.
The conference was attended by these printer manufacturers:
Glen Petrie (EPSON)
David Chamberlin (Kyocera)
And these developers:
Kai-Uwe Behrmann (CinePaint)
Ralph Giles (Ghostscript)
Jody Goldberg (GNOME-Print)
Till Kamppeter (Foomatic/xpp)
Hin-Tak Leung (epsonepl)
Roger Leigh
by the infrastructure or by policy.
ACK. I certainly care about security, and I'll sign my packages just
as soon as debsign supports it.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org
).
BTW, are there any good reasons why the autobuilders don't use the
packaged version anywat? The differences are minimal.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:02:36AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
(the cvs, not deb
through the remaining
huge diff by hand will take some time.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt
.
Specifically regarding bullets: We now have UTF-8 encoded control
files, so why not simply use the UCS bullet character (U+2022)?
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:01:52AM +, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The attached text is a first draft of a proposed extension
in there. /dev/shm is reserved.
Because of this, it's *actively harmful* for /dev/shm to be used by
initscripts, or indeed anything except the glibc POSIX shm_*() and
sem_() implementation.
Where was it ever written down that any package could use /dev/shm?
They can't.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Dec 18, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How strongly can I put this? /dev/shm is for *shared memory*, not for
random junk. /dev/shm is for POSIX shared memory and semaphores
/dev/shm is a tmpfs
are talking about.
On the contrary, he made several good points, which you would do well
to fully consider before dismissing them out of hand.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
[no need to CC me; I'm subscribed to the list]
On Dec 18, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian guarantees that it exists on debian systems.
But what about the future, and what about it being
wants to test them.
I did file a bug about tmpfs size limits (#344001), but this is really
a wishlist item.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org
, since there are many other uses
too for a tmpfs.
There are many uses for an ext3fs, but that doesn't mean we only have
one ext3 filesystem. What exactly is your reasoning here?
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Dec 19, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay.
But it has no reason to go away either
pretty. Sure, you can call it
handwaving, but to me it's something that's going to break at some
point in the future. I can't believe you are condoning that,
especially when the fix is so simple.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Dec 19, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With this example, it's trivial to trigger namespace conflicts and
break shm_open(). mkdir /dev/shm/foobar, for example, or create a
symbolic link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any other defenders of /lib/run? Of /run?
I prefer /run. It certainly doesn't belong in /lib (IMO).
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
for /run (or /lib/run or whatever)
being empty at the end of the boot process, and complain if it isn't
(possibly also remounting it r/o so abusers break noisily).
Wouldn't that break mtab, or will that be moved under /var at the end
of booting?
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing
for being written in C
using GLib/GObject. I have however spent the last week converting it
to C++, and I'm just finishing that up now.]
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ke, 2005-12-21 kello 10:28 +, Roger Leigh kirjoitti:
For this task, you might find schroot(1) useful. It's a means of
accessing chroot environments, but it supports LVM snapshots as one
method.
Does
of.
The fact of being group-maintained /should/ make it simpler for
third-party changes to get into a package anyway (since there are more
maintainers to review and commit changes). This should lessen the
need for 0-day NMUs.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux
/dev.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
to use debmake.
---
I should remove last sentence from all translations.
It might be better changing it to It is a bug to use debmake in new
packages. New packages using debmake will be rejected from the
archive.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp
them for the time they took to identify and
investigate a bug. I treat both fellow developers and non-developers
the same in this respect.
Realistically, what more can we do?
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
?
If the partition table is being changed, the tool that changed it
should issue a BLKRRPART ioctl, like fdisk does for example (see
linux/fs.h).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
own I see that each upload has been by a different person
almost every time, which makes it difficult to firstly know who I
should contact, and secondly I have doubts about their familiarity
with the package if there's no one who really cares for it.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
for my own package, because each time it has
been uploaded to Ubuntu it was done my a different person, so I don't
know who I should be cooperating /with/. For large and important
packages, this isn't a problem, but for others it's difficult.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the
first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right at
the limits of many peoples tolerance. Pull another one again, I may
be forced to file a request for your expulsion. That might happen for
this one yet.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 08:40, Roger Leigh wrote:
Andrew, do you understand just how inappropriate and offensive your
mail was? Nothing justifies abuse of our lists like that. d-d-a is a
widely-read list both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
If you still can't take the hint, I'll be more blunt: this isn't the
first crass stunt you've pulled by any means, and you are now right
are discarded, rather than being merged back into the Debian
changelog (though I can appreciate this is not an easy problem to
solve in an automated fashion).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
to see memory usage; this should show any memory
hogs. (Acroread is a likely candidate.)
