* Guillem Jover:
> On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 14:33:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Julian Andres Klode:
>> > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:32:02PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >> It seems that “apt upgrade” clears “apt-mark hold” (in buster, so apt
>> >> 1.8.2 or thereabouts). APT does not
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 02:33:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:15:03 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > Adding more hurdles does not help.
> > > I think this is a hurdle we do not need.
> >
> > To me, a one-line change in packaging seems like a quite small hurdle
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi!
On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 07:29:26 +0100, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: normal
> In line 547 of /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package.pm syserror()
> instead of syserr() is called.
>
> cp($src, $dst)
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #976249 [dpkg] dpkg: /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package.pm call
syserror() instead of syserr()
Added tag(s) pending.
--
976249: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976249
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 02:33:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:15:03 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > Adding more hurdles does not help.
> > > I think this is a hurdle we do not need.
> >
> > To me, a one-line change in packaging seems like a quite small hurdle
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #977240 [dpkg] dpkg-query --showformat='${db-fsys:Files}' incompatible with
buster
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
977240: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977240
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Hi!
On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 00:27:39 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: important
> The command
> dpkg-query --show --showformat='${db-fsys:Files}
> displays an extra spurious first line:
>
> (Reading database ...
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 01:25:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I moved a configuration file kali.conf from the speech-dispatcher
> package to the speech-dispatcher-kali package (as well as others, but
> let's keep that example only).
>
> The thing is: speech-dispatcher does not depend on
>
On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 14:33:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Julian Andres Klode:
> > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:32:02PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> It seems that “apt upgrade” clears “apt-mark hold” (in buster, so apt
> >> 1.8.2 or thereabouts). APT does not install recommended packages
* Julian Andres Klode:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:32:02PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> It seems that “apt upgrade” clears “apt-mark hold” (in buster, so apt
>> 1.8.2 or thereabouts). APT does not install recommended packages
>> which are marked as held even if new packages with new
10 matches
Mail list logo
