Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nick Andrik
I have packaged and uploaded the latest version (2.2.1) of acetoneiso on debian
mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=acetoneiso
Now I am looking for a sponsor to review the package and upload it
> That reminds me. Is there a way to get blhc to tell me *which* line in a
> build log makes it think that compiler flags are hidden?
I agree that would be really useful
> https://buildd.debian.org/~brlink/packages/r/remctl.html is reporting that
> the compiler flags are hidden. So far as I kno
2013/5/28 Adam Borowski :
> If you don't read it, you get a reminder every login.
If you login in command line, which is not the default case for desktop systems.
--
=Do-
N.AND
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Would it be that you need this?
DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
--
=Do-
N.AND
2013/6/25 Ritesh Raj Sarraf :
> Hi,
>
> Following the Hardening wiki, I have build-dep the hardening-includes
> package and enabled the hardening flags as follows :
>
> rrs@zan:/var/tm
Or probably this section for older debhelper:
http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough#Older_debhelper
--
=Do-
N.AND
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.o
2013/7/2 Russ Allbery :
> I don't believe the AGPL was ever intended to be used for libraries.
> Quite a bit of the license is very difficult to interpret as applied to a
> library. (For example, does that mean that every application using the
> library has to provide a URL to download the source
I have worked in the past year a bit with unrar-nonfree, mainly
because I wanted rar (cbr) support in calibre.
I would be happy having a drop-in replacement, if this is possible,
but I don't know how easy this is for calibre.
The way it works there, is that calibre links against libunrar and
expect
2013/1/10 Paul Wise :
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Nick Andrik wrote:
>
>> Recently I was trying to convert the debian/copyright file of a
>> non-free package ( unrar-nonfree ) to 1.0 format.
>> The main license of this software is non-free (mainly because it d
>> I guess you meant
>> > unrar-nonfree can probably be removed from Debian now that we have
>> > unrar-free?
>
> Definitely not, since unrar-free does not support the RAR format
> versions that unrar-nonfree or unar support. I suggest we can probably
> remove unrar-free and unrar-nonfree now that
I'm trying to work with a source package that builds packages that
includes both binaries and dynamic libraries.
My question is on how to enable hardening in both of them, but PIE
support only in the binary (since libraries use PIC anyway).
My solution so far is something like this:
~~
Now I see, thanks a lot for your answer
Nick
--
=Do-
N.AND
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cann5kouix-dlj6xnfqqeftnmzdxo1dtm7ebege6eauftywc...@mail.g
2013/5/3 Josselin Mouette :
> There is a solution to both the upload bandwidth problem and the the
> problem that buildd binaries are untested, but I’m afraid it implies
> changes to dak.
>
> This means configuring dak to accepting only two types of uploads:
> - source-only uploads
> They a
2014/1/9 Osamu Aoki :
> Hi,
>
> == Short version ==
> I want to update PO files with Ubuntu site data. So far no luck. Help
> needed.
>
> == Long story ==
> One of my packages got a translation bug report pointing me to:
>
> https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+source/im-config/+pot
2014/1/9 Nick Andrik :
> I attach this file for your convenience
The link I forgot:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/162016788/launchpad-export.tar.gz
--
=Do-
N.AND
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
2014/1/9 Martin Bagge / brother :
> And the license on those strings are?
> I have a old memory in the back of my head about Rosetta strings not
> being importable into Debian because of something.
>
> Easy detail to forget, or maybe the situation is better now.
All translations submitted directly
15 matches
Mail list logo
