Release Notes: Unknown reference "newreleasename"

Hi Noticed that was added in the upgrading section of the release notes (looks to be introduced via #1035089) and I can parse that (or can I?) but make validate does not pass clean with it. brother@janmayen:~/git/other/debian/release-notes (master *)$ LC_ALL=C make validate LINGUA=sv

Re: Any discussion of replacing MoinMoin?

On 2023-06-05 10:53, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 05:45 +0000, Martin wrote: >> To me, the most desperately missing feature is having wiki content in a >> VCS, such as git. I like to work on documentation like on code. > > This is a different kind of wiki to what

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:20 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 05-06-2023 04:38, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >>> On a related issue, something in dpkg or apt should check the CPU > >>> features and refuse to perform an upgrade/dist-upgrade on an host > >>>

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

Hey Paul, On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 10:36 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 04-06-2023 21:28, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > As previously stated, the Geode LX (but not older Geodes) does fulfill > > the baseline requirement for i686. NOPL, PAE and others were marked by > > Intel

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

86-pae kernel, the release notes should explicitly say so. On a related issue, something in dpkg or apt should check the CPU features and refuse to perform an upgrade/dist-upgrade on an host whose CPU doesn't meet the new baseline requirements. Martin-Éric

Re: Any discussion of replacing MoinMoin?

On 2023-06-03 22:07, Franklin Yu wrote: > Has anyone considered switching to any alternative? The Debian Wiki UI does > not > attract users to contribute (no Wiki syntax highlight in the editor, for > example). To me, the most desperately missing feature is having wiki content in a VCS, such as

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 7:15 PM Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 6:36 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > > On 11-05-2023 20:20, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Please review my proposal here: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

bumped. Please note that I never received the previous message you quoted. Anyhow, I commented. on Salsa. Martin-Éric

Bug#1036876: Consider documenting that booting from partial volume groups is no longer supported.

in the initramfs and that bookworm will no longer support this. Please consider adding this change to the release notes, if appropriate. - Martin

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 9:02 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > On 16-03-2023 20:20, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > The release notes for i386 should specify the minimum CPU requirements. > > Thanks for letting us know. If we raise the baseline, historically we > mention it in th

Bug#1033065: release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum CPU requirements

build-essentials' GCC defaults and instead configure flags to match the CPU features of the build host, which produces binaries that segfault on a Geode. Martin-Éric -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEyJACx3qL7GpObXOQrh+Cd8S017YFAmQTa+AACgkQrh+Cd8S0

release-notes, issues - using without role=...

While translating the issues file I noticed that three occurences of fail2ban uses as tag instead of the more common role="package">. Looks like only these three lines in the entire repo does it like this. Might be an oversight. > Users of fail2ban in combination with > bsd-mailx who wish >

Bug#991878: [armel] no longer supported devices

* Holger Wansing [2021-08-04 21:36]: > A patch based on this is attached (it makes the section only appear in > the armel release-notes - currently the paragraph is visible in all archs - > and changes the model numbers to "TS-xxx"). Looks good to me. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#991878: [armel] no longer supported devices

Debian). But since this is in the armel release notes, I think your wording is fine. Support for all QNAP Turbo Station devices based on Marvell chips was dropped, but that might just make it more confusing. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/

Aw: how to fix typo in Debian doc Korean ?

> I found a typo at https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/index.ko.html#contents > How to fix it?   HTH   https://sources.debian.org/src/debian-history/2.23/po4a/po/ko.po/   If you can grep the wrong string there: bug report with patch.  

Improving our manpages using the tldr project?

Hello, (please keep me in CC, I'm not on the list) I'm currently teaching the shell to undergrads, and I am facing some hard questions such as the source of documentation to consider. The manpages are a great source for reference documentation, but sometimes they are very difficult to use on a

Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

ge not found”. > > > For the moment, there is no draft for buster release notes. So this is > deliberate. Since the freeze has started, are there plans to get the release notes for buster published (even if only a draft)? -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/

Re: debian-history package preparation in progress

Quoting Osamu Aoki : These also need to be moved to DocBook XML and drop using debiandoc-sgml. project-history itself also need to upload a new package with the salsa repository URL. So far, I have completed to migrate debian-history to XML+po4a for all languages. (Yes, Korean and Spanish

Re: First git repos uploaded

On 2018-05-17 12:19, Marcos Fouces wrote: > I hopefully filled all attic's repos. Great, many thanks!

