the maintainer actually knows better than any one else if people are really using the package. Don Armstrong -- Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also

Re: Why do we still have this on the distribution?

2005-04-05 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Don Armstrong dijo [Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:17:26PM -0700]: > > Until Adam Conrad decides that it shouldn't be in the archive, or > > the bugginess of the package precludes it from being included in a > > release (IE, unresolved

Re: Why do we still have this on the distribution?

2005-04-06 Thread Don Armstrong
t some future date when sarge releases[2] just isn't going to do anything for me. Don Armstrong 1: I'd argue that anyone who doesn't actually want to support (or at least help support) their package with security fixes, etc. in stable probably should already have such a bug fi

Re: Right of a maintainer not to respect FHS

2005-04-08 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Don Armstrong dies 04/04/2005 hora 01:09: > > Otherwise, all you're doing is abusing the BTS, no matter how correct > > your actual appraisal of the severity bug is. > > Downgrading a bug that is a clear violation of t

Re: All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free

2005-04-14 Thread Don Armstrong
ms that programs do.] {I'm too lazy to dig up the references to this right now, esp. since people.debian.org/~terpstra is broken, but search -vote around the time that the SC modification GR was being debated, specifically for my conversations with Anthony Towns.} Don Armstrong -- It has al

Re: All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free

2005-04-14 Thread Don Armstrong
copyright statement of a work distributed in Debian should be DFSG Free. [I'd argue additionally that these random licenses have no business being distributed in Debian at all, even if they were DFSG Free, but that's a separate matter.] Don Armstrong -- Our days are precious, but we gla

Re: What do you win by moving things to non-free?

2005-04-15 Thread Don Armstrong
l seriously consider comments of Debian on > licence problems. So we should not worry at all about licensing issues? How would Qt have been relicensed then?[2][3] > What do you win by moving things to non-free? We make the separation between which works are free, and which works are not free

Re: And now for something completely different... etch!

2005-06-07 Thread Don Armstrong
s especially insane when there are already reasonable methods for having multiple versions of things installed when that is a reasonable thing to do. (Think libfoo2, autoconf2.13 or similar.) Don Armstrong -- "For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. For those w

Re: And now for something completely different... etch!

2005-06-08 Thread Don Armstrong
(echo "false" >/etc/X11/default-display-manager or similar) then telinit 3; or whatever. > Yes, most people with Debian experience could work around this but > it's way beyond most desktop users that don't know what init.d is. These people probably won't be ab

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-15 Thread Don Armstrong
ed in a manner consistent with trademark law[2] would have to be expunged from the work, which is quite a bit different than merely chaging the name of the work. Don Armstrong 1: As I'm sure you're aware, it's primarily a nod to TeX et al. and a compromise so TeX could be distributed. 2: E

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > All of MoFo trademarks that were not being used in a manner > > consistent with trademark law[2] would have to be expunged from > > the work, > > What trademarks are you refer

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > All of MoFo trademarks that were not being used in a manner > > > &

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-17 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > Well I don't think DFSG #4 says the rename has to be easy, it just > has to be possible. Yes. However, the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming, not being forced to change content. Don Armstrong -- Build a fire for a man,

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-17 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming, not being > > forced to change content. > > If I change the name of my program, I also change all references to > that name in

Re: Alioth Project Approved - and now?

2005-06-27 Thread Don Armstrong
checking, it does not support scp;[1] yet, since it's GPLed, adding that support shouldn't be too terribly difficult if someone actually wants it.] Don Armstrong 1: This was actually the only reason I still had ssh1 support when I had a collection of macintoshes running something beside

Re: sphor (aka bugs.debian.org) going down twice due to power maintenance

2005-06-29 Thread Don Armstrong
S during this time, I currently have a mirror that lags between 15-30 minutes behind bugs.debian.org which you can feel free to use: http://bugs.donarmstrong.com [It supports all the usual redirects (like b.d.o/bugnum), but since I use it for debugging patches to the bts it may not be 100% relia

Re: dak now supports ~ in version numbers

2006-08-09 Thread Don Armstrong
to be implemented. It should be updated accordingly, but that by itself is no reason not to use them. Don Armstrong -- "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." -- Jeremy S. Anderson http://www.donarmstr

