-critical, some work required, having a team for these
packages would be ideal)
I would like to be part of the team for these packages.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
, it is a whole different project. I don't think
there is a GPL compatible reimplementation of libcrypto, but maybe I'm
wrong.
Why do you require the same symbols? Have you already written the code
for libcrypto? If not what does it matter what symbols are provided?
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL
? Is there a bug against gnutls?
You might like to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
discuss these problems further, and for any help that I can provide you
with.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
project and then coordinate your work with them.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help the decision.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you out as well.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for building without automake as I'm sure some of them don't need
it.
Good luck,
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to help out and then create patches for all the necessary
packages?
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the work so far at
http://jameswestby.net/debian/ssl-cert2-0.1.tar.gz
though it is far from ready, and probably doesn't even work yet. Note
the packaging is currently native, and the insertion of the lib in to
the script will be removed, I just haven't done it yet.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
* Make it easier for package maintainers
- One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that
it doesn't
On (28/07/06 13:16), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
I don't like it when people make using helper packages de facto
required. And debhelper isn't standard (meaning that you can expect
everyone to use it), merely very common. It is also very good
On (28/07/06 12:12), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
But, yes, like all of debhelper it's just a convenience wrapper
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 12:32 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
My personal experience is not consistent with this.
I have several very small ocaml packages waiting in NEW for several weeks now.
I am upstream on these packages, and, honnestly, it takes few minutes to
check
them (only 3 files of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com
* Package name: lazr.uri (binary package python-lazr-uri)
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : lazr developers: https://launchpad.net/~lazr-developers
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.uri
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 21:37 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11782 March 1977, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
This is a proposal to formalize a set of meta-information
to be embedded in patches applied to Debian packages. Most
patch systems allow for a free-from description preceeding
the content
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello,
it looks like we quickly converged on something relatively well accepted.
Current version: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
Thanks for working on this Raphael, I am glad to see it moving.
I have a few comments, but overall I like the current proposal. It is
gregor herrmann wrote:
I agree that that's not completely obvious/intuitive for newcomers
but consumers of the patch format (command line tools, web
interfaces, ...) are free to expand them to URLs, and those
interfaces are probably more used than the raw source packages by the
people who are
Guido Günther wrote:
I am concerned that just allowing to use git-format-patch will result in
people not making an effort to markup other metadata in DEP#3 format,
like bug numbers or reviewers and leave those as free-form in the body.
We can have Forwarded:, Origin:, Received-by: in this
Guido Günther wrote:
Which isn't a problem on patch-queue branches since you either can
recreate them anytime from what's in debian/patches or simply ammend the
commit. They're supposed to be rebased frequently anyway.
Supposed?
That's not true in my opinion. It would tend to be hostile to
Jonathan Yu wrote:
I'd like to see a feature to use cowbuilder's chroot instead, though I
don't know of the technical challenges there. Certainly such a feature
would make it easier to use and thus run more often.
That would be useful. It requires adding explicit support in piuparts
(with the
Ben Finney wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
As I understand it, A enhances B has (more or less) the same
effect as B suggests A. Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
be redundant.
A plugin enhances the
of these, but specialised for Debian packaging,
so that the patches are stored under debian/patches, and the information
about them is stored in the vcs. However I can't come up with a design
that I like, or even pin down the features that it should have properly.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID
of the appropriate version number.
Also, I guess you are opening up the possibility of creating a source
package containing both a .tar.gz and .diff.gz, which will also confuse
some tools I expect.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
faster than I file them anyway ;)
You mean like this one?
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:46 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
There would be some need for inter-distro work here, maybe... any ideas
on where to discuss that much welcome ;)
distributi...@lists.freedesktop.org would be a good place to start.
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:19 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
All in all, things are in a rather good shape but I still need some help.
While I tested extensively the dpkg-source side, we still need to ensure
that all our additional tools cope well with the new source package
format
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 17:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
There's nothing to specify here, dpkg-source uses all additional tarballs
that match the regexp (exactly like it identifies the .orig tarball
currently).
bzr-builddeb will endeavour to provide the .orig.tar.gz for a format 1
package, so
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:07 +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
And how do you store that in a VCS if a second tarball includes files
that actually overwrite files of the main orig tarball. At build time
directories in the main orig tarball are supposed to be overwritten by
the part tarball but if
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 09:24 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
If bzr-builddeb wants to provide the tarballs, they must have been
injected at some point (otherwise you won't provide pristine tarballs)
and you could record the additional information at that point.
That is almost true, except for
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:30 +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Imagine an orig tarball with a config directory and an orig part-tarball
named orig-config.tar.whatever. The second tarball would overwrite
what's in the config dir of the first one when executing dpkg-source -x.
If you just store that
On (24/10/07 09:50), Bastian Blank wrote:
13 loop-aes305
Deprecated by dm-crypt.
Not entirely true. However it is not going to go in to upstream, so the
effect is the same.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 10:19 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Dirty history is not only tolerated, but the *only* sane option with,
lesse... rcs cvs svn darcs tla baz (bzr?)
bzr supports both ways of working, either cleaning up, or preserving
the history as is.