Re: First git repos uploaded

On 2018-05-15 12:29, Marcos Fouces wrote: > Thanks for creating this group. As you say, i cannot create repos > myself. This is the "attic-inventory". Done. I hope, I did not miss anything. Cheers

Re: First git repos uploaded

On 2018-05-14 18:38, Marcos Fouces wrote: > What i need is an attic directory to upload repos here. OK, I removed the empty attic project and created a group. I assume, that you cannot create git repos in there. Please try anyway, and if it does not work, just send me the complete list of names

Bug#898560: refcard: doesn't use dblatex anymore to build pdf

Control: tag -1 pending It was a missing export in debian/rules. On 2018-05-13 15:41, Holger Wansing wrote: > There are two or three languages left, which are not confirmed to work > correctly with dblatex. > If I remember correctly, this because there are no active translators > for those

Bug#898560: refcard: doesn't use dblatex anymore to build pdf

On 2018-05-13 14:53, Holger Wansing wrote: > I'm a bit helpless here I'll check this later. Btw. can we disable xmlroff altogether? Is dblatex good enough for all languages now?

Re: First git repos uploaded

On 2018-05-13 00:16, Marcos Fouces wrote: > Now, I just need an attic with 33 repositories for the obsolete documents. https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/attic

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 20:45, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > If I go to General -> Advanced I just see "Housekeeping" and "Rename > repository" options. No option to transfer the project apparently. This can be done only be users with "owner" rights, it seems. > Maybe an alternative to that is to

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 22:13, Marcos Fouces wrote: > I already created 33 repos with obsolete documents destined to attic and Great, thanks! > six more for the following ones: > > * harden-doc > * release-notes > * project-history > * debian-faq > * java-faq > * hamradio-handbook > > I believe that some

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 16:02, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > It feels like we are not organising ourselves sufficiently. Is there any > way we can move the DDP (project) into the ddp-team (group)? > I only see an option to create a new project and I rather not duplicate the > work I did yesterday if it

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 12:16, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > If putting our repos under a "ddp" group means write-access to our repos is > shared, then I'm in favour of that: it'd save administrative overhead in the > long run. That's my understanding: We can give write access to non-DDs/non-DMs, as long as

Re: DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-12 09:51, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Ideally refcard, faq, release-notes, project-history etc. would all be > standalone git repositories (after possibly being converted from svn to git) > at > salsa. D'accord. Question: - shall we have a "ddp" group on salsa.d.o with those repos,

Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

On 2018-05-12 07:58, W. Martin Borgert wrote: (actually nothing) Uh, this happens, if I click on a mailto URL in Firefox and select mutt as MUA. Need to switch to w3m or lynx.

Don't we need a group on Salsa?

Hi, Javier has created a DDP project in Salsa (thanks!), but in GitLab a project seems to be equal to a git repository. We have several manuals etc., so we need several git repos, therefore a DDP group, or am I mistaken? Cheers

Re: Move of DDP SVN repository to Salsa?

DDP group on salsa.d.o? (was: Move refcard to salsa?)

On 2018-05-11 10:54, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Correction: There is even a ddp group, so I'll put it there: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ddp/refcard Oops: ddp is not a group, but an empty repository. Why is that so? What is it good for? Shouldn't there be a DDP group with refcard and

Re: Move refcard to salsa?

Quoting Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org>: "W. Martin Borgert" <deba...@debian.org> wrote: if nobody objects, I would move the refcard git repo from collab-maint to the Debian group at salsa these days. Correction: There is even a ddp group, so I'll put it there: ht

Proof reading and related updates to Release notes?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Did the Swedish translation of the Release notes over the last few days. One of the great things with this is that I also read most of the English strings during this process and I found a bunch of oddities that I think need to be adjusted. I am not

Re: manpages.debian.org has been modernized!

