Ian Jackson wrote:
|Steffen Nurpmeso writes ("Re: Rant about Debian reproducibility environment"\
|):
|> But despite that and the possibly correct observation that placing
|> just about any environmental info in any non-system-dependent
|> object you can close the issue t
Paride Legovini wrote:
|On 2018-03-01 18:17, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> But last week Paride committed "fixes"[1] after having been
|> prodded by some third party, and indeed, now S-nail is
|> reproducible on all Debian test boxes. The fix was to set the
|> built-in identification for the OS
On 2018-03-01 18:17, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> But last week Paride committed "fixes"[1] after having been
> prodded by some third party, and indeed, now S-nail is
> reproducible on all Debian test boxes. The fix was to set the
> built-in identification for the OS build environment to all
> "De
Steffen Nurpmeso writes ("Re: Rant about Debian reproducibility environment"):
> But despite that and the possibly correct observation that placing
> just about any environmental info in any non-system-dependent
> object you can close the issue that is my rant, but will not
Paul Wise wrote:
|On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> I try to make it short, but i want to say i am thankful for the
|> spark that reproducible-build.org was for me. Even though i think
|> it is a pity that $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is the sole indicator for
|> reproducible
Simon McVittie wrote:
|On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 at 19:49:13 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Simon McVittie wrote:
|>|Why is the kernel version on the machine where s-nail was compiled useful
|>|to you?
|>
|> This is indeed correct, and i have changed $OSENV to go for
|> uname(1) -sm instead
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> I try to make it short, but i want to say i am thankful for the
> spark that reproducible-build.org was for me. Even though i think
> it is a pity that $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is the sole indicator for
> reproducible environments, since now tha
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 at 19:49:13 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Simon McVittie wrote:
> |Why is the kernel version on the machine where s-nail was compiled useful
> |to you?
>
> This is indeed correct, and i have changed $OSENV to go for
> uname(1) -sm instead of -srm.
Continuing that thought
Hello Simon,
Simon McVittie wrote:
|On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 at 18:17:20 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> And, of course, if there is a different kernel version, or
|> a different uname(1) output as such, then how could a dumb end
|> producer[consumer, the author] like S-nail deal with that
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 at 18:17:20 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> And, of course, if there is a different kernel version, or
> a different uname(1) output as such, then how could a dumb end
> producer[consumer, the author] like S-nail deal with that? We
> hardwire those attributes into the
10 matches
Mail list logo
