On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:10:51AM -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
After the actual error I got with apachetop:
debian:~# apachetop -f /var/log/apache/access.log
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xb7da08c8 ***
Aborted
I want to learn how to debug and see what went wrong. How
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:51:51AM +0100, G?rkan wrote:
* Package name: moleinvasion
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Guillaume Chambraud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://moleinvasion.tuxfamily.org/
* License : GNU General Public License, version 2
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 09:05:58AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
It doesn't tackle the issue of dpkg _not_ storing filesystem permissions.
This makes it not feasible to easily recover the system after a 'chmod -R
go-rwx /' besides reinstalling all the packages (that's why I
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:16:01PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
That's what Tiger calls 'signatures'. It's pretty easy to do at the moment,
but I have not updated signatures for Debian for quite some time. If you
intend to keep a database you also have to consider that for
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:50:11PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
Missed that mail. I remember the discussion on what should checksecurity
include though. Please notice I have include many of the modules we wanted
in Tiger.
It may have been a private mail; the way I remember
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 10:11:48PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Maybe the maintainer just has no clue about how UTF should work in
that particular application and can't do much about it other than wait
until upstream has a clue and implements it.
I'm in this position, I'm upstream and
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:04:10PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Why not? Testing would be my personal choice for running a desktop (or
laptop) Linux, were I not otherwise involved with Debian development.
The only bad thing is the non-existent security (I could live with
occasional critical
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:20:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I haven't seen it be shot down. I've seen people saying the
infrastructure's there, it's just that nobody's actually doing the
updates, though.
Yes I've seen this mentioned previously also. If it's a matter of
finding people it
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:24:03PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Pre-plans in this case means that two people (one DD and one NM) have
been talking about it seriously. So, if you want to shoot the idea
down, go ahead, no harm done :) And if someone else is thinking about
picking up the ball, go
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
I filed a few days ago:
#193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
#193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
#193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:39:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If a member of the sec-team says Yes, we are actively trying to
find
new members, but finding competent and responsive people who have
the
time and will to help is very difficult, then I'm happy and shut
up.
Well,
A long time ago[1] I asked if there was a list of all the setuid/setgid
binaries contained in the previous Debian stable release.
As there still isn't such a list I've created one and placed it online
with a simple search form.
(This is the list that my recent spate of bug reporting
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 05:30:11PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
If you're just scanning for binaries with s bits set, then you'll
probably miss all the ones that use whatever that tool was
(suidmanager?) that was used by some packages before we had
dpkg-statoverride.
Yes I know that I'm
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:55:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I'd like to see us move all of our setgid games (except, perhaps,
nethack) away from using global score files by default.
I think that should be a good option, but I can see several
games that might suffer by it.
I'm loath to
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:20:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
what's wrong with a low-priority debconf question with a sane default?
Absolutely nothing at all, but it's a slippery slope, and I thought
we were tending towards less interactivity in installations?
Steve
--
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:18:53AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I also think it would be a good idea for policy to require all setuid/gid
bit grants to go through this or another list for peer review, much as
pre-depends are supposed to.
I absolutely support this idea. All set[ug]id
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:16:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Only because Steve Kemp is doing some good work on auditing our games.
I suspect he would have just as much luck finding security holes in some
other areas.
I've mostly covered the games now, there's not too many left that I
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:58:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Given the last review of a setgid program, I wonder if two
people are enough. The mistake was simple, human, and undesrtandable,
but the review does not in fact talk about any flaws in the current
version of angband
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 03:14:23AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Surely two people would be an improvement over the current situation, where
there is no review at all. Our demonstration has shown how one person can
discover some common flaws with a relatively brief review.
*Exactly*. Well
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:44:07AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I don't know the current average time for a NM to get
through the queue but I would guess at it being around 3-4 months.
How can that be with the DAM only accepting a few people every 6
month or so? Whats the average
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:18:50PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
El s??b, 09-10-2004 a las 00:04 -0500, Branden Robinson escribi??:
It's time to fork. Let us work with the rest of the community to
standardize on a new set of tools based on the last free version of
cdrtools, thank
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:13:36AM +0200, nicklas (smurfd) wrote:
I have had a package idea, for a long time now. The idea, was a
package, containing a Flush-all firewall script. Adding this script to
be ran at bootup. Just for the simplicity. I tend to keep forgetting to
add it myself.
I
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:49:21PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
This is an intent to mass-file bugs as required per custom.
Bugs will be filed:
1) on packages that include GNU Free Documentation Licensed-material;
2) on packages in 1) that do not include the copyright or license of
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:37:01PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 10:53:10PM +0100, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: unlzx
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 11:35:22AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
apt-get and apt-cache are my friends, and I love them for letting me
specify what I want to do in a way that is intuitive to me. Altough I
wish I could tab-complete package names sometimes. ^_^
If you're running bash you can
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:43:11PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
==
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:33:43 +0100
From: martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#285625: ITP: expocity -- An enanced Window Manager
based on
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:01:24PM -0500, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
So, I humbly request suggestions or hints as to a direction I can
follow to be able to get the source cod and development tree (READ Not
CVS Tree) of say package PostgresSQL.
I have tried variations of -
apt-get
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Well, I'm not the software vendor here..:-)
As far as I've inderstood, this product induces some interaction at
kernel-level and the vendor developers may have concerns about the
kernel on the distribution they want to
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:36:04PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
And a question: where do we collect this kind of tips?
wiki.debian.net
debian-administration.org
debianplanet.org
debianhelp.org
And any page that's accessible to google!
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
You can browse our bug database at http://bugs.debian.org/. A good way
to start is to search for any bugs in software you regularly use, and to
see if you can help out.
But what could one do, if the maintainer doesn't
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:41:48PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
If a bug is serious, and not a trivial thing, and if a patch has
been filed then a NMU could be applied.
But only a Debian developer can do so, right?
Usually, but I've sponsored NMU uploads by non-DDs before.
When
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:33:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Why don't you add an option to load newer rulesets and/or update
information to snort. Once a day/week/month snort you probe some url
for a signed ruleset or news file and report to the user about any
updates.
That way
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 09:50:14AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
I did not realize the full context of what you were trying to do from your
initial question. You're proposing a fundamental change from a process that is
static and noninteractive (so that build daemons will work, package building
is
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
Any suggestions ?
/etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd
This script rotates all the files which are output from
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:24:37AM +1000, Kim Lester wrote:
There is no way to verify/correct the MODE, USER, GROUP, TYPE
of any files installed in a pkg.
That appears to be the case, partly because permissions may be changed
from those files which are contained withing the .deb file via
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:13:49AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
With the perl 5.8.1 package, the line input operator () causes
Bad file descriptor. This problem is reproducible by the
following sample code.
#!/usr/bin/perl
$file = /etc/debian_version;
open(FH, $file) or die
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
All he had to do was install an older version of libc6 and every other package
would have been happy. All the infrastructure is there to do this, the old
packages are all on the ftp/http sites, the package may even be sitting in
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:20:26PM +0100, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cdcat
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Peter Deak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cdcat.sf.net
*
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 05:03:59PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
- uptimed (sponsor needed for Daniel Gubser, who helped out)
I will sponsor Daniel; or failing that I'd take it over
myself. Whichever you both prefer.
Steve
--
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:24:58AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Great to hear. I started a web page at http://debian-enterprise.org/.
Aren't we still waiting for clarification on the use of Debian
in domain names, etc? As highlighted by the Adamantix name changed?
And as I put on the web
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:48:57AM -0800, bruce wrote:
Our goals:
* Provide Project Management
* Provide a Development Network of Servers
* Provide Test Servers
* Allow users to configure Test Servers as Required
* Allow users to build/execute/test their code on the Test Servers
I wasn't going to post this, but it might be relevent to the
ongoing custom distribution stuff that's happening.
I've been experimenting with producing a hardened Debian derivitive
as a small piece of paid work. This mostly means compiling things with
a stackguard compiler, using
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:10:44PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:39, Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
? I've been experimenting with producing a hardened Debian derivitive
?as a small piece of paid work. ?This mostly means compiling things with
?a stackguard compiler
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
That's what the debian-cd package is for.
Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for :)
Steve
--
Will code for food.
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:20:19AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
I believe that our GCC packages already have propolice patched in but not
enabled. Therefore it should be a much easier change to make for it to be
included.
This is true, debian/patches has a line for
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Jakob Lell wrote:
maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody
and
uses kernel and gcc patches to improve security. At the moment you need to
install a normal Debian woody and then upgrade. However, you might create
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:18:54PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
The only idea I've come up with is to put the name of
the corresponding subdirectory before each changelog.
Is there anyone who has resolved this problem in another
way?
I just took the main one and used that.
Some
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:09:59PM +0100, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
Is there any way to querry how long a X-user is idle? If not, do you
think it's okay to write something like IDLE-Logout does not work
with X into Readme.Debian and into the config-file(,manpage, ...)?
I'm not sure to be
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:44:55PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote:
``We''? Who is ``we''? It is unlikely that you are one of them royal people,
so
I take it you meant to say:
Adamantix is not what I want to do, what I want to do is to improve Debian.
That is correct, I agree with Russell.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:10:06PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
Let me know when you have an apt repository that's in a usable state and I'll
recommend it on my SE Linux web pages. I expect that anyone who is
interested in SE Linux will be interested in your work as well.
This work has
Hi,
Following the interest in my recent post about rebuilding
Debian from source using a patched compiler I thought I'd
announce the availability of gcc-3.3 with the SSP patches.
(SSP is the new name for the work formerly called ProPolice).
The packages may be downloaded via the
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:53:02PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
In fact, I want it to work as a native debian system. This way,
buildroot causes a lot of problems
Isn't this what 'apt-build' can be used for?
http://julien.danjou.info/article-apt-build.html
That allows you to rebuild
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libnet-httpserver-perl
Version : 1.1.1.
Upstream Author : Ryan Eatmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~reatmon/Net-HTTPServer/
* License : LGPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libapache2-mod-ifier
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/mod_ifier/
* License : GPL + Apache and SSL linking
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
I am building a package in which one of the binary has
to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
one of the following two is the more appropriate method
to use?
It looks like you've got the answer to this
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:21:03AM +0200, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
My proposal to satisfy both use-cases was, to provide two versions of
wordpress:
(1) wordpress -- depends on mysql-server
(2) wordpress-remotesql -- does not
How about:
Depends: mysql-remote-server | mysql-server
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:02:57AM -0600, Katrina Jackson wrote:
A. Ubuntu seems like it can get hardware support immeadiatly, but that
support never seems to quickly get to Debian. I have been using Ubuntu
since Debian doesn't wok on my laptop. Suspend doesn't work and my
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:37:11PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither Ubuntu nor Debian do anything special to get hardware support
that is provided by the kernel proper and tools that neither group
created.
That's not actually true. I do
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
How many Debian maintainers think the same? I'm sure there are a lot
of them who do not soffer of the this is my package, go away syndrome.
There is a small list of some people who accept them here:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:26:57AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
Wolfgang,
I think that is a great idea. You should make a post on
forums.debian.net to since that is another place many of the community
hang out. That's just my two cents.
Seconded. I put a simple advert on
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:26:41PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Why don't you create a web ring and place banners everywhere? (seriously)
There is a promote debian ring already:
http://spreaddebian.com/
I like to see related sites linking to each other, and I
like to see friendly
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 09:18:39AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I just posted a blog: blog.thedebianuser.org/?p=13, where I outline
how I feel: that working through examples using .diff files teaches how
to package better then trying to learn from documentation alone. The blog
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a definitive list of all the setuid/setgid
binaries which may be installed from the Debian archives.
(Such a list would be very useful in prioritizing any examination of
source code).
I've partially worked my way through the list of packages which are
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:31:01AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..last mirror update was a week ago, what's going on???
..and, yeah, gg:Debian mirror update 21-Jul-2005 etc
finds _lotsa_ noise.
..whether this mirror update lapse is planned or not, a wee
mention here on d-m and and on
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:58:33PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
I was finally able to acquire an SSP Build Host for you.
If you are still interest. Please contact me.
A bit quick off the mark there, Greg! I think I've replied to all
your previous mails within a day or two...?
Anyway for
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:12:56PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
The SSP compiler is a patch against GCC and offers Stack Smashing
Protection. In short it gives protection against buffer overflow
bugs, and attacks.
Steve, you are aware that GCC 4.1 will include a complete
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:25:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I am concerned that a version of Mozilla claiming to be an earlier will
eventually break user-installed extensions.
..
There really has to be a better way.
The time to make suggestions was probably when Joey asked for
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:17:32AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I wish more women would join Debian and the lists. My experience is that
usually there's not that much aggressiveness when there are women around.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:07:26PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
But if apt-proxy is still installed and running when apt-proxy starts
up, it will fail because the port is in use. Should I make the approx
package conflict with apt-proxy? Both packages allow the port to be
changed to something
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 05:39:10PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Email is realtime. I receive mails much more quickly than five minutes
on average; within seconds, typically, even for round-trips to many
mailing lists.
Email may appear to be realtime, and you may even expect it to
be
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 03:08:38PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Email may appear to be realtime, and you may even expect it to
be because this is frequently how it works. But this is not guaranteed.
The RFC requires best effort.
Sure
On Fri Jul 31, 2009 at 18:47:58 +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Who wrote debmirror? Without installing I can't find out since
only maintainers are listed in the PTS.
Look at the copyright file:
e.g.
On Fri Jun 22, 2007 at 20:24:22 +0200, ignatius wrote:
- Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes? Why it isn't upstream
developers?
Generally upstream developers *will* fix security holes, however
Debian users generally get their software from *us*.
So if we're shipping
On Sat Jun 30, 2007 at 18:43:36 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I would like to know if it is OK that I orphan pscan and open a
discussion about its removal.
I think it would be grossly rude to attempt to orphan a package
which you do not maintain which has no bugs against it. (Except
the
On Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 01:02:42 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
* There are 14 pages and the navigation is truncated to 'Page: 1 2 3 ..
14 '. Could you (optionally) display links to all pages? Or alter
the number of results per page (increase, or make user configurable)?
I'll change
On Sun Nov 23, 2008 at 17:59:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
- Send your private Debian GPG Key to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Include
the brand of your perfume and the color of the make-up.
I find it disappointing to see this posted, and in bad taste.
I'm sure I'm not alone.
Steve
--
On Sun Nov 23, 2008 at 19:52:46 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
- Send your private Debian GPG Key to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Include
the brand of your perfume and the color of the make-up.
I find it disappointing to see this posted, and in bad taste.
I found it generally
On Sun Nov 23, 2008 at 22:17:44 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
FWIW we had this discussion already:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00920.html
Could we fucking stop repeating the same old discussions over and over
and over ? every two year we troll about firmwares, bad
Yes, you are probably right: I don't understand how Nix may be useful for
Debian (and for GNU/Linux also).
That's too bad for you. Shallow thinking doesn't get you anywhere.
As promoter/recommender surely the onus is upon you to demonstrate:
1. Nix is good.
2. Nix is better than
On Thu Mar 12, 2009 at 22:37:41 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
- a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first line
of output of a specific command;
That is also possible in GNU Screen.
- a cleaner, modern, easily extended, BSD-licensed codebase.
That
On Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 11:54:23 -0500, Don wrote:
I am using sid and yesterday my update/upgrade broke iceape, synaptic, and
some others. I've had problems with libpango before, but this one has me
stumped. I don't see anyone else having this problem, so I must conclude
something is
On Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 00:43:46 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ firefox
/usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_impl
Interestingly the symbol is defined:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
On Fri Oct 19, 2007 at 17:36:21 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Allow me to point out the message at
http://blog.steve.org.uk/articles/2007/10/19/as-i-move-on-through-the-year
which is really a Bits from the Security Team.
