On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Because they want that anyone can easily rebuild it with that option
disabled?
That is already supported using the existing DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS mechanism.
I may be confused about your mental model here, but it seems like you're
moving rules about
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we're already on that path for quite some time. If your package
uses DEB_(BUILD|HOST)_* variables, you rely on dpkg-buildpackage setting
them for you (with dpkg-architecture).
I most certainly do not rely on dpkg-buildpackage setting anything.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Because they want that anyone can easily rebuild it with that option
disabled?
That is already supported using the existing DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS mechanism.
I may be confused about your mental model here, but it seems like you're
moving rules about
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we're already on that path for quite some time. If your package
uses DEB_(BUILD|HOST)_* variables, you rely on dpkg-buildpackage setting
them for you (with dpkg-architecture).
I most certainly do not rely on dpkg-buildpackage setting anything.
4 matches
Mail list logo
