On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:02, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Even then, as I stated on my initial mail, if we ignore the
> cross-grade case, let's consider the situation of a system with just a
> i386 essential package set, where an amd64 apt (and needed dependencies)
> have just been installed. The noti
Hello,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Gianluca Ciccarelli wrote:
> I've read dpkg-maintscript-helper's man page. We want some commands in
> the script, invoked by the maintainer scripts always as:
> dpkg-maintscript-helper \
> -- "$@"
>
> that executes differently according to the value of the variable
This e-mail has been sent due to an upload to Ubuntu that contains Ubuntu
changes. It contains the difference between the new version and the
previous version of the same source package in Ubuntu.Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:33:28 +0100
Source: dpkg
Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdp
Hello dpkg-ers,
Thanks for the comments so far, they were really useful.
I start to see some light. I report on my ideas to let you know that I'm
working on it, and to get some feedback, if possible.
On 2011/12/07 08:05AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[...]
>Basically you must ensure that the director
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:02:36AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 23:46:35 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:29, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 18:15:12 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > >> dpkg --remove libc6 # remov
5 matches
Mail list logo