On 2017-01-18 18:23, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > https://manpages.debian.org has been modernized! Congrats and thanks! I like it!

Bug#851229: net-tools no longer priority important, iproute2 is

with iproute2. Reference: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/12/msg00604.html -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Re: How to edit debiandoc in emacs with nxml

Quoting Bob Bernstein : Now I would like to return to my first love, debiandoc, and do likewise. Has anyone hints on how to achieve this? I don't seem to be able to get the schema set correctly, if that's even possible with debiandoc, which I know is SGML. Please

Bug#834677: refcard: FTBFS in testing (xelatex compilation failed)

On 2016-09-01 21:10, Holger Wansing wrote: > Martin: I fear, there is another upload needed :-( No problem! Anyway, I added you to Uploaders :~)

Re: refcard is marked for autoremoval from testing

Quoting Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>: Hi Martin, ... could you take the time to upload the latest refcard to unstable, please? OK, will do.

Bug#809611: d-i fails to boot on HP mv2120

Please add the following to the release-notes on armel in the upgrade section: HP mv2120 The default u-boot settings from HP no longer work with Debian 9. Before you can upgrade to Debian 9, you have to change some settings in the u-boot configuration. The required changes are documented on the

Re: debian-refcard: package upload?

On 2016-08-02 21:09, Holger Wansing wrote: > And additionally, I have no active translators for ar and ml. So I have > no proofreader, which why I don't want to perform much aggressive changings > on that languages ATM. Maybe we need another "call for translators", esp. for ar and he. And, yes,

Re: debian-refcard: package upload?

On 2016-08-02 00:40, Holger Wansing wrote: > thanks for the upload! > > I have checked all the files, and all looks fine to me. Thanks for checking! Everything is now in https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/refcard.git Whenever you need a new version, just drop me a line. Cheers

Git for -doc? (was: debian-refcard: package upload?)

On 2016-07-10 12:36, Holger Wansing wrote: > Am Sa. Juli 9 12:57:34 2016 GMT+0200 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: > > I would do, but probably not before the 20th of this month. > > That would be perfectly fine for me. Sorry, I slacked 10 days already. One question to Holger and the -d

Re: debian-refcard: package upload?

On 2016-07-09 11:13, Holger Wansing wrote: > Is there something else needed for an upload? > Would someone please take care of this? I would do, but probably not before the 20th of this month.

Re: debian-refcard

Quoting Holger Wansing : In Jessie, apt-get and apt-cache are valid commands, as well as the '/etc/init.d/file restart' constructs. Are there changings ongoing, making that all invalid? If yes, what are the new variants of that commands? The new apt commands are (IMHO)

Re: debian-refcard

On 2016-03-22 14:39, Holger Wansing wrote: > (change keyboard config, remove Apache stuff) Yes, just do it! I would also like to see "apt" instead of "apt-get" and "apt-cache" and systemd instead of sysvinit commands. And the version numbering of the refcard should reflect the Debian release.

Re: debian-refcard

Quoting Holger Wansing : Would you mind uploading debian-refcard, to get this updated in Stretch? As the original author of the debian refcard I violently welcome any attempt to get it back to a useful state! :~) Cheers

Re: Bug#796895: www.debian.org: Release notes of Debian 8.1 seem to be in some other language alongwith English

df readers as well but the answer was > same. Seems Russian by the looks of it. I can confirm this issue. It happens with all PDFs (regardless of the architecture). Javier, Holger, any idea? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#810283: jessie: note that armel/iop32x subarch was removed

, +including ixp4xx, kirkwood, orion and versatile. + + Finally, the Debian ports to the FreeBSD kernel, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386, included as technology previews in Debian 6.0 and Debian 7, are -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Re: Testing release still called jessie in project history docs

en.html#s4.11 Thanks, I made that change in SVN. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Re: Debian GNU/Linux refcard partially obsolete

On 2015-11-01 00:11, Raphaël Bazaud wrote: > the way to start/stop > daemons is referencing the scripts in /etc/init.d whereas Debian has > «switched to» systemd so the new way of doing things is rather something > like systemctl cmd service with cmd ∈ {start, stop, status, kill, … }. > or

Correction dans le site Web en français

This message is a french translator in charge of the website. Please forward this mail, if you do not speak french. Thanks. Bonjour, Je vous contacte pour signaler une que la page suivante contient -- William MARTIN <http://www.power-lan.com/> 15 rue de la Noé des Yonnières 44850 Sain

Re: Corrections to Debian Documentations?

On 2015-05-20 02:10, Joseph Haverford wrote: Hey, I want to contribute to Debian Good! but I can't code. No problem, there are many ways to help. I *can* spot tiny issues in syntax/spelling in files. This is very helpful. Most of us aren't native English speakers, so we really need more

Bug#772963: release-notes: cellphone friendly CSS

On 2015-02-25 02:22, Stéphane Blondon wrote: The modified version is viewable as previously: http://stephane.yaal.fr/tmp/release-notes.amd64.html.icons/index.en.html I tried on my smartphone and it's better to browse. Can someone else check on his own phone? I did try with Iceweasels

release-notes rebuild needed every 4h?

, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.orgDebian System Administrator Debian GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B

Re: release-notes rebuild needed every 4h?

On 2015-02-04 20:45, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Can we change that rebuild to once or twice a week, please? Changes to the release-notes are not that often. Just curious: Is the rebuild done, when there are no changes? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#772963: release-notes: cellphone friendly CSS

On 2015-01-21 01:23, Stéphane Blondon wrote: Demos are temporary available : ... http://stephane.yaal.fr/tmp/installer_docs/Chapter%C2%A02.%C2%A0What%27s%20new%20in%20Debian%208.html Nice! Two (minor) remarks: 1. The footer does not fit on my telephone in portrait format. The house icon is

Re: Migrate Release Notes to git? [was: Re: Jessie Release Progress and a stricter freeze policy]

On 2014-11-25 23:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote: Would it perhaps make sense to move the Release Notes in git or is it too late for Jessie? From my past experience with release notes, build tools, etc., I suggest to do this step right after Jessie release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Things to check in release notes

in upgrading.po I found All OpenERP 5 packages have been removed and are obsolete. This includes systemitem role=\package\openerp-client/systemitem, systemitem role=\package\openerp-server/systemitem, systemitem role=\package\openerp-web/systemitem. Add a and instead of the last comma as

Release notes comments: whats-new.po

in whats-new.po I saw that LXDE is noted as having a version number (0.5.0). This seems odd when LXDE is made out of individual components with different version numbers. I should know this as I am the upstream release manager =) My proposal would be to remove the version number from the

Bug#683628: OpenERP and Pootle are also removed from testing

Not sure, whether it's already documented. Feel free to file a separate bug report. listitem para All OpenERP 5 packages have been removed and are obsolete. This includes systemitem role=packageopenerp-client/systemitem, systemitem

Re: Indonesian translation of Debian GNU/Linux Reference Card

Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org: Uploaded. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120710193804.82031c83ijlv3...@webmail.in-berlin.de

Re: Indonesian translation of Debian GNU/Linux Reference Card

Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org: Nothing serious but details can be improved. Is martin busy now? Not very busy, but please feel everybody in DDP free to do improvements and uploads! That's why we have team maintenance :~) (Btw. the current dblatex in testing is a huge improvement over

Bug#606421: More rendering issues with the refcard

Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org: XMLROFF may not stop build but that does not mean they build usable page for CJK (i.e., zh). That was the reason I am using DBLATEX (DocBook XML to Latex using XeTeX backend) for DDP projects. In fact, the Makefile for the refcard choses between dblatex

Re: Basic documentation style for better reading

On 2012-03-11 02:12, Kostya Rybnikov wrote: I'm trying to get started and read HTML docs and what I can say that it is hard to read in it's current view. So I suggest to improve reading process by adding small change on HTML generation: add style=max-width: 800px; margin: 0pt auto; inside body

