Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch

2022-08-07 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
Thanks, Thomas, for the patch, and Phil for the merge request. I'll take a look at them and will try to get them reviewed/applied upstream as well. Best wishes, Ryan -- |)|/ Ryan Kavanagh | 4E46 9519 ED67 7734 268F |\|\ https://rak.ac | BD95 8F7B F8FC 4A11 C97A

Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch

2022-08-06 Thread Philip Hands
Thomas DiModica writes: ... > You do say it needs a better description, so I'm going to try to > give you a sense of what's going on. I was really saying that whoever feels competent to decide to accept the Merge Request for the bc package ought to come up with a better description for why they

Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch

2022-08-06 Thread Thomas DiModica
Philip, thank you, I'm sorry: I have sent this to upstream, but haven't heard anything from them. At least with a mailing list, I get feedback as to whether or not my mail was eaten by the void of the Internet. Also, if it gets into Debian, then the patches filter through to everything based on

Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch

2022-08-06 Thread Philip Hands
Hi Thomas, Thomas DiModica writes: > Greetings, > > Yes, I keep spamming this trying to find an appropriate mailing list. I don't > remember how or why I initially stumbled across this bug report > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bc/+bug/1775776), but, given that > I have some

Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch

2022-08-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 05:12:13AM +, Thomas DiModica wrote: > Yes, I keep spamming this trying to find an appropriate mailing list. I don't > remember how or why I initially stumbled across this bug report > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bc/+bug/1775776), but, given that > I have