Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Thomas Weber
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 08.08.2006, 02:28 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.: .These fonts canNOT be used with X11 or for printing. I suggest writing this as 'can NOT'. It's easier to parse and (with the idea of descriptions' translations in mind) comes closer to what happens in a translation -- at

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.: * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org dev@openoffice.org * URL : http://www.openoffice.org/ * License : GPL Description : Fonts for use

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Dienstag 08 August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alejandro Rios P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org dev@openoffice.org * URL :

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.: * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org dev@openoffice.org * URL : http://www.openoffice.org/ * License :

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package? The long term plan is for libming to be able to read in TTF fonts directly, but that's not there yet.

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:13 schrieb Stuart Anderson: On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package? The long term plan is for libming to be

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: Are those fonts manually converted? YOu didn't answer his question. Fair enough. The coffee hadn't quite kicked in yet. 8-) Are they manually converted? Or how are they converted? I wasn't sure what Alejandro had in mind, so I didn't want to

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:47 schrieb Stuart Anderson: Yes, the packages I have prepared are built as part of the rest of the ming package. The ming source package Build-depends on the package that contains the TTF fonts that will be converted into a libming font package. Upstream ming

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
close 381992 thanks Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:11 schrieb Stuart Anderson: On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.: * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it is the opensymbol font from ttf-opensymbol) then? Yes, that would be a better naming scheme. I was a

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:10 schrieb Stuart Anderson: On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it is the opensymbol font from

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: stable doesn't have the package anymore and oldstable is unsupported. And dist-upgrades skipping one release is not supported. But yes, I think so. If not, you can add a transitional package, although I won't like it because of the bogus name... So

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:32 schrieb Stuart Anderson: So this should cover it? Package: ming-fonts-opensymbol Conflicts: ming-fonts-openoffice Replaces: ming-fonts-openoffice Provides: ming-fonts-openoffice No, Replaces:/Povides:/Conflicts: libming-...

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Dienstag 08 August 2006 14:47 schrieb Stuart Anderson: Yes, the packages I have prepared are built as part of the rest of the ming package. The ming source package Build-depends on the package that contains the TTF fonts that will be converted into a libming font package. Upstream ming (and

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Would it be possible to convert them at installation time? Yes, it would be possible. There would be two essential options: 1. creation at installation time: - possibly only one package for all ming fonts (the tool) The tool is currently

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: No, Replaces:/Povides:/Conflicts: libming-... ^^^ important, because woody's package is named like that. for packages not yet in the archive (your ming-* you can do that

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Santiago José Ruano Rincón
Hi Stuart, El mar, 08-08-2006 a las 08:11 -0400, Stuart Anderson escribió: I already have package for these fonts prepared as part of the ming sounrce package, and am awaiting some feedback from some of the packages that will use them. Feedback from others would be welcome as well.

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread P.
Hello. I've talk to Stuart since a lot time ago about all this, but forgot to look over his late work on the fonts part that was missing. I tough that was a little bit more delyaed than it is. That is my fault for not checking and I'm sorry. Now I will test the fonts against my op-panel package,

Re: Bug#381992: ITP: libming-fonts-openoffice -- Fonts for use with the Ming Library for SWF Creation

2006-08-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Alejandro R?os P. wrote: Alejandro (in case you read that in the buglog since your ??%?? mailserver doesn't accept mail)... Well, it's not personal. It just the mailserver not accepting mail and that makes problems for reaching you (as in case for this ITP). As mail is to debian