.conf, where some plugins or
library path is coded in a configuration file.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
alled with --no-await by reverse
dependencies, to save time during upgrades. This does not go without
problems, and some identified reverse dependencies have to run
update-python-modules -p by hand. Anyway it will probably go away during
the wheezy cycle.
Cheers,
--
.'
guess it would be better to work around it in dpkg, wouldn’t it?
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
o could a dpkg maintainer give an explanation
about what changed and how it could trigger this issue?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
clone 501866 -1
reassign -1 perl-modules
retitle -1 Circular dependency between perl and perl-modules
thanks
Le jeudi 16 octobre 2008 à 14:33 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Random note: A first step to enhance the situation could be to remove the
> circular dep
> between perl and perl-modules
retitle 501866 dependencies not always installed correctly in prerm/upgrade
phase
reassign 501866 dpkg
severity 501866 important
thanks
Le jeudi 16 octobre 2008 à 10:11 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
> On 2008-10-15 17:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Frankly, I’m tempted to reassig
postinst already.
> -Original Message-
> From: Josselin Mouette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 04:36
> To: Higgins, Paul; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#501866: Missing dependancy - libpango1.0-common.prerm uses
> defoma-app in pkg defoma
&g
Le mercredi 12 mars 2008 à 10:01 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Guillem Jover writes ("Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also,
> triggers)"):
> > I'd like to clarify few more things, which have been brough up the past
> > few days. Even if I don't usually accept open invitations to flamefest
On ven, 2008-02-22 at 21:55 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > What please is the benefit of unnecessarily reordering dependencies
> > and leaving everyone on tenterhooks as to whether it will change
> > installation outcomes? (If this has already been explai
Le mercredi 01 février 2006 à 11:02 -0600, Joe Wreschnig a écrit :
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:16 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mardi 31 janvier 2006 à 16:08 -0600, Joe Wreschnig a écrit :
> > > The immediate problem: PyGTK encourages other Python modules to use its
> &
ms to read the .pydeps file, which still has to be written by the
maintainer. It then relies on the .pylibs of the package you depend
upon, which has to guess when the ABI can break in the future.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`.
s that
in this case, dpkg won't update it when upgrading the package.
Can one of the dpkg gurus confirm this is expected behavior?
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rite a directory
with a symlink (in the newer version of the package), it fails silently
and leaves an empty directory instead of the symlink. To test that, see
e.g. how libpng2 upgrades from the testing to the unstable version.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
13 matches
Mail list logo
