Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 18:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote: > > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources > > has the following versions of src:libreoffice. > > > > Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 > > Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 > > Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 > > > > But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. > > $ rmadison libreoffice --suite buster-backports > libreoffice | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source > libreoffice | 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source, armel > libreoffice | 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 | buster-backports | source, amd64, > arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > explains already one version: the armel one. A little bit of further digging suggests that someone[TM] should file an RM report for: libreoffice-gtk2 | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x uno-libs3| 6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x which appear to be cruft. Regards, Adam
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
Hi Christian, On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2020-10-02 09:34, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is >> mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. >> >> Same for 2.34-0.1. > > Could this perhaps be a Release-specific attribute that's not present in > every Source index? > > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources has > the following versions of src:libreoffice. > > Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 > Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 > Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 > > But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. $ rmadison libreoffice --suite buster-backports libreoffice | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source libreoffice | 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source, armel libreoffice | 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 | buster-backports | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x explains already one version: the armel one. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
On 2020-10-02 09:34, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is > mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. > > Same for 2.34-0.1. Could this perhaps be a Release-specific attribute that's not present in every Source index? I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources has the following versions of src:libreoffice. Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. [1] http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/buster-backports/main/source/Sources.xz
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
Stéphane, thanks for the fast reply! On 2020-10-02 09:34, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 02/10/2020 à 08:57, Christian Kastner a écrit : >> numerous versions of some of the packages. >> >> Those three versions happen to be the current versions from stable, >> testing, and unstable. Does anyone know why these are all in this one file? >> The version from unstable is the most surprising. > > > 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is > mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. I wasn't aware of this field, good to know. > Same for 2.34-0.1. > > 2.36-3 is the current version in testing. I compiled the list late last night and could have sworn that 2.36-3 is from unstable, but I guess my eyes were too tired already.
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
Le 02/10/2020 à 08:57, Christian Kastner a écrit : > I happened to stumble over the fact that bullseye Sources files contain > numerous versions of some of the packages. > > For example: > > $ wget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/source/Sources.gz > > $ zgrep -A 2 'Package: util-linux' Sources.gz | grep -v Binary > Package: util-linux > Version: 2.33.1-0.1 > -- > Package: util-linux > Version: 2.34-0.1 > -- > Package: util-linux > Version: 2.36-3 > > Those three versions happen to be the current versions from stable, > testing, and unstable. Does anyone know why these are all in this one file? > The version from unstable is the most surprising. 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. Same for 2.34-0.1. 2.36-3 is the current version in testing. Cheers, -- Stéphane
