[Theodore Tso]
The e2fsprogs-udeb package does include the mke2fs.conf file, so if
the installer is using the latest e2fsprogs-udeb, it should be
creating filesystems with the dir_index and resize_inode features.
Soon the etch installer is using the latest mkfs.ext3 to create the
file system.
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's
defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
[...] Perhaps people could comment on other things like this which
they've
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:02:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For dir_index you have to take the FS offline, tune2fs and fsck it or
you totaly corrupt it.
Actually, that's not true. It's perfectly safe to run tune2fs on a
mounted volume to
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:53:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Did they fix that? When I first looked into dir_index it was said that
it would corrupt the directories since it would search the old linear
dirs via hash and insert new entries by hash into linear dirs.
Who said that? I
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:53:14AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Did they fix that? When I first looked into dir_index it was said that
it would corrupt the directories since it would search the old linear
dirs via hash and insert new entries by
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:02:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For dir_index you have to take the FS offline, tune2fs and fsck it or
you totaly corrupt it.
Actually, that's not true. It's perfectly safe to run tune2fs on a
mounted volume to enable the dir_index feature. All directories
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I don't know about the installer, but all filesystems I created with
mke2fs recently also have resize_inode, which isn't even in the tune2fs
manpage.
It's not in the tune2fs man page because e2fsprogs doesn't currently
support adding
[Mike Hommey]
I don't know about the installer, but all filesystems I created with
mke2fs recently also have resize_inode, which isn't even in the
tune2fs manpage.
The default was recently changed in /etc/mke2fs.conf. It make life
with LVM a lot easier. :)
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
On Thursday 03 August 2006 06:24, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgrade
Anyobdy (Marco d'Itri?) can add some comments regarding
Hello!
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:05:10 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 06:24, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's
defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
I first thought of this when I noticed the change in the default
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's
defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
I first thought of this when I noticed the change in the default tuning for
ext2 partitions created by
12 matches
Mail list logo