Re: search.debian.org

2006-08-14 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Don Armstrong: > > Assuming there's a box available that can handle it, HyperEstraier is > > pretty easy to set up and configure to do this sort of thing... > > According to what I've heard, it tries to fit the whol

Re: Not able to build a package with pbuilder

2006-08-16 Thread Don Armstrong
onflict between pbuilder and dpkg-buildpackage? It means that your upstream is having issues; configure should be +x in the orig.tar.gz. Since it's not, you can either "sh ./configure;" or chmod +x, then ./configure in debian/rules. I'd suggest the first, because the second will give

Re: Why not only support Sid and Testing?

2006-09-11 Thread Don Armstrong
you see on the surface via the mailing lists really is a small microcosm of what is going on. Real work rarely happens in MUAs; it happens in editors and on the command line. Don Armstrong -- A people living under the perpetual menace of war and invasion is very easy to govern. It demands no soc

Re: transition plan for apt-listbugs onto Debian infrastructure: temporarily on merkel.debian.org, then move over to bugs.debian.org

2006-09-24 Thread Don Armstrong
direct to send it to the appropriate server, so this can happen seamlessly. If you also give me an idea of where the index.*.db files are being downloaded from, I can put an HTTP redirect to them as well so no code changes are required when we do switch over. Don Armstrong -- An elephant: A m

Re: transition plan for apt-listbugs onto Debian infrastructure: temporarily on merkel.debian.org, then move over to bugs.debian.org

2006-09-25 Thread Don Armstrong
r b.d.o; I don't remember if a redirect on a POST will work properly, but hopefully it will. [It will take until apache is reloaded on spohr for it to take effect, though.] Don Armstrong -- "People selling drug paraphernalia ... are as much a part of drug trafficking as silencers are a part

Re: how to tell people to dpkg-reconfigure exim4-_CONFIG_?

2006-10-10 Thread Don Armstrong
rm the user of things is really not ideal. README.Debian, NEWS.Debian, and low priority debconf notes when appropriate are much, much better. Don Armstrong -- I shall require that [a scientific system's] logical form shall be such that it can be singled out, by means of emperical tests, in a

Re: how to tell people to dpkg-reconfigure exim4-_CONFIG_?

2006-10-10 Thread Don Armstrong
idn't propose how to fix, > just a piece of information for users how to find out how to do what > they actually wanted to do. So have a note in exim4's debconf which tells the users that, and only display the note if DEBCONF_RECONFIGURE=1 or $1='reconfigure'. Don

Re: Can someone explain : " wmaker (0.92.0-6) is newer than that in Debian!"

2006-10-15 Thread Don Armstrong
rg/wmaker|grep -i -A 1 unstable * [14]unstable (x11): NeXTSTEP-like window manager for X 0.92.0-5.3: alpha amd64 arm hppa hurd-i386 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 (The BTS actually has it right) Don Armstrong -- If you find it impossible to believe that the universe didn't have a cr

Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?

2006-10-16 Thread Don Armstrong
, not the same thing. It's great! We can use this to have endless flamewars over which iceweasel we are in fact distributing. I think a combination of this, and a few more firmware and DPL recal GRs will enable me to cut back on my heating costs this winter! Don Armstrong (Your flamemaster general)

Re: Bug mass filling

2006-10-19 Thread Don Armstrong
ackage is not fit for release. Otherwise, when the RMs have clarified the release policy (as they have just done), then we should go back to fixing bugs instead of arguing about whether or not the bugs are really all that bad or not. Don Armstrong -- Il semble que la perfection soit atteinte no

Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today

2006-10-20 Thread Don Armstrong
which do have such identifiable characterestics already have them in place; messages sent to nnn-done@ and nnn@ have no such requirements, though. In general, just clicking on the report spam links are good enough; in cases like this where large amounts of spam have been crafted which beat the ext

Re: Bug mass filling

2006-10-21 Thread Don Armstrong
;in theory" be working now. Usertag: fooblehtag should set the fooblehtag of the user sending the mail. Don Armstrong -- If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money it values more, it will lose that, too

