On Sep 13, Wolodja Wentland deb...@babilen5.org wrote:
The main problem I see is that there seem to be essentially two types of
packages in non-free right now, namely those that contain firmware/microcode
(etc) and are crucial for correctly working hardware and the rest.
Yes, this was duly
On Jo, 13 sep 12, 11:29:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
I think this should be mentioned somewhere *much* more prominent. I
consider myself pretty tech-savy, but only stumbled upon this just now
on the this list. Can a non-free package be made essential or
required? It seems there is really
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Also, we should mention somewhere (the install documentation?) that
non-free should be
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 13 sep 12, 11:29:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
I think this should be mentioned somewhere *much* more prominent. I
consider myself pretty tech-savy, but only stumbled upon this just now
on the this list. Can a non-free package be made essential
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 13:45 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
I think this should be mentioned somewhere *much* more prominent. I
consider myself pretty tech-savy, but only stumbled upon this just now
on the this list. Can a non-free
5 matches
Mail list logo
