Re: Better infrastructure for dbgsyms

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Stefan Fritsch: >> Hi, >> >> [...] >> > > Hi, > > Thanks for improving dbgsym integration. :) > >> BTW, in some discussions some other questions were raised: >> >> - Is it really a good idea that foo-dbgsym depends on "foo

Re: Better infrastructure for dbgsyms

Thanks for your response, Niels, On Thu, 10 Aug 2017, Niels Thykier wrote: > > BTW, in some discussions some other questions were raised: > > > > - Is it really a good idea that foo-dbgsym depends on "foo (== > > foo-version)"? Wouldn't a Conflict or breaks on "foo (!= foo-version)" > > make

Re: Better infrastructure for dbgsyms

Stefan Fritsch: > Hi, > > [...] > Hi, Thanks for improving dbgsym integration. :) > BTW, in some discussions some other questions were raised: > > - Is it really a good idea that foo-dbgsym depends on "foo (== > foo-version)"? Wouldn't a Conflict or breaks on "foo (!= foo-version)" > make