Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 29 May 2006 10:27:45 +0200, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? No, that won't fix the problem for the

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it works in unstable, of

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable?  After checking that it works in unstable, of course.

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Hendrik Sattler [Mon, 29 May 2006 20:58:19 +0200]: PS: I bravely accept some flames for this suggestion... Sure, here, have some: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg01393.html - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg00752.html -