[SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Kenshi Muto
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 4174eea758751055dc36caf3941368fe12148bd9 Author: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Jul 6 18:41:12 2008 +0900 update Japanese translation diff --git a/po/ja.po b/po/ja.po index 989d367..42bc26c 100644 --- a/po/ja.po +++

[SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-101-gcf6b114

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit cf6b114b9b21840a55d5618910be6f4db1a9295c Author: Michel Lespinasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Jul 6 20:45:48 2008 +0200 Reduce dselect memory usage * dselect/baselist.cc (baselist::startdisplay): Create the pad

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Kenshi Muto wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 4174eea758751055dc36caf3941368fe12148bd9 Author: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Jul 6 18:41:12 2008 +0900 update Japanese translation Please don't start translating

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Please don't start translating the master branch until Lenny is released. It will complicate merging from one branch to the other. I'm not convinced this would be a great idea to merge po/ directories with the VCS merge facilities. I think that

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi Raphael, At Sun, 6 Jul 2008 12:23:33 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Please don't start translating the master branch until Lenny is released. It will complicate merging from one branch to the other. Sorry. I did it because I got an error when was commiting once for lenny branch. Anyway I

Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling

2008-07-06 Thread Neil Williams
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: working on dpkg reminded me that I wanted to propose a better diversion and alternatives handling for debian packages. Currently they have to be manually added and removed in the maintainer scripts. This method is prone to errors and can easily leave diversions or

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: I'm not convinced this would be a great idea to merge po/ directories with the VCS merge facilities. If we have conflicts, the merge is a pain and we should use msgmerge to merge properly both files. But if we have no conflicts (because the po

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: I'm not convinced this would be a great idea to merge po/ directories with the VCS merge facilities. If we have conflicts, the merge is a pain and we should use msgmerge to merge properly both files.

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote: It would be great to have such a script to merge all translations from another branch in the current branch. (assuming that a copy of the lenny branch is in lenny/ and a copy of master is in master/) One should not make such an assumption...

Re: [SCM] dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 1.14.20-100-g4174eea

2008-07-06 Thread Nicolas François
Hello, On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: It looks like the only hard part would be finding the *.pot file with which to msgmerge. msgmerge is not necessary. msgcat will take care of merging the two PO files. The final merge will be done by make update-po. Best

Re: Bug#483418: Not limit dpkg-divert to install but valid also for upgrade in app.

2008-07-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Thanks for the review! Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: The postrm has to do the reverse: example - if [ remove = $1 ]; then + if [ remove = $1 -o abort-install = $1 -o disappear = $1 ]; then To be really complete we should

Re: Bug#483418: Not limit dpkg-divert to install but valid also for upgrade in app.

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: Since this is Policy (even an appendix), and since the failure case is what people most frequently get wrong, I think I'd like to try to capture the whole situation. Do you think that something like this is more confusing than it's worth? I think it

Bug#395140: dselect memory usage is high

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Michel Lespinasse wrote: dselect select seems to take about 48 MB while displaying the packages, this causes a small-memory system (32MB) to go heavily into swap. A quick run with valgrind --tool=massif reveals that about 15MB are allocated by 'newpad'.

Bug#316521: dpkg: don't forget to delete directories

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
tags 316521 - patch retitle 316521 dpkg forgets shared directories containing manually generated files which are removed by postrm purge thanks The situation on this bug is a bit complicated so I'll make a summary... I took some time to read everything. First of all, Frank fixed the bulk of the

Bug#102609: dpkg: --force-confask - replace conffiles with no new version

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Henning, On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Henning Makholm wrote: This patch adds a force option to dpkg which will cause it to offer to replace a locally changed conffile with the file provided in the .deb even if the .deb's file has not changed since the current installation. I find this option

Bug#397121: unnecessary dpkg accesses to the available file

2008-07-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:55:58 -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote: Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.24 Severity: normal As reported under bug 395140, dpkg/dselect takes a lot of memory and can easily push low-memory systems to swap. Most of this memory usage is related to parsing the available

Processed: dpkg: don't forget to delete directories

2008-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 316521 - patch Bug#316521: dpkg: forgets to delete directories when purging Tags were: patch Bug#348133: dpkg: incomplete cleanup of emtpy directories Tags removed: patch retitle 316521 dpkg forgets shared directories containing manually

Processed: Re: Bug#77828: dpkg: [PATCH]: users should be able to use update-alternatives (not only root)

2008-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 77828 - patch Bug#77828: [U-A] users should be able to use u-a (not only root) Tags were: patch Bug#79292: [U-A] update-alternatives: user alternatives Bug#79941: [U-A] gnome-session: gnome-wm calls x-window-manager with full path Tags removed:

Bug#77828: dpkg: [PATCH]: users should be able to use update-alternatives (not only root)

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
tags 77828 - patch tags 77828 + wontfix thanks On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Martin Quinson wrote: Here is an (unified) patch against update-alternatives.pl as found today in the CVS. Its purpose is to allow the users to manage an alternative system on their account. I'm not really inclined to support

Bug#395140: dselect memory usage is high

2008-07-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 15:26:02 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Michel Lespinasse wrote: dselect select seems to take about 48 MB while displaying the packages, this causes a small-memory system (32MB) to go heavily into swap. A quick run with valgrind

Bug#395140: dselect memory usage is high

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Guillem Jover wrote: Seems fine to me as well, except for the few missing spaces and more than one statement on the same line. Ok, will fix before merge. On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Michel Lespinasse wrote: The attached patch helps with low-memory performance by implementing

Processed: setting package to dselect dpkg-dev dpkg, tagging 395140

2008-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33 # via tagpending # # dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Reduce memory usage of dselect by avoiding usage of a big infopad. #Thanks to Michel Lespinasse [EMAIL

Bug#395140: setting package to dselect dpkg-dev dpkg, tagging 395140

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33 # via tagpending # # dpkg (1.15.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Reduce memory usage of dselect by avoiding usage of a big infopad. #Thanks to Michel Lespinasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patch. #Closes: #395140 #

Bug#237675: [UTF-8] patch for dselect UTF-8 support

2008-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 03 Mar 2005, Changwoo Ryu wrote: If the patch is too long to be accepted for now, how about starting with replacing libncurses5 with libncursesw5? Just replacing, without touching other things, is also useful. The only problem is