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key
require and uphold
the same set of freedoms of both, which obviously includes the ability
to modify without restrictions on what is modifiable.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
.
Is the docbook toolchain is yet robust enough to be able to do that?
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign
/;
it's not hard to see long-term maintenance problems with this. See
the debian-vote archives for more detail.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key
. For the second, I remain to be
convinced that documentation is less deserving of freedom than
software.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key
schroot.
- Recommend cdebootstrap rather than debootstrap.
* debian/README.Debian: Update information about src-deps and schroot.
-- Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:13:23 +
sbuild (0.37) unstable; urgency=low
* Sync with upstream SVN:
- avg-pkg-build-time, avg
maintainer scripts do not, with some removing
perhaps .dpkg-old only. This is inconsistent, and it would be nice to
have some guidelines or recommendations about how maintainers should
handle conffile cleanup, so that maintainer scripts could do it more
reliably and uniformly.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh wrote:
Until last month, dpkg forgot about conffiles which were removed or
moved on package upgrade. As a consequence, maintainers had to
remember to purge these conffiles by hand in the package postrm
script.
I just want to highlight
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh wrote:
Until last month, dpkg forgot about conffiles which were removed or
moved on package upgrade. As a consequence, maintainers had to
remember to purge these conffiles by hand in the package postrm
this for chroots would be for syslog
packages to provide a file e.g. /etc/schroot/setup.d/50syslog which
would create the socket on the fly when the chroot is used. This does
require using schroot to access chroots, however.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux
setup?
I certainly have read the docs from CVS, but I'm stuck at the
installation stage. I can see what installs where from the debian/*
packaging, but what I need to do to setup the archive and database
isn't clear.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Liberty and Livelihood - Support
and foomatic-bin are re-built.
I'll be uploading new cupsys-driver-gimpprint packages in a few days,
once I've rebuilt and fully tested it. In the mean-time, installing
libcupsimage2 should make it work again.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp
.)
This works fine when the locales exist for each localisation, but if
they don't exist, it defaults to C locale/US-ASCII charset. Can the
autobuilders guarantee a full set of generated locales, or is only C
available?
Thanks,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp
necessary.
That's fine--I can just generate those that I really need (~20).
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
this not allow to have
several packages, each targetted for different processors?
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
(and FHS) will allow the use of libexec some
day...
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
) appropriate. There
is no technially valid reason for doing this, since the conffiles and
symlinks that might exist are known by name.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
...
I contacted the SRM about the possibility of inclusion of gimp-print
4.2.5-1woody0 in a point release, but I've not had any reply yet. It
doesn't meed the usual criteria for a stable
be the case that they are co-ordinating
better, but there was some disagreement between the maintainers, which
led to the initial fork.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
state.
If you can't get the basic Gimp-Print CUPS driver going as above,
please file a bug report against cupsys-driver-gimpprint.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign
/printdef $(srcdir)/printers.xml print-printers.c
CLEANFILES = print-printers.c
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
to be set rather higher than it is at the moment, and if it doesn't
add any value over existing equivalents or have much general use it
doesn't get in.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
in any way.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5
to UTF-8 (where
it makes sense).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP
embedded
currently). I also have uses for it in other projects, where libxml2
is not suitable.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key
many different things. Perhaps you mean it implements ISO-6429
(ECMA-48) SGR control sequences, or maybe something entirely
different? Either way, it would help if you were much more specific.
(This applies equally to the other ITP.)
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing
three bugs in the NMUs.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed
to that... would it be acceptable to upload the new stable
libpqxx release (2.0.0) built against 7.4 once 7.4 has entered
unstable. It would be fantastic to have the new libpqxx in sarge,
too.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
-built
library to be installed for shlibdeps to be computed).
This sort of automated source building is a very good idea--it will
root out a lot of build bugs, and will improve the quality of Debian.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Roger Leigh wrote:
In late 2001, I spent several weekends hand-building quite a large
chunk of woody (over 200 source packages). I found quite a number of
serious bug in several packages, including missing Build-Deps
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apt-fu installs binary packages of build-depends first to avoid circular
build-dependencies, and then builds and installs the build-depends from
source if -R
to get ENOSPC than a
kernel panic. The installer could pick a sensible limit based on, for
example, 20% of the combined core+swap size.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your
with an alternate name, which didn't have such unpleasant
and unholy connotations. I don't have any good ideas as or an
alternative right now--it's worse than a tiebreaker!
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
be hard
pushed to find another book with Manw, Orom, etc. in it.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[I am not subscribed to debian -bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:30:48PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Nathan Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not opposed to anything else you've said. I do believe these
particular names are a bad idea, however
from pkg-config or should I just
parse the .pc file myself?
