Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2023 17:46:36 +0200 with message-id <2a95875e-e0ae-7580-ccca-87a3dbef7...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1030040: release-notes: usrmerge and dist-upgrade has caused the Debian Bug report #992116, regarding release-notes: Add breakage from merged-/usr-via-aliased-dirs to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 992116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992116 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release-notes Severity: important Hi, While this breakage is apparently not going to be reverted, the users deserve to know what they are getting into, to avoid hard to track bugs and misbehavior. To me this would be worth mentioning on its own in addition to the note I added to the "deprecation" entry, but repetition is not ideal and I can see push back on that too, so I'd rather have it listed just once than not at all. Thanks, GuillemFrom 134021b9dff9ad4e52a7446ce57dbfc0339b4754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:24:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] issues.dbk: Add breakage from merged-/usr-via-aliased-dirs While this breakage is apparently not going to be reverted, the users deserve to know what they are getting into, to avoid hard to track bugs and misbehavior. In particular dpkg has *never* supported this layout. --- en/issues.dbk | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk index d3321953..bbd772ad 100644 --- a/en/issues.dbk +++ b/en/issues.dbk @@ -893,6 +893,25 @@ Environment=SYSTEMD_SULOGIN_FORCE=1 role="package">usrmerge</systemitem> package exists to do the conversion if desired. </para> + <para> + Take into account that this layout has never been supported by + the dpkg suite and breaks several of its core assumptions. Included + among these are: not being able to notice file conflicts thus + causing silent overwrites, disappearing pathnames on upgrades, + failing to apply stat-overrides, missed trigger activations, failing + to find pathnames on search queries, etc. + For more information see the <ulink + url="https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#unsupported-merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs"> + dpkg FAQ entry</ulink>. + </para> + <para> + It can also cause problems with any other software or subsystem + that tracks filesystem objects, and might be doing string-wise + comparisons. An example of such interfaces is + <filename>/etc/shells</filename>, where the entries need to be + duplicated or programs using that file directly or indirectly + might fail to match them. + </para> </listitem> <listitem> -- 2.32.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, On 01-05-2023 15:53, Richard Lewis wrote:(In case of duplication, just wanted to ensure the BTS had a link to this MR (which covers this and the other bug about usrmerge): https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/155And that request was just merged. PaulOpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---