Re: (not) simplifying dpkg-shlibdeps with readelf

2010-04-26 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote: - readelf is tiny and works for all ELF targets. By contrast, multi-target objdump is large and its Debian package only supports the targets that were considered worth the trouble when it was last built. I guess you mean

Re: (not) simplifying dpkg-shlibdeps with readelf

2010-04-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Loïc Minier l...@dooz.org writes: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote: - readelf is tiny and works for all ELF targets. By contrast, multi-target objdump is large and its Debian package only supports the targets that were considered worth the trouble when it was last built.

Can the DEBIAN and SPECS subdirectories be unified? How about BIGJUJU?

2010-04-26 Thread Ignacio Valdes
The DEBIAN and and SPECS sub directories perform very similar and possibly identical functions among .deb and .rpm package managers. For the sake of saving developer time and make the two systems more compatible can a common name for these be agreed upon like for example PACK? Failing that how

Processed: unarchiving 574024

2010-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unarchive 574024 Bug #574024 {Done: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org} [dpkg-dev] /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges: dpkg-genchanges -v looks for exact version, not strictly later Unarchived Bug 574024 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: reopening 574024

2010-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 574024 Bug #574024 {Done: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org} [dpkg-dev] /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges: dpkg-genchanges -v looks for exact version, not strictly later thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#574024: /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges: dpkg-genchanges -v looks for exact version, not strictly later

2010-04-26 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
reopen 574024 thanks Hi! * Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org [2010-03-28 23:35:21 CEST]: On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: It does, at least here. Can you show me where it doesn't work as expected? Can you verify with dpkg-dev 1.15.6 from experimental too? No answer,

Bug#574024: /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges: dpkg-genchanges -v looks for exact version, not strictly later

2010-04-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: No answer, so closing for now. You told me it might be a bad pbuilder interaction on IRC. Feel free to reopen and reassign if necessary. It just happened again, and according to the build log of cowbuilder dpkg-genchanges is called properly:

Bug#574024: /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges: dpkg-genchanges -v looks for exact version, not strictly later

2010-04-26 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org [2010-04-26 16:34:47 CEST]: On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: dpkg-genchanges -sa -v1:1.6.5-1~bpo50+1 ../wesnoth-1.8_1.8-3~bpo50+1_i386.changes Still, I have changelog entries in the changes file back until to the very first one, which is

Bug#574024: /usr/bin/dpkg-genchanges: dpkg-genchanges -v looks for exact version, not strictly later

2010-04-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: From changelog of 1.15.1: * Fix dpkg-buildpackage/dpkg-genchanges to properly interpret option -v0. Closes: #475916 If that's the case please close it again with version 1.15.1 as the version fixing it. Actually I haven't tested in