Re: Bug mass filling

2006-10-21 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061021 09:54]: > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > Please hold off on filing them for a few days, so I can add > > > > usertag-on-submit support to debbugs,

Re: Bug mass filling

2006-10-21 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Don Armstrong] > > Well, once I wake up a bit, you'll be able to go: > > > > Package: foopkg > > User: username > > Usertags: fooblehtag,bartag > > > > [But it won't work for setting multi

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 6

2006-10-24 Thread Don Armstrong
n the other package being unpacked. Since there is no way to specify this kind of dependency, Depends: is as close as you can get. Don Armstrong -- It has always been Debian's philosophy in the past to stick to what makes sense, regardless of what crack the rest of the universe is

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 6

2006-10-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> [Ian Jackson] > >> > The only argument I've heard against circular dependencies as a > >> > general rul

Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today

2006-10-31 Thread Don Armstrong
rs have to hop through decreases the likelihood of them actually reporting spam. Decreasing the score at which we ignore messages is trivial, but it means increasing the number of false positives. [And because backscatter is bad, these will be messages which just "disappear", unless some (

Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today

2006-11-01 Thread Don Armstrong
false positives. [And yes, messages sent by scripts or people who haven't learned to jump through the right hoops are clearly false positives.] Don Armstrong -- A people living under the perpetual menace of war and invasion is very easy to govern. It demands no social reforms. It does not

Re: Lots of (easily recognisible) spam sent to the BTS today

2006-11-04 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > > a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a > > >sp

Re: Bug#397646: exim4-config: reportbug mail issue

2006-11-09 Thread Don Armstrong
s that it even asks whether to use the local smtp server in the "novice" case.] Don Armstrong -- Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you. If you don't bet, you can't win. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p240 http://www.donarmstrong.co

Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-12 Thread Don Armstrong
e bts knows about it, it shows up as "in other > versions" or something. You should be hard pressed to be able to actually install packages before the BTS has learned about the version unless you're filing bugs on packages which you've built yourself. [Far more likely that

Re: BTS Question

2006-11-12 Thread Don Armstrong
ew;found=amavisd-new%2F1%3A2.3.3-2;fixed=1%3A2.3.3-2 makes it pretty clear precisely what is happening there. Don Armstrong -- Tell me something interesting about yourself. Lie if you have to. -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/archives/batch20.php http://www.donarmstrong.com

Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-13 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > When using "bts show package" or going to > > > "http://bugs.debian.org/package"; we get that be

Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour

2006-11-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:50:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > When using "bts show package" or going to > > > "http://bugs.debian.org/package"; we ge

Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751

2006-11-16 Thread Don Armstrong
ng ls: testing: Permission denied $ sudo chmod 750 testing; $ cat testing/hello cat: testing/hello: Permission denied Any questions? Don Armstrong -- America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-

Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751

2006-11-16 Thread Don Armstrong
e that none > of the files in his home directory are world-readable. This is what umask is for. Don Armstrong -- Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all other possibilities. -– W. Churchill http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

2006-11-30 Thread Don Armstrong
dered (by me, anyway), see #376594 and my responses. As a final note, using usertags to handle this sort of situtation is quite easy: user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertag 400693 notabug thanks Don Armstrong -- "I'm a rational being--of a sort--rational enough, at least, to see the symptoms o

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

2006-12-04 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > Has blocking been documented since I looked for the last time? Blocking has been documented for quite some time: revision 1.54 date: 2006-07-13 15:14:12 -0700; author: joeyh; state: Exp; lines: +7 -0 document block/unblock Don Armstrong --

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

2006-12-04 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:30:40 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > >Blocking has been documented for quite some time: > > > >revision 1.54 > >date: 2006-07-13 15:1

Re: Why not scan for unmaintained packages and orphan them?

2006-12-05 Thread Don Armstrong
or the reporter to see it, use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user. Don Armstrong -- [Panama, 1989. The U.S. government called it "Operation Just Cause".] I think they misspelled this. Shouldn't it be "Operation Just 'Cause"? -- TekPolitik http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=

Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?

2006-12-08 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:51:26 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >$ GET http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control|grep block > >block bugnumber by bug > >... > > Note that the fix for the first bug is b

blocking bugs [Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?]

