Am Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:41:36PM +0200 schrieb Emanuele Rocca:
> Hey Moritz,
>
> On 2022-10-26 08:20, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > I think this should rather be applied early after the Bookworm
> > release (and ideally we can also finish off the necessary testing
>
Am Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:48:05AM +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> I don't think the issues presented by Florian were ever resolved, so
> my concerns in https://bugs.debian.org/918914#15 would still apply,
> even though Ubuntu has enabled this, but they have a different set of
> architectures.
I
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.19.2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: security
>
> Hello GCC Maintainers!
>
> It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the
> -fstack-clash-protection flag to our default hardening posture.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
I think we need a lintian check to gain some traction.
Already implemented in 2.5.23 (#711193)[1].
Thanks! Seems I was fooled by outdated lintian results in the PTS.
It didn't list an error for ploop, while running lintian
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Is the evaluation order of GCC options properly specified, i.e. is there
a guarantee that -Os overrides the previous -O2
Yes.
(From the manual:
If you use multiple -O options, with or
5 matches
Mail list logo
