Esteban Manchado Velázquez writes ("Re: Dpkg testing framework, take 5 (was:
Re: How are things going?)"):
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> > Is the testsuite intended to be run at build time, or manually?
>
> My initial idea was
Hi Nicolas!
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> Hi Esteban,
>
> I had a look at the testsuite.
>
> It basically fulfill my requirements:
> * I'm able to read the results of the testsuite
> * I'm able to write tests
Great :-)
> Just a few things (not real
Hi Esteban,
I had a look at the testsuite.
It basically fulfill my requirements:
* I'm able to read the results of the testsuite
* I'm able to write tests
Just a few things (not really related to the test environment, but more on
the current tests)
* can you mention the dependencies of the
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> [...]
> I bet for lack of time... all the dpkg developers that I know are
> reasonable and wouldn't want to throw away the work of someone else if he
> has taken care to ask for regular review of his work.
OK, thanks for y
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> Hi people!
>
[...]
> As I was the one who talked to Steve, I think I should say something :-)
> The thing that worried me the most was the silence after my proposals or
> questions on the testing framework. I assume that we mostly agree
Hi people!
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:40:55AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >thanks for the interest,
>
> *grin* I was just a little worried things had gone quiet; I've been
> watching the list for a while. But you all seem happy enough with
> where things are at the moment, and that's cool.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