Re: Basic documentation style for better reading

On 2012-03-11 09:36, W. Martin Borgert wrote: Maybe 66em is more or less appropriate for text? Self-correction: 66 characters does, of course, not equal 66em. For most text it's about 30 or 35 em. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: Bug#647062: debian-refcard: Debian Reference Card URL down

We should move this talk do the debian-doc mailing list, as it is not related to #647062 anymore, right? Quoting David Prévot taf...@debian.org: I just grabbed the old content from http://web.archive.org and agree that it would be a nice addition (even better if it could be translated, as the

Bug#647062: debian-refcard: Debian Reference Card URL down

Quoting David Prévot taf...@debian.org: As already stated by some users[1,2], the Debian Reference Card URL[3] is down. Do you intend to restore it, or should the Reference Card be updated to point to the Debian URL[4]? The latter. Please, feel free to change the URL in the refcard, I will put

Re: possible solution for: dblatex - builds probably invalid Greek document

On 2011-10-04 20:58, Andreas Hoenen wrote: Does the parameter file respectively the patch work for you? Yes, it works perfectly, many thanks! Please close #492366. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Release notes: upgrading.po misspelled

Doing the Swedish update of the release notes and just found the following error in upgrading.po. ...to log the result of the actiosn described... quick fix. -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu Bruce Schneier's tears can burn holes through an OpenBSD firewall. Lucky for us, Bruce Schneier

Debian FAQ (was: update of DDP related web pages)

Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org: Debian FAQ is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml. Between 2008-05-19 and 2008-10-03, I created a docbookified, po4aified, and utf8ifed branch of the FAQ: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddp/manuals/branches/debian-faq/dbk-po4a-utf8/ At that time it has been

Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)

for that? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64

Bug#612166: What's new for ARM section out of date

=packageixp4xx-microcode/systemitem in non-free. -Installer images for Debian which include this microcode will -continue to be made available from ulink -url=http://slug-firmware.net;slug-firmware.net/ulink. - /para /section section id=newfors390 arch=s390 -- Martin Michlmayr http

Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)

looked into them, they seem to be build with docbook. Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http

Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)

Hi, On Sun Feb 06, 2011 at 22:40:32 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that? Most of the documentation nowadays is built using Docbook although some

\n or not to \n in Release Notes

Hi Have you decided on using \n in upgrading or not? We had to remove them some days ago but they popped up again now. Just checking. 37 fuzzy lines for almost just adding a leading \n. (I had some spelling errors to take care of too =)) -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu Bruce Schneier

Re: \n or not to \n in Release Notes

not changed recently. Maybe this is related to the use of po4a? I've found that sometimes some content (the examples' text with commands) shows up when updating the po with or without \n and the translation (which, in any case, does not add anything) changes from ok to fuzzy. Martin, maybe

Re: How do convert release notes sources from .dbk to .po format?

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Marcelo Santana wrote: Please, does anyone can say me what is the correct way to convert release notes sources from .dbk to .po format? I'm trying to update Brazilian Portuguese translation of Squeeze release notes and I'm using po4a 0.34-2 (as recommended on Makefile)

Bug#609483: release notes: maybe a dblatex parameter issue

Hi, the release notes Makefile uses --param=latex.encoding=utf8 which looks right, but seems to be responsible for this problem. Removing the option, unfortunately, leads to build failure at hyphenation.tex, breaking at words with umlauts. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#568126: lm-sensors: Resource conflicts policy in kernel has changed

be workarounded by setting this parameter to lax, e.g. by appending acpi_enforce_resources=lax to the kernel boot line. -%- I (native German) suggest A workaround is appending acpi_enforce_resources=lax to the kernel boot line. as last sentence. Cheers Martin

Re: Release Notes ready to *start* updating translations?

On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: Also it would be good to know if the .po files are being kept up to date automatically or we have to run some script/make invocation first. They are not up to date. So every session you have to do the following. 1. go to the subversion check out. 2.

