Hi Guillem,
GPL-2+ is fine for any of my modifications.
Best Regards,
—
Nicolas
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 5:39 PM Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi Joey and Nicolas!
>
> Long time ago the Debconf::Gettext [O] module got imported into the dpkg
> code base [I] with some modifications from Nicolas. The curr
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:55:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Why not inject the english version in the Translation file for all missing
> translations? That way you download only one Translation file and you have
> the usual behaviour. And you can see programmatically that it's not
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11841 March 1977, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> >> which should be easy enough to output. When such an output file is
> >> configured, the descriptions should no longer get written to the
> >
Hi Jörg,
(I'm adding dpkg. See the original mail there:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-l10n-devel/2009-August/000507.html)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:47:46AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> [...]
> It will also mean changes to apt-ftparchive, so lets get to the apt
> maintainers:
>
Hello Norbert,
Sorry, I forgot to report my findings.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 01:36:35PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mo, 16 Mär 2009, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> > I will try to review update-info-dir next week.
>
> That would be great, please use the version from
Hello Norbert,
Sorry for not answering before and thanks a lot for your work on this
topic.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> Time line:
> - inform the maintainers of info-browsers about the fact that they
> should now depend on install-info
> - upload texin
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:01:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> It looks like the only hard part would be finding the *.pot file with
> which to msgmerge.
msgmerge is not necessary. msgcat will take care of merging the two PO
files.
The final merge will be done by make update-po.
Best
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:16:49AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> I don't have much problem with roff manpages. Also if they are currently
> considered not readable, that could be improved as well, as an
> alternative. Something else to consider is the po4a interaction.
I don't have much
Hi again,
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:08:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> On Die, 17 Apr 2007, Nicolas François wrote:
> > + Changes in texinfo
> >- the info package (or a new install-info package) replaces
> > dpkg's install-info
&
Hi Norbert,
Just two additional points for the record.
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:39:29AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Debian --section regexp title
This option takes two arguments, which can be a pain for getopt.
And this usage could be confusing. The GNU install-info can also accept
tw
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:48:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Mit, 16 Mai 2007, Karl Berry wrote:
> > To repeat what I told Norbert back when we were discussing this, I don't
> > think a Perl implementation of install-info will work for GNU.
>
> AFAIUnderstand the perl woul
Hello Ian,
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:41:38AM -0400, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Well, I don't know if anyone is still interested in this since there was zero
> response to my previous mails, but here's a python version. It actually runs
> a little bit faster than the perl one.
There are still int
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:47:34AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode writes ("Re: Plans for Lenny's install-info"):
> > Make it a new install-info package. All info viewers should depend on the
> > package providing install-info and update-info-dir; 'info' isn't the only
> > info viewe
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:04:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Have you considered whether the new dpkg triggers feature currently
> being discussed in another thread in debian-dpkg might be helpful ?
> It's intended to be used for this kind of thing. Of course you may
> prefer to press ahead w
[Initially sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], now forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
As promised, I'm bringing back this issue after the release of Etch.
texinfo maintainer's CCed.
Goals
=
* Replace dpkg's install-info by the GNU's install-info
* Ease the recovery of a corrupted info dir fil
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:04:14AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> Is it possible to reduce the memory use of dselect?
There are some patches by Michel Lespinasse on:
http://bugs.debian.org/395140
Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:11:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> --- orig/policy.sgml
> +++ mod/policy.sgml
> @@ -2716,7 +2716,13 @@
> sort earlier than all the non-letters and so that a tilde
> sorts before anything, even the end of a part. For example,
> the follo
Hi Esteban,
I had a look at the testsuite.
It basically fulfill my requirements:
* I'm able to read the results of the testsuite
* I'm able to write tests
Just a few things (not really related to the test environment, but more on
the current tests)
* can you mention the dependencies of the
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:23:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> BTW, with the changes to scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl, does something fix
> the dpkglibdir and pkgdatadir paths when installing this script?
Yes, the Makefile fixes all the dpkglibdir and pkgdatadir variables during
the build.
So
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > There has also been, IIRC, some exchanges with Ian Jackson. Probably
> > more could be done here.
>
> I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
> Ian's Breaks support merged in
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:02:38AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
>
> Hi, I'd like to call attention to a specific bug which seems fairly
> bite-size in nature, and has possibly gone unfixed only due to being
> hidden amongst the many other bugs in the BTS
>
> URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:55:28PM -0700, Micah J. Cowan wrote:
> (originally sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; I gather that didn't go through).
>
> I notice that Mike Stone's bug regarding GNU's "new" multiple
> dir-section format (#180127) has gone untouched for a very long time.
>
> In the meantime
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:08:30PM +0900, KISE Hiroshi wrote:
>
> I am trying update the translation of Japanese man pages.
[...]
> Please tell me how to change encoding Japanese man pages.
>
> 1. modify man/ja/Makefile.am only
> 2. modify all man/po4a/*/*.cfg
> 3. 1 and 2
> 4. others
Only
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:28:34PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Are there any people with extensive outstanding patches to dpkg
> including particularly dependency algorithm changes ? I ask because
> the Breaks patch is likely to be quite large and I want to avoid
> conflicts.
Not my
Hello,
I'm keeping in CC the people who participated in the previous discussions:
* GNU's install-info upstream
bug-texinfo at gnu.org
Karl Berry
Eli Zaretskii
* Debian's texinfo maintainer
Norbert Preining
* debhelper (dh_installinfo) maintainer
Joey Hess
* dpkg maintainers
Hi,
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 07:50:22PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Karl!
>
> On Son, 21 Mai 2006, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> > What I think has to be done for --section is:
> > * detect if there are 2 arguments to the --section option
> > * detect if
Hello,
Just to keep you informed, as every one seems to agree on using the GNU
instal-info in Debian, the plan (discussed a little bit at DebConf) is to
first patch install-info to support the dpkg's install-info options:
i.e. mostly the --section and maybe --remove-exactly (maybe the
behavior of
Hello,
The patch has been committed (it's quite big, so you won't receive the
notification for revision 338).
I tested it by building the package with and without and comparing the
content of the debian directory.
Kind Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Hello Ian,
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:14:17PM -0700, you wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am also quite frustrated with the bugs in install-info and the
> continuing fork. But I really don't like the GNU version either (it
> seems to still do nothing about aligning the descriptions, for
> instance),
I
Hi,
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:35:51AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> Maybe others could post here if and when they will be there and if they
> would like to invest time in hacking on dpkg. I know I could also
> extract this information from the particpants list on the debconf page,
> but ch
Hello,
dpkg's install-info has some bugs and limitations.
There were plans to switch to the GNU's texinfo after Sarge. Do you think
it can still be done?
I started thinking about what would involve such a transition:
* check what is missing/incompatible in GNU's install-info
* contact info's m
31 matches
Mail list logo