The .pc file needs converting to use Libs.private for libraries which
are only indirect dependencies.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/4/06, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to get sane output from pkg-config or should I just
parse the .pc file myself?
The .pc file needs converting to use Libs.private
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Even then, -lgtk-x11-2.0 still needs to come from the Requires, but
should still be private. For this, a Requires.private would be the
best solution (but its Cflags should still remain public). This
needs implementing in pkg-config
in an unclean
build environment.
Because tools like sbuild need a dsc, I always build the package on
the host and then rebuild the new .dsc/.diff.gz in the sbuild chroot.
This ensures it will build in both environments, and also ensures the
source will unpack and autobuild properly.
--
Roger Leigh
patching up
abandoned code.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgpLnhU6VP8R7.pgp
,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgptOJO1gUca3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
: error: expected ',' or ';' before
'{' token
You've probably hit #340871: [m68k] packages ftbfs due to mathinline.h
in libc6-dev. I posted a patch there, but it needs someone with both
m68k glibc knowledge to complete the work.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgpDdFCMmwvkg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
things easier.
While historical reasons are acceptable for users' dotfiles, I remain
to be convinced that there is a logical rationale for them in any
system location, or even anywhere under $HOME except the root.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http
that 99 char limitation.s
Why can't dpkg use the newer ustar or pax formats?
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign
from sources and have exactly the same problem. For what it's worth,
I have exactly the same problem in fedora core 5, but not on Fedora
Corre 4.
They both have the lesstif widget toolkit in common. That's probably
where the bug lies.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http
is found, please report it
and it will get fixed. It can't be fixed if the maintainer is not
made aware that there is a problem.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org
be GPL (or
compatible with the GPL). That is, the mechanism used to build GPL
code is an intrinsic part of a GPL licensed work, and so cannot be
licensed in an incompatible manner.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh
0720 europa FAIL (no GCC 4.1; libstdc++ iterator bug)
All the failures after 0.2.10 are due to the buildd not having g++-4.1
installed.
After this is fixed, please could you requeue schroot for a rebuild?
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http
packages. As an example, there are many packages not registering
their documentation with doc-base, and doc-base itself could do with
some work on better supporting documentation formats other than HTML.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http
building and allow individual users root
access to individual xen hosts.
[I need the powerpc support so I can run a Xen system; if anyone else
wanted to take up the challenge, it could be done much sooner.]
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http
schroot to
manage the chroot). I prefer it to pbuilder, but I may be a little
biased ;-)
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848
/schroot
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgpvazcFrBsYK.pgp
would even pay the first hour!
Please keep non-constructive messages and flaming off debian-devel
(and the same applies to you, Joerg Schilling). Take this off
debian-devel to private mail or to a more appropriate list.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
netkit-inetd is doable.
Any thoughts or comments?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 10, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
installed, all using the same configuration file. Is this a use
case we really want to support? Are there really setups running
multiple inetds for a good reason? Having a virtual
A good reason
to leave it installed by default for etch, I
think fixing up all inetd-using packages to have proper dependencies,
and then removing the dependency from netbase would be a worthy goal
for etch+1.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
It would be good to get rid of inetd from the basic install at all. Those
No, it would not. UNIX systems are supposed to have an inetd installed.
I see no reason why *Debian* systems should have an inetd
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ijs-dev
Version : 0.33
Upstream Author : Raph Levien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.linuxprinting.org/ijs
* License : MIT
Description : IJS raster image transport
, but what I have done so far is
available from http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rl117/buildd/
(source and i386 debs).
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:52:48AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Does anyone who uses buildd/wanna-build/rbuilder have any comments? I
don't yet have a big enough HDD to run an autobuilder offline, so I
have not tried to use it yet. I
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:40:32AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
On 14 Apr 2002, Roger Leigh wrote:
I have added autoconf/make support, and repackaged it using debhelper.
Whoa. I tried the same two years ago, and failed. That's why I started a
rewrite in C++, based on APT, which should
is fixed.
--
Roger Leigh
** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 11:27 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
Roger Leigh wrote:
This mail is just to test the water to see if there is any interest in
forming a printing group
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
Rob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 11:27 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
Roger Leigh wrote:
This mail is just to test the water to see
in unstable (gcc272). Does anyone actually use
this anymore, or could it be removed for etch?
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign
://people.debian.org/~rleigh/Screenshot.png
Galeon is also similarly afflicted. It's either a GTK+ bug, or a
Radeon bug (ati driver).
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
gimp-print (renamed to gutenprint) is near its 5.0 release. I've
uploaded a prerelease to experimental, which is also available here:
Hi Roger
any maintainers of printing or
printing-related packages to subscribe to debian-printing.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key
1 - 100 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo
