On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:59:49PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a
user I miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency
solver. Using APT in DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create
some kind of problem, APT is
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:52:56PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
OK. Maybe i just supposed APT to do various things I'm used to expect
from other package managements. Now i undrstand, reading the point of
view of APT ?cotributor?, this piece of software is not for me.
Could you
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 07:42:31AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz [2009-02-09 21:12]:
This means my thoughts were correct, because Aptittude mantainers are
trying to implement it. (as I request) This answer I found satisfies
me.
They
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 20:56 +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz a
écrit :
This paper claims, that experimental branch of Aptitude include a
prototype of mentioned powerfull solver (same as zypper or smart).
(page 15):
http://people.debian.org/~dburrows/model.pdf
If you are talking about the
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 19:39 +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz a
écrit :
This Debian aproach is great for servers, but not usefull for
Desktops, where bleeding edge software and mixed repositories could be
expected.
Bullshit. On desktops as well as on servers, bleeding edge software will
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 23:11 +0100, Tilo Schwarz a écrit :
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfulldependency solver.
As a user I never had any problem using aptitude. It lets you cycle
quickly through its
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:37:29PM -0800, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
was heard to say:
I made early on was not to fetishize arbitrary optimality definitions,
because you can end up chasing phantoms that way. Optimal solutions
are not necessarily best. They are good for academic
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:27:03 +0100, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 23:11 +0100, Tilo Schwarz a écrit :
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfulldependency solver.
As a user I never
On 02/09/2009 05:59 AM, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT
in DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create some kind of problem,
APT is unable to solve.
Hello, please wrap your mails properly in future.
APT development list CC'ed.
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I miss
a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in
DEB-based distributions, I can
__
Od: jackyf.de...@gmail.com
Komu: kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz
CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team
Datum: 09.02.2009 14:20
Předmět: Re: incapable and obsolete APT / Aptitude replacement
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
# If you look at the comparison i posted above, you can se that APT is
worse than Urpmi and SMART - which was the best dependency solver in that
comparison. Zypper mentioned above, is a ittle bit better than #smart:
#
#If you look at users' feelings,
__
Od: jackyf.de...@gmail.com
Komu: kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz
CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, de...@lists.debian.org
Datum: 09.02.2009 18:15
Předmět: Re: incapable and obsolete APT / Aptitude replacement
kc.ubuntu
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
...
I don't feel comfortable to answer on your mails. Use '' for quoting, don't
include mail
headers into answers, and wrap the text, really. Why I have to spend my time to
parse your
mails while you don't have a time even to configure your mail client?
Or wait
Sorry.
I'm not familiar with mailing list, and it take me a lot of time event to find
out, how to response. Apologise myself. I did not know. I'm not used to.
have a nice day.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
__
Od: jackyf.de...@gmail.com Komu: kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz CC:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org, de...@lists.debian.org Datum:
09.02.2009 18:15 Předmět: Re: incapable and obsolete APT / Aptitude
I don't know, If you know the correct answer, but I was right. I found some
paper with additional explanation of the dependency solver problem in Debian.
This paper claims, that experimental branch of Aptitude include a prototype of
mentioned powerfull solver (same as zypper or smart). (page
I demand that Eugene V. Lyubimkin may or may not have written...
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
...
[note: reformatted]
I don't feel comfortable to answer on your mails. Use '' for quoting,
don't include mail headers into answers, and wrap the text, really. Why I
have to spend my time to
Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Eugene V. Lyubimkin may or may not have written...
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
...
[note: reformatted]
I don't feel comfortable to answer on your mails. Use '' for quoting,
don't include mail headers into answers, and wrap the text, really. Why I
have
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:59:49 +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfulldependency solver.
As a user I never had any problem using aptitude. It lets you cycle
quickly through its
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:31 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in
DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create some
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:59:49PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz was heard to
say:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I miss
a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in
DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create some kind of
* kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz [2009-02-09 21:12]:
This means my thoughts were correct, because Aptittude mantainers are
trying to implement it. (as I request) This answer I found satisfies
me.
They don't implement it on your request.
yours
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
23 matches
Mail list logo
