Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
at bottom :- On 06/09/2018, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:20:05PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: >> I also realized I forgot to upload the package. >> (I hope my upload will be accepted) > > As I tried to add French and Italian translation to FAQ, this is what I > found. > > 1. Italian translation has too much old info. It's best not to make PO > with unmatched string risks. So drop it as japa-policy package did. > > 2. French translation PO for XML was generated locally. But I realized > including both FAQ and POLICY in one package makes these translation > system to be mixed up and non-optimal. It is cleaner to take out JAVA > FAQ as a separate source package. But that has some negatives. I can > work around this problem with the current source. ... Any thought ... > > Osamu > Dear Osamu, It might be a good idea to CC the il8n team and also ping the last translator in the hopes we get current translations so those could be shared. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:20:05PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > I also realized I forgot to upload the package. > (I hope my upload will be accepted) As I tried to add French and Italian translation to FAQ, this is what I found. 1. Italian translation has too much old info. It's best not to make PO with unmatched string risks. So drop it as japa-policy package did. 2. French translation PO for XML was generated locally. But I realized including both FAQ and POLICY in one package makes these translation system to be mixed up and non-optimal. It is cleaner to take out JAVA FAQ as a separate source package. But that has some negatives. I can work around this problem with the current source. ... Any thought ... Osamu
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 04:31:15PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 06/09/2018 à 15:44, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > > Please note that most DDP documents are published by using the released > > unstable package. We already have cron script in place for Java FAQ and > > Java Policy. > > Interesting, so this means the Java Policy updates were published to the > web site with uploads of the java-common package in unstable? Do you No java-policy package. > know if the process was updated to get the policy from the java-policy > package instead of java-common? Now that I uploaded java-policy, let's see if that is accepted and let's see CRON will pick up in 4-6 hours Osamu
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:08, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I observe though that Sylvestre Ledru edited the FAQ in 2013, and I'm > not sure the changes were propagated to the DDP repository. If the > contents diverged it would be nice to reconcile them first before doing > more changes. > Thanks for spotting, I will take a look at it this week and try to reconcile these changes. Best regards Javier
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
Le 05/09/2018 à 09:53, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino a écrit : > As mentioned previously in the thread related to this document the > authoritative location is this one: > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/java-faq > > That is where all the document history is (migrated from the former DDP > SVN). > > Java-policy contains a *copy* of the document and does not have the > commit history. Ok, I now see in the java-policy commit history that the FAQ was periodically synchronized with the DDP repository. Thank you for the clarification. I observe though that Sylvestre Ledru edited the FAQ in 2013, and I'm not sure the changes were propagated to the DDP repository. If the contents diverged it would be nice to reconcile them first before doing more changes. Emmanuel Bourg
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
Hi, El mié., 5 sept. 2018 1:22, Emmanuel Bourg escribió: > Le 04/09/2018 à 12:57, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > > This is merged to master with fix to your changes and updated build > > script. I think you should close merge request ... I don't know how. > > The FAQ in the java-policy repository hasn't been updated though. I'm a > bit confused, do we have two versions of the Java FAQ in different > repositories? Which one was more recent before shirish changes? > As mentioned previously in the thread related to this document the authoritative location is this one: https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/java-faq That is where all the document history is (migrated from the former DDP SVN). Java-policy contains a *copy* of the document and does not have the commit history. Best regards Javier >
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
Le 04/09/2018 à 12:57, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > This is merged to master with fix to your changes and updated build > script. I think you should close merge request ... I don't know how. The FAQ in the java-policy repository hasn't been updated though. I'm a bit confused, do we have two versions of the Java FAQ in different repositories? Which one was more recent before shirish changes? Emmanuel Bourg
Re: Could somebody look at the discussion at merge 5
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 05:07:12AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear all, > > Can somebody who knows the Debian-java integration and otherwise > please take a look at the discussion at > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/5 and > comment both on the code and the reaction happening therein. As I posted there, you missed reading my post to this list. This is merged to master with fix to your changes and updated build script. I think you should close merge request ... I don't know how. Regards, Osamu
