The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 9dc6ea29b59050af1fd06c6c348afacc428de8f4
Author: Lars Buitinck larsm...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Apr 6 14:09:00 2011 +0200
dpkg-query(1): improve description of --search
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Here is an updated patch, that contains the following:
Each paragraph consists of a series of data fields; each
field consists of the field name, followed by a colon and
- then the data/value associated with that field. It
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8.10
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
dpkg-query(1) explains -S as:
Search for a filename from installed packages.
while it really searches for packages given a filename pattern. It also doesn't
include the word own which I've frequently tried to use to find this
tag 621066 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #621066 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=9dc6ea2
---
commit 9dc6ea29b59050af1fd06c6c348afacc428de8f4
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011, Lars Buitinck wrote:
dpkg-query(1) explains -S as:
Search for a filename from installed packages.
while it really searches for packages given a filename pattern. It also
doesn't
include the word own which I've frequently tried to use to find this option.
RH == Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
RH On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
RH (Or edit /var/lib/dpkg/status to add the missing field if you really want a
RH dirty hack to shut up dpkg.)
OK, I'll do that. What should I put where?
RH Put a line Architecture: all in the set
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The change is very old, not many users will be affected by this.
Guillem, what do you think? Should we silence the warning due to this?
I am not Guillem :) but I think the ideal thing would be a way for the
user to (perhaps explicitly) update the status db by
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I am not Guillem :) but I think the ideal thing would be a way for the
user to (perhaps explicitly) update the status db by inserting an
architecture.
Why ?
1/ It concerns packages which have not been touched since 2004 or packages
which were
8 matches
Mail list logo
