Le mardi 23 octobre 2018 à 14:12 +, Mo Zhou a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 07:58:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 07:55:10PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > For BLAS/LAPACK implementations implemented in C, like OpenBLAS, they
> > > will be compiled
Le mardi 23 octobre 2018 à 14:17 +, Mo Zhou a écrit :
> Two in the audience are object to the "-ilp64" naming convention.
> Then how about this?
>
> src:openblas
> bin:libblas-base (...)
> bin:libblas-dev(...)
> bin:libblas64-base (filename=libblas64.so.3, SONAME=libblas64.so.3,
>
On 2018-10-23 22:17, Mo Zhou wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
Two in the audience are object to the "-ilp64" naming convention.
Then how about this?
src:openblas
bin:libblas-base (...)
bin:libblas-dev(...)
bin:libblas64-base (filename=libblas64.so.3, SONAME=libblas64.so.3,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:12:16PM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> (1) bin:libblas3 from src:lapack
> (2) bin:libatlas3-base from src:atlas
> (3) bin:libopenblas-base from src:openblas
> (4) bin:libblis1 from src:blis [WIP]
> (5) bin:libmkl-rt from src:intel-mkl [non-free]
> (6)
Hi Sebastien,
Two in the audience are object to the "-ilp64" naming convention.
Then how about this?
src:openblas
bin:libblas-base (...)
bin:libblas-dev(...)
bin:libblas64-base (filename=libblas64.so.3, SONAME=libblas64.so.3,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 07:58:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 07:55:10PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > For BLAS/LAPACK implementations implemented in C, like OpenBLAS, they
> > will be compiled using LP64, and not ILP64. Only integers exposed
> > through the
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:57:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Proposal:
> >
> > * The "-ilp64" postfix should be appended to the SONAME of all the new
> > shared objects that provide ILP64 interface. For example:
> >
> > libblas.so.3 (LP64) -> libblas-ilp64.so.3 (ILP64)
> >
> >
* Mo Zhou:
> Proposal:
>
> * The "-ilp64" postfix should be appended to the SONAME of all the new
> shared objects that provide ILP64 interface. For example:
>
> libblas.so.3 (LP64) -> libblas-ilp64.so.3 (ILP64)
>
> As a result, the same postfix should be added to the binary
On 2018-10-22 23:07, Mo Zhou wrote:
Are any
other packages likely to start wanting to use ILP64 ABIs? I guess it's
very much an 'HPC' sort of thing at the moment.
So yeah, some clarification in order I think, and an explanation of
use-cases.
HPC is indeed a related use case. I don't know
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 07:55:10PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> For BLAS/LAPACK implementations implemented in C, like OpenBLAS, they
> will be compiled using LP64, and not ILP64. Only integers exposed
> through the interface will be affected, through the use of appropriate
> types.
So you
Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 18:38 +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit :
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:17:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:07 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > > Here are some references:
> > >
> > > 1.
> > >
On 22 Oct 2018, at 18:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:07 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
>> Hi Wookey and Bastian,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 06:51:16PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>>> On 2018-10-21 17:16 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:51:15AM
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:17:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:07 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > Here are some references:
> >
> > 1.
> > https://software.intel.com/en-us/mkl-linux-developer-guide-using-the-ilp64-interface-vs-lp64-interface
> >
> >The Intel MKL ILP64
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 15:07 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi Wookey and Bastian,
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 06:51:16PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > On 2018-10-21 17:16 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:51:15AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > > > about naming convention
Hi Wookey and Bastian,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 06:51:16PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2018-10-21 17:16 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:51:15AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > > about naming convention of SONAME and package name.
> > >
> > > As discussed in
On 2018-10-21 17:16 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:51:15AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > about naming convention of SONAME and package name.
> >
> > As discussed in [1][2][3], Debian will need a set of ILP64[4] interface
> > to BLAS/LAPACK in the future.
>
> Could
Hi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:51:15AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> about naming convention of SONAME and package name.
>
> As discussed in [1][2][3], Debian will need a set of ILP64[4] interface
> to BLAS/LAPACK in the future.
Could you please describe what you mean? All 64-bit Debian
architectures
17 matches
Mail list logo
