The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 7097f538080436f7c6b4743b2dd6d73021ddb503
Author: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jan 26 23:15:14 2008 +0100
Dpkg::Checksums: New module for checksum handling in .dsc and .changes files
diff --git
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit ce38fa696de36b1978153e5ec53535a287be3bac
Author: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jan 26 23:16:29 2008 +0100
Use new Dpkg::Checksums module
* scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl, scripts/dpkg-source.pl: Use new
Hi Ciol!
[ This question is IMHO better suited for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2008, 12:18 +0100 schrieb ciol:
Hi, do you know it it exists something that allows to create .deb
packages from ebuilds (or others files that looks like ebuilds)?
It's been some time since I last
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's a mistake to separate those -- our source package format is
a VCS system; if wigpen happens to be a more suitable VCS, that's fine,
but it's not inherently superior or inferior to any other VCS, just
because it happens to be
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A VCS is a system for controlling (managing, distributing) versions of a
repository.
A Debian source package is a repository.
It's a changeset or a set of changesets. This is not a repository any
more than a collection of objects is a balanced
Russ Allbery wrote:
(it's not yet clear to me that Git can usefully represent changesets
via feature branches, but that's another argument that is already
ongoing elsewhere).
People are arguing about that because bikeshedding and random discussion
of lattices, is, apparently, fun.
apt-cache
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:03:18PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
The whole thing honestly doesn't do much for security anyway until
the gpg
support of dpkg-source is largely improved. For that I have no real
concept
yet, though.
Well, apt verifies them when it
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
For me this sentence is the essence of your mail: That you dislike
Joey's idea since it includes the VCS in the source package itself and
would prefer that we worked on creating a solution on top of wigpen
instead.
Do I understand that
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
However, stashing away uncommitted changes and not including them in the
build violates least suprise. I'd except to see them either commited
automatically, or the current error forcing me to resolve them before
building. The advantage to
Did you received this email?
ciol wrote:
Hi, do you know it it exists something that allows to create .deb
packages from ebuilds (or others files that looks like ebuilds)?
Can dpkg manages other package formats than .deb?
Thx.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
This e-mail has been sent due to an upload to Ubuntu that contains Ubuntu
changes. It contains the difference between the new version and the
previous version of the same source package in Ubuntu.Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:41:04 +0100
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev
symantec norton antivirus 10.1 for mac - 29
sonic scenarist 3.0 - 49
corel painter ix for mac - 39
softimage alienbrain 8 - 169
borland developer studio 2006 - 149
microsoft visio 2007 professional - 39
steinberg nuendo 3.1 - 99
parallels desktop 3.0 for mac - 29
cakewalk sonar 6 producer edition
I haven't checked, but this sounds very similar to #20471. There's a patch
in that bug. If you can take some time to verify if it also fixes this
issue, it would be nice.
I applied this patch on top of current git master
(rev 98cdd8883f0661e24ff72d4c29d73554586eddf8), and have been using it
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:39:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
Package: dpkg-dev
Severity: wishlist
Please find attached a patch which implements setting a set of
compiler flags for a build; this was first announced in
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.16.6
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Fix wrong call to open in Dpkg/Control.pm
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
libzlui-gtk depends on libzlcore (= 0.8.12-3). I have both installed. If
I tell dpkg to upgrade to a new 0.8.13 version of libzlcore, it does so,
leaving libzlui-gtk with a broken dependency. At no point does dpkg
complain about that dependency being
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 465184 -1
Bug#465184: libdebian-package-make-perl: Dpkg modules are not yet a public API
Bug 465184 cloned as bug 465256.
tag 465184 pending
Bug#465184: libdebian-package-make-perl: Dpkg modules are not yet a public API
There were no tags set.
Package: dpkg-dev
Severity: wishlist
Please find attached a patch which implements setting a set of
compiler flags for a build; this was first announced in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00090.html
Now simpliefied to just use the CFLAGS/CFLAGS_APPEND naming by Colin
Watson.
18 matches
Mail list logo
