On Mon, 29 May 2006 10:27:45 +0200, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that
problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed
libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable?
No, that won't fix the problem for the
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that
problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed
libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it
works in unstable, of
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster:
Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that
problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed
libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it
works in unstable, of course.
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster:
Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that
problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed
libssl from etch, and upload that to
* Hendrik Sattler [Mon, 29 May 2006 20:58:19 +0200]:
PS: I bravely accept some flames for this suggestion...
Sure, here, have some:
- http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg01393.html
- http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg00752.html
-
5 matches
Mail list logo