On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:59:31PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Package: debsig-verify
>> Version: 0.23+b2
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: patch
>
>> Updating our derived distro from bu
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:18:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi Guillem,
>
>Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
>or so. Looking now...
And I can confirm that your changes work here for our system too.
Thanks!
--
Steve McIntyre, C
Hi Guillem,
Sorry, I've been swamped with other stuff then ill for the last week
or so. Looking now...
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:22:08AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 23:59:31 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 15:30:24 +, Steve
Package: debsig-verify
Version: 0.23+b2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hey Guillem,
Updating our derived distro from bullseye to bookworm, we've moved on
from 0.23 to 0.28. We're using subkeys for signing our debs, and that
no longer works. I can see that the change you've made to no longer
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 08:36:16PM +, Wookey wrote:
>On 2023-11-11 18:57 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Fri, 2023-10-27 at 20:17:21 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:29:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
32 as far as
>I'm aware. I'd suggest enabling the feature only on armhf/armel for the
>time being.
Are either of those ports (armeb/arm64ilp32) actually useful / alive
at this point?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane
hen maybe we might find some help from
Wookey or Emmanuel (who should both be reading this list!).
>(I think at least the issue with wine should be solved now with commit
>https://salsa.debian.org/wine-team/wine/-/commit/51f48d3e6c04cef760610d14ba5f368e7f2baf7a)
Nod.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:14:09PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 12:32:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm working on a project where inline signatures on Debian-style
>> packages would be very useful, so I've started playing with debsigs
>&
to stay
compatible if that's possible.
Can you give me some advice here please?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
< Aardvark> I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be
handing rope-creating factories for users to hang mu
: trustdb created
gpg: Good signature from "Steve McIntyre " [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 8363 C3DB 2B16 5A8C 8EB7 A6E3 3E44 B9BF 5EC6 F
az? and
> not have to update the dep each time libfoo appears on a new
> arch. (apply argument to longer recursive chains)
Hmmm. What happens if a build-dep is transiently not available? How
can you guarantee controllable, predictable behaviour?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:42:26PM +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
>On 02/02/2017 02:30 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Dropping the -nostdlib argument to the gcc call inside sonames2elf
>> makes a difference - it'll add libc6 to the mix and force the output
>> to match the system you
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 05:10:14AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 15:34:04 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Please don't go down that route, the ABI flags are intended to save
>> people from that. I'm curious what's going wrong with libgsm1 he
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:03:13PM +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
>On 02/01/2017 04:34 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Please don't go down that route, the ABI flags are intended to save
>> people from that. I'm curious what's going wrong with libgsm1 here
>> such that we'r
worried about EABIv4, does the logic of the dpkg checker not
match the checks we added in glibc itself?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Mature Sporty Personal
More Innovation More Adult
A Man in Dandism
Powered Midship Specialty
sion_type is indeed
>handled independently for control (in udpkg.c's dpkg_unpackcontrol) and
>for data (dpkg_dounpack).
>
>> Would there be any objections to this?
>
>Bottom-line from a d-i point of view: having both compression in sync by
>default shouldn't change anything on our sid
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 02:47:20AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 20:34:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I still have my backup of the VM image at the time, so it should be
possible to try upgrading it using snapshot.d.o from that time too, if
it's likely to be useful
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:30:51PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:56:48 + Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
This is reproducible on demand \o/
I realised that the VM image had a few unneeded packages, so I did
.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
severity 634961 important
retitle 634961 testsuite fails if not built using fakeroot
thanks
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:56:12AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: minor
[ severity minor as armhf isn't a release architecture yet
Building dpkg, I'm seeing test
it would be useful ? Do you have comments and suggestions ?
I'm uncomfortable with the idea of (even more?) build-time package
settings being hidden away outside of debian/control. :-/
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
I suspect most samba developers
in
Debian that you'd like to ask or tell me about. By all means, talk to
me about them - I see it as part of my job to listen and do what I can
to help. But please keep those separate from this survey - it'll help
me to avoid my head exploding in all directions... :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Debian
.
There is probably a lot more to say, indeed but I wanted to give you my
own views after something like 2 years lurking on dpkg development.
Great, thanks!
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anybody out there?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 23:33:48 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
While I was in Tenerife last week, I met up with Esteban
Manchado Velazquez and he told me about his ideas for a testing
framework for dpkg. To me as a rank outsider, this sounds like a cool
idea, but he
surprisingly like a patch I have on my laptop already :).
I'll see about getting somethign commited to CVS today that does this
properly.
Guys, I'd like to help - do you want me to?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a href=http://www.einval.com/steve
/usr/include/stdlib.h
/usr/include/unistd.h
/usr/include/aio.h
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a href=http://www.einval.com/steve/My home page/a
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, +--
Tongue-tied twisted, Just
26 matches
Mail list logo
