On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:05:24PM +, James Addison wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:31:37 +0800, pabs wrote:
> > Perhaps lintian could add classification tags for the relevant CPU
> > instructions and then the i386 port could have extra autopkgtest nodes
> > that only process the packages
Package: release-notes
Followup-For: Bug #1033065
X-Debbugs-Cc: elb...@debian.org
Control: severity -1 serious
Increasing this bug's severity to a release-critical, based on mailing list
discussion[1].
Paul: bug #1005863 has most of the relevant context for Debian, although I'd
recommend the
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1033065 [release-notes] release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum
CPU requirements
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1033065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1033065 normal
Bug #1033065 [release-notes] release-notes: i386 notes should specify minimum
CPU requirements
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 12:05 +, James Addison wrote:
> That's not a bad idea. Are there any reasons that that might _not_ be a good
> idea before filing a wishlist bug? (performance, implications of scanning
> binary packages, ...)
binutils isn't security supported, so using objdump in
Package: release-notes
Followup-For: Bug #1033065
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@debian.org, ballo...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer and Éric-Martin (with Bill on carbon copy),
Please find linked below a previous release note from Debian 9.0 (stretch)
that we could use to provide relevant user guidance:
6 matches
Mail list logo
