On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:46:33PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
However I'm also convinced that:
- a source package should be unpackable without a VCS. This means that
somehow it should contain a checkout that can be extracted with basic
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Basically, the way to do this is to do the dbs thing, I think. The
structure of the .tar.gz file would be:
- All content in the .tar.gz file is in a debian subdirectory as packed.
- debian/patches contains
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:51:12AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My point is precisely that it's *NOT* useful now.
No software is useful until it is implemented. wigpen is far from unique
in that regard.
Right, but the git/bzr stuff _is_ implemented...
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:46:33PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
However I'm also convinced that:
- a source package should be unpackable without a VCS. This means that
somehow it should contain a checkout that can be extracted with basic
tools. [1]
I don't think it's feasible to require
Hi Ian,
since you wrote the patch that Joey has been testing, can you look what's
wrong with it ?
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
---BeginMessage---
I haven't checked, but this sounds very similar to
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:25:13AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Granted my perl-fu is not that strong, and looking at the documentation,
I might have exaggerated the extent of this bug somewhat.
Could you please go into more
I'm running oabi on an i.MX27. I see errors with rm when my kernel
kernel is built with EABI+OABI. If I build without EABI, things
function normally. linux-2.6.22.6-mx kernel (from ltib).
Haven't tested with an armel runtime to see if the problem is specific
to EABI or EABI+OABI.
b.g.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:44:31PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:25:13AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Granted my perl-fu is not that strong, and
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:25:13AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Granted my perl-fu is not that strong, and looking at the documentation,
I might have exaggerated the extent of this
Frank Lichtenheld writes:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:39:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
Package: dpkg-dev
Severity: wishlist
Please find attached a patch which implements setting a set of
compiler flags for a build; this was first announced in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package dpkg debsig-verify
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debsig-verify dpkg
reassign 311843 dpkg
Bug#311843: debsig-verify: Completely breaks installation of standard sarge
packages
Bug reassigned from package `debsig-verify' to `dpkg'.
tags
11 matches
Mail list logo
