Hi Sam,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:36:37PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
see value
Le jeudi, 4 décembre 2014, 07.46:25 Bart Martens a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
freeze?
during freezes,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le jeudi, 4 décembre 2014, 07.46:25 Bart Martens a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
Would it be OK to
On 2014-12-04 08:46, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
freeze?
during freezes, where unstable should only
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:08:38PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Unfortunately, it is equally disruptive when people (despite best
efforts) misjudge the consequences of their upload. In such a case, you
would be depriving your fellow co-Debianites from the opportunity of
getting some patches
(Moving to debian-devel, please followup there)
Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
freeze? It is not the purpose of experimental to contain such
packages, of course. But it might be a less harmful
Didier == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org writes:
Didier (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
Didier Given the (current) small exposure of
Didier testing-proposed-updates (aka the repository has very few
Didier users, therefore the packages there get very few
On 03/12/14 15:36, Sam Hartman wrote:
You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
see value in avoiding changes to leaf packages in
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:36:37PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
Didier (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
Didier Given the (current) small exposure of
Didier testing-proposed-updates (aka the repository has very few
Didier users, therefore the packages there get very
Andrey,
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014, at 17:08, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:36:37PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
Didier (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
Didier Given the (current) small exposure of
Didier testing-proposed-updates (aka the
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:39:48PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi. You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
see value in
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
freeze?
during freezes, where unstable should only have
changes targeted at testing (and
12 matches
Mail list logo