Bug#609190: release-notes: some more small problems

In upgrading.dbk: 2. para - The following sections describes known issues that might appear + The following sections describe known issues that might appear Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

release-notes: whats-new.po, dependency booting - same information twice

in the paragraphs about dependency based boot the fact that the feature is on by default is specified twice. An important improvement in the debian; boot system is the introduction of dependency-based boot sequencing and parallel boot. This feature is enabled by default in new installs and it

Bug#608945: release-notes: installing.po - platforms misspelled

package: release-notes severity: wishlist when translating the release notes I found the following string: The installation system now supports the following plataforms: where the last word should be platforms -- /brother http://martin.bagge.nu Värt att notera här är att när Svartholm Warg får

question regarding release-notes:old-stuff.po

I found this message when doing translation updates for Swedish and need a hand in deciphering it. To configure your system's locale you can run commanddpkg-reconfigure locales/command. Ensure you select an UTF-8 locale when you are presented with the question asking which locale to use as a

Bug#608172: releases/testing/ should mention where to find the source of the release notes

to find the source of the release notes might be a good idea. Also the documentation how the process of writing release notes works (which gid is needed, how texts should be proposed) should either be linked from here or stated here. Cheers, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0

Re: Request for updated info on d-i for the Release Notes

* Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com [2010-10-15 15:02]: alpha got dropped as a release architecture for arm. For squeeze. :) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote: I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to * successfully * build the package. Interesting: Refcard builds

Bug#584350: refcard: FTBFS: xmlroff segfaults on japanese PDF

On 2010-09-19 20:58, Simon Paillard wrote: Could you please send the list of the packages you have in your sid system ? It hope it will help I built using a clean chroot with only the build deps. Did ja not compile or does it just look bad? Given the current amount of fuzzy strings (I will

Re: www-master move, final steps: /doc/manuals/sgml-howto

Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org: More problematic is: http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy Here, at least the following two points: # We'll use SGML as source format. Note that this does not mean that users have to learn SGML to submit changes to our documents. We accept all

Re: www-master move, final steps: /doc/manuals/sgml-howto

Quoting Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org: Any reason to add sgml-howto to ddp Makefile or it is so old that the doc is no longer valid ? If I look at the correct document, it seems partly outdated to me. Are we talking about this? http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/ To me, too

Bug#595494: mdadm: metadata version change and grub2 support

') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http

Bug#595494: mdadm: metadata version change and grub2 support

that I forgot that. ;) Now I wonder if I can add it with the old version number and still have it show up properly. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck

Re: group add request

On 2010-03-20 00:22, Bdale Garbee wrote: Would someone with suitable privs please add me to the ddp group ASAP so that I can commit changes to project-history? Done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#522341: refcard: FTBFS: failure to process entity papersize

retitle 522341 docbook-xsl: failure to process entity papersize severity 522341 normal tags 522341 moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hi Marco, many thanks for your bugreport. According to your problem description the error is in docbook-xsl, not in refcard. refcard uses docbook-xsl to build.

Bug#522341: refcard: FTBFS: failure to process entity papersize

reassign 522341 docbook-xsl thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100221130834.ga27...@beron.tangosoft.com

Bug#551229: dblatex: error when building Czech or Slovak pdf

reopen 551229 reassign 551229 dblatex 0.2.12-3 severity 551229 normal retitle 551229 dblatex: error when building Czech or Slovak pdf thanks During an archive rebuild an error in dblatex has been detected. I will attach example files and the error message of dblatex to this bug report. -- To

Re: Bug#562325: maint-guide: FTBFS: debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: maint-guide.fr.dvi could not be generated properly

Quoting Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org: If no one comes up to help, I will simply drop these problematic build and just do html and plain text. While doing it, I will change source to UTF-8 for more practical gain. How about moving the guide from debiandoc-sgml to e.g. DocBook XML? -- To

Re: Debian Reference Card not available

Quoting Simon Paillard simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr: So question for debacle: do you remember how refcard was published on the website ? Was it ever published on a Debian website? Maybe, but I always have it on a private site: www.tangosoft.com/refcard/ Do you prefer to see it

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >