Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge1.2 (source i386 sparc amd64)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:41:49 +1000 Source: lynx Binary: lynx Architecture: source i386 sparc amd64 Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: James Troup

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge1.2 (source i386 sparc amd64)

2006-09-13 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:19:02AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:41:49 +1000 Source: lynx Binary: lynx Architecture: source i386 sparc amd64 Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1.2

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge1.2 (source i386 sparc amd64)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the third time this year that patch has been incorrectly ascribed to OpenBSD. Sorry for the misundertanding. I'll fix the lynx changelog file. I just used the patch from 2.8.5-2sarge2 in stable-security. ok. Perhaps you should

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge1.2 (source i386 sparc amd64)

2006-09-13 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:13:03AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the third time this year that patch has been incorrectly ascribed to OpenBSD. Sorry for the misundertanding. I'll fix the lynx changelog file. I just used the patch from