It has rebase support through a
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:56 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Bazaar currently suffers from #454313, but has reverse dependencies
which prevent its sane removal from testing. It looks to me that bazaar
is unmaintained upstream, the last 4 uploads in Debian are NMUs, and
almost nobody is using it
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 15:38 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I happened to see a similar bug filed against backuppc.
How many of these bugs have been filed?
Are you aware of the Debian policy regarding mass bug filing [1]?
I have filed two (from memory). I am aware of that policy.
IMO this is a
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:05 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
OK. I don't not remember that. A pointer to that discussion would be
useful. You only included a link to a Ubuntu web page which is IMO not
directly relevant when proposing structural changes in Debian (or at
least: does not provide
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 23:18 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
No, if the pages exist and other pages tend to treat them as
interesting (i.e. interesting pages link to those pages), Google is
working as advertised if it indexes and reports them.
On unactivated account pages launchpad now sets
meta
to answer my own questions.
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:29 +0100, James Westby wrote:
Therefore I'd like to ask a few questions:
1. Are there any objections to the approach that have not already
been raised in the thread?
It doesn't appear so.
2. Does anyone feel that the objections mean
On Tue Dec 15 16:26:12 + 2009 Steffen Moeller wrote:
Hello,
I just received a request to upload a series of packages for Debian that
are already available for Ubuntu.
Is there a policy document on how to give appropriate credit for the
original work? What if the version we are going
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:29:01 +1100, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Specifically, a behaviour of *recognising* that a package is in source
format 1.0. That's a fact of that package in that state, that shouldn't
change just because time has passed.
In other words, a source
, and it turned out to
be caused by something that seemed completely unrelated. Unfortuanately
I cannot remember what. Helpful eh?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
On (17/08/06 00:57), Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On 2006-08-17 00:53:16, James Westby wrote:
You could see if chmod u+x configure in your debian/rules fixes it,
but
it shouldn't be necessary.
How I am going to do that? configure is in the tar.gz.diff file and
What file is that? Do you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: bazaar-webserve
Version : Unknown
Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli kreijack AT inwind DOT it
* URL : http://goffredo-baroncelli.homelinux.net/bazaar-dev/
* License : GPL
the upload ettiquete should be. There is no now,
version, no bugs, and the packaging is fine. Do I try and find a sponsor
just for a change of maintainer, or do I wait until there is something
to do?
Let me know what you would like to do,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
to trigger
that particular debate).
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On (08/10/06 17:22), Uwe Hermann wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 10:36:25PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If you have exim installed, you must either install postfix or write an
exim policy, as none currently exists.
Is this still the case? It seems that it would be odd
, but if the user tries to reconfigure exim4 they
will be directed to the correct package.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Changed-By: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com
Description:
bzr-builddeb - bzr plugin for Debian package management
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 614125 616786 619614
Changes:
bzr-builddeb (2.6) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ James Westby ]
.
* Don't fail if asked to use a .bz2 tarball that is already
Changed-By: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com
Description:
bzr-builddeb - bzr plugin for Debian package management
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 572093
Changes:
bzr-builddeb (2.4.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Colin Watson ]
* Consider a .dsc without a Format: to be Format: 1.0.
.
[ Jelmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:25:49 +0100
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:03:03 +0100
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:27:37 +
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.93
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:25:27 +0100
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.90
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby
Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
python-debian - python modules to work with Debian-related data formats
Closes: 429299 429357
Changes:
python-debian (0.1.3) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ James Westby ]
* changelog.py
- Add max_blocks parameter to Changelog constructor. This limits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:34:30 +0100
Source: seccure
Binary: seccure
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED
Maintainer: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libsds-dev - development file for libsds
libsds0- primary lib for SDS
libsomaplayer-dev - development file for libsomaplayer
libsomaplayer0 - primary lib for somaplayer
somaplayer - player
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:42:20 +0100
Source: seccure
Binary: seccure
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:56:44 +
Source: python-debian
Binary: python-debian
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:15:42 +
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.14
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:16:28 +
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.15~rc1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:13:52 +0100
Source:
Binary:
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:03:53 +0100
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:04:09 +0100
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:41:18 +0100
Source: seccure
Binary: seccure
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:33:27 +0100
Source: seccure
Binary: seccure
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:29:08 +0100
Source: bzr-builddeb
Binary: bzr-builddeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.95
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bazaar Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Westby
-By: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com
Description:
ipx- utilities to configure the kernel ipx interface
libncp - shared library used by programs that use NetWare Core Protocol
libncp-dev - libncp: development libraries and header files
libpam-ncp - PAM module allowing
Changed-By: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com
Description:
bzr-builddeb - bzr plugin for Debian package management
Closes: 463349 493386 497415 497416 498622 500851 515921 517869
Changes:
bzr-builddeb (2.1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Merge the tags from the upstream branch when doing
Changed-By: James Westby james.wes...@ubuntu.com
Description:
bzr-builddeb - bzr plugin for Debian package management
Changes:
bzr-builddeb (2.1.1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Make get-orig-source priority higher than uscan. Thanks Martin Pitt.
(LP: #339343).
* Correct variable
68 matches
Mail list logo