Why is - once again - a message that I'd consider appropriate for
On Sat Oct 20, 2007 at 12:00:23 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2007-10-19 kello 18:29 +0200, Adrian von Bidder kirjoitti:
Seriously: I think exactly this kind of not really much new stuff going
on, but here's what we're continuing to do kind of information should be
more visible,
On Fri Oct 19, 2007 at 18:29:46 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
That you like pies is important.
:)
Though in the specific case of the security team, the flow of security
updates is an indication that the team is working
Yes, this is what I think too.
Could've cc:ed you at least.
On Wed May 14, 2008 at 10:21:18 +0200, BALLABIO GERARDO wrote:
If so, and if that was the ONLY entropy source used in generating keys,
then upstream openssl is (and has always been) just as broken as the
patched Debian package.
It wasn't.
Steve
--
Debian GNU/Linux System Administration
On Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 10:41:13 -0430, Ernesto Hernandez-Novich wrote:
Been there, done that, doesnt't work for these machines. The problem has
to do with the interaction of the card with IBM's IPMI controller, and
requires the latest Broadcom drivers.
What you want to do is install the
On Mon Aug 11, 2008 at 10:57:56 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
I set Severity into grave for this bug. The tableof discovered
problems is below.
Great work.
I don't think there should be any objection to a mass-filing for
security sensitive bugs - and from the sounds of
Great work. If you have the time to see if any of these are included
in stable (etch) please could you do so?
It might be that we'd need to release a security update, or at least
a package for the next point release. (I guess severity grave and
a tag of security will ensure the same
On Thu Sep 17, 2009 at 21:26:38 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
CURRENT SITUATION:
One can differ between three classes of packages:
0) Packages who do not download anything from the web.
1) Packages which download stuff but this is just normal data like
pidgin, firefox (I mean html
On Sun Jan 10, 2010 at 21:16:04 +0100, Andrzej Borucki wrote:
Exists archive debian-devel@lists.debian.org ?Steve
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/
Steve
--
http://www.steve.org.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:45:38PM +0100, John Talbut wrote:
Can anyone explain the official Debian set up for pwc based web cams?
..
The only Debian package for pwc is pwc-source . According to the copyright
information fro this package:
I've got one of these devices and found it
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:58:31AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The ones which haven't been picked up either with ITAs or in this thread,
and which aren't lib*-perl or lib*-ruby, are:
*
I'll take since it hasn't been claimed.
Steve
--
Debian GNU/Linux System Administration
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:13:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
I'll take since it hasn't been claimed.
I claimes it via ITA straight away, perhaps I should have emailed the
list as well sorry.
No problem, it was my fault for trusting the mail and not checking.
I'm always happy
I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a
bit of hiatus from project work.
Several packages are still unclaimed, although people have
offered on some of them. Please take a look at the list if
you're interested:
* debian-builder[O][O]
* driftnet
* dsniff
*
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
* flawfinder
* pscan
As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take
care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and pscan
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 06:22:14PM +0300, Al Nikolov wrote:
Is it possible for developers to subscribe to LWN as described in [1]? My
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] stay without any answer.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/13797/
Yes. Though it might take a while to get processed.
Steve
--
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
For this feature there are several scripts and tools around which use
this feature. Moreover if you want to make a net boot image where you
need to contact a other host easy there is no way to do this with debian
Linux so I have to
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Patrick Frank wrote:
But I have to manually edit /etc/apache-perl/httpd.conf and enable
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php aswell as
/etc/apache-perl/modules.conf
to add LoadModule php5_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp5.so.
Why do
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:16:25PM +0100, Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 11:55, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
What I don't really get is, why would we want a similar service in Debian?
We should already be pointing to the upstream site with the Homepage:
pseudo-header, and
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