2006-12-09 Thread Don Armstrong
ly, None. > and what's the behavioral difference between being blocked and not? Besides the display above, there is no difference. This all may change at some point in the future, but since that's the way it works now, the documentation is pretty complete. Don Armstrong -- &

Re: blocking bugs [Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?]

2006-12-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote: > Bug blocking only being a specialized kind of tagging is a total > surprise for me. And I suspect that I am not the only one. Since it's confusing to you, you're the best person to submit patches. Don Armstrong -- Taxes are not levied

blockers [Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?]

2006-12-11 Thread Don Armstrong
useful. [As far as removing them on close, what would probably be most useful is to indicate that the blocker has been closed in the blockee's list, and that it's no longer blocked if it all of the blockers are closed.] Don Armstrong -- Grimble left his mother in the food store and w

Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-12 Thread Don Armstrong
t by reopening bugs when they appear to have been closed in error, or tagging bugs to assist maintainers in classifying their bugs of course. Just don't use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong.] Don Armstrong 1: There's also the "Don Armstrong reported it, so you damn well beter f

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-15 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:05:35AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > If you're doing this, you better have already written (or gotten > > someone else to write) the patch to fix whatever bug you want > > reopened and fixed; othe

Re: Do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for bug ping-pong

2006-12-15 Thread Don Armstrong
capriciously either,[1] but it is the maintainer's right to do so. [I don't think there's much that can be done if a maintainer wants to be an ass short of hijacking their packages... thankfully, that's a course of action which I don't have to contemplate.] Don Armstr

Re: Proposal for Lenny: Please avoid duplicated changelogs for binary packages sharing the same source package

2007-01-02 Thread Don Armstrong
irectories to /dev/null in dpkg, but I personally don't have time to code that nor a desire to disappear.] Don Armstrong -- S: Make me a sandwich B: What? Make it yourself. S: sudo make me a sandwich B: Okay. -- xkcd http://xkcd.com/c149.html http://www.donarmstrong.com htt

Re: Bug#322762: no blocking bugs anymore

2007-01-05 Thread Don Armstrong
purpose? Granted, if the upgrade was split and basefile's postinst ran before the other packages, the final cleanup would take another upgrade to go into effect... but it would avoid mucking with files that don't belong to basefiles. Don Armstrong -- There are two types of people in thi

Re: localisation in system wide daemons

2007-01-11 Thread Don Armstrong
ized (whatever language that means changing them into) then the system wide locale should not be set to that language. It's trivial to change the language to C if that's a problem. Don Armstrong -- "A one-question geek test. If you get the joke, you're a geek: Seen on a Ca

Re: DPL Debate prepared questions list [Debian Policy Sucks]

2006-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
do it? Want to release faster? There are RC bugs that need patches, and transitions that need planning. Want to make sure that the next release supports your hardware? Help test your hardware with the newest d-i nightlies and assist the d-i team. Don Armstrong 1: I suppose it may be conside

Re: Use clisp shiped with source or from Debian?

2006-04-12 Thread Don Armstrong
nly need common-lisp-controller, not clisp itself, unless the code in question will only work with clisp, not any of the other common lisp implementations. [Someone else who is more familiar with lisp will have to answer this aspect, though.] Don Armstrong -- A citizen of America will cross the ocean t

Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package

2006-04-14 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Torsten Marek wrote: > >> - eog > > > > As said, Gnome bloat. Use gqview or pornview. > > Well, don't take pornview or you'll soon have a bug report about > politically incorrect package names;-) Try feh. Much, much more powerfu

Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package

2006-04-17 Thread Don Armstrong
ore than 50 command line options, that may be the case... but it definetly gets rid of the bloat present in other image viewers. [This is probably YA case of the desktop task recommending software that few of us actually use.] Don Armstrong -- "A one-question geek test. If you get the joke,

Re: Archiving bugs with version info (Was: Re: Closing a bug vs. tagging wontfix)

2006-04-24 Thread Don Armstrong
ld be usefull to keep it > until the buggy version is available in the archive, what do others > think? Archiving is currently disabled until the exact mechanism of its operation with versioning is worked out; presumably it will only archive bugs which no longer affect any version in the ar

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >