Thibaut Paumard mlotpot.n...@free.fr writes:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Hi,
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1) multiarch
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 04:32 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
[..]
Since dpkg will prefer to install packages from the native
architecture, I don't see any problem here. I suppose I'm biased by
having actually tested this.
Ben.
But it is
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
just
to
Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl writes:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:33:45PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If there is no 64bit kernel in i386 then you can not safely enable
multiarch to install amd64 packages (in general, kernel my just
work). It is kind of a prerequisite.
qemu-user?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
metapackages to help with this already, but we still need users to
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
just
to have a suiteable kernel would be quite a burden.
The -amd64 kernel in i386 arch is some sort of upgrade tool.
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
just
to have a suiteable kernel would be quite a
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:33:45PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If there is no 64bit kernel in i386 then you can not safely enable
multiarch to install amd64 packages (in general, kernel my just
work). It is kind of a prerequisite.
qemu-user?
Of course, this particular combination is
Dear ftp-master,
I wonder if the solution below for transitioning ia32-libs to multiarch
would be OK in regards to DAK and testing transition etc. Any technical
problems why we couldn't make an exception for the 3 ia32-libs* packages
for this?
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Thu,
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
metapackages to help with this already, but we still need users to add
amd64 as a foreign architecture before
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
metapackages to help with this already, but we
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
From a user's point of view I'd really appreciate if that package could be
kept.
It is a burden for the archive and other infrastructure.
Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the
wrong packages
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120210 14:45]:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible.
* Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org [120210 14:47]:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the
wrong packages installed
Multi-arch enabled apt makes it hard to install the wrong ones. Also
they are
Goswin von Brederlow, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 15:53:35 +0100, a écrit :
3) What about stable users?
I don't see a way to transition stable users slowly. As said above I
intent to request removal of ia32-libs for wheezy. So there will be no
transition period where both ia32-libs and multiarch will
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de (09/02/2012):
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
0) make sure all packages are multiarchified.
To check that, I
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Hi,
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1) multiarch and ia32-libs are incompatible
[...]
What this
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 15:53:35 +0100, a écrit :
3) What about stable users?
I don't see a way to transition stable users slowly. As said above I
intent to request removal of ia32-libs for wheezy. So there will be no
transition
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:52:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of
22 matches
Mail list logo
