* Guillem Jover ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 03:29]:
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 21:58:39 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 22:35:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Carry on :-)
Ok, there has been one last commit to svn, and I'd like approval
before the planned upload for today.
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 21:58:39 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 22:35:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Carry on :-)
Ok, there has been one last commit to svn, and I'd like approval
before the planned upload for today. Attached the diff. And here's
both changelogs entries.
Esteban Manchado Velázquez writes (Re: Dpkg testing framework, take 5 (was:
Re: How are things going?)):
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
Is the testsuite intended to be run at build time, or manually?
My initial idea was manually, mostly because it fits
Guillem Jover writes (Re: How are things going?):
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 22:35:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Carry on :-)
Ok, there has been one last commit to svn, and I'd like approval
before the planned upload for today. Attached the diff. And here's
both changelogs entries.
I'm
Hi Nicolas!
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
Hi Esteban,
I had a look at the testsuite.
It basically fulfill my requirements:
* I'm able to read the results of the testsuite
* I'm able to write tests
Great :-)
Just a few things (not really
Hi Esteban,
I had a look at the testsuite.
It basically fulfill my requirements:
* I'm able to read the results of the testsuite
* I'm able to write tests
Just a few things (not really related to the test environment, but more on
the current tests)
* can you mention the dependencies of
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[...]
I bet for lack of time... all the dpkg developers that I know are
reasonable and wouldn't want to throw away the work of someone else if he
has taken care to ask for regular review of his work.
OK, thanks for your
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 22:35:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Carry on :-)
Ok, there has been one last commit to svn, and I'd like approval
before the planned upload for today. Attached the diff. And here's
both changelogs entries.
debian/changelog:
* Require POSIX inside subprocerr in
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
Hi people!
[...]
As I was the one who talked to Steve, I think I should say something :-)
The thing that worried me the most was the silence after my proposals or
questions on the testing framework. I assume that we mostly agree
Nicolas François writes (Re: How are things going?):
The first patches were applied in the dpkg's repository.
This means that the svn version should support packages using Breaks (I
mean not reject them, but they will not use the content of these fields).
I need to check that the final version
Russ Allbery writes (Re: How are things going?):
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brendan O'Dea writes (Re: How are things going?):
Merging changes to dpkg from Ubuntu to Debian seems daft. Why have two
repositories?
Debian and Ubuntu sometimes have different views about things
Matt Taggart writes (Re: How are things going? ):
Maybe it's time that dpkg become a separate upstream project?
I think Debian should continue to regard itself as dpkg upstream.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think overall, Debian needs a proper conversation about revision
control systems and source package formats.
I think Debian is going to continue using a wide variety of different
revision control systems as fit the feelings of individual developers and
Steve McIntyre writes (Re: How are things going?):
Christian Perrier wrote:
There has also been, IIRC, some exchanges with Ian Jackson. Probably
more could be done here.
OK... Ian, do you have any comments/suggestions to make at this point?
Well, I've become more interested in dpkg recently
Brendan O'Dea writes (Re: How are things going?):
Merging changes to dpkg from Ubuntu to Debian seems daft. Why have two
repositories?
Debian and Ubuntu sometimes have different views about things and I
don't think either would be happy necessarily using the same branch.
But I agree
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brendan O'Dea writes (Re: How are things going?):
Merging changes to dpkg from Ubuntu to Debian seems daft. Why have two
repositories?
Debian and Ubuntu sometimes have different views about things and I
don't think either would be happy necessarily
Ian Jackson writes...
Brendan O'Dea writes (Re: How are things going?):
Merging changes to dpkg from Ubuntu to Debian seems daft. Why have two
repositories?
Debian and Ubuntu sometimes have different views about things and I
don't think either would be happy necessarily using the same
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:40:07AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 16:51:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:59:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Since Breaks field here means doesn't complain about the Breaks
field,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:45:44AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
Ian's Breaks support merged in, [...]
Merging changes to dpkg from Ubuntu to Debian seems daft. Why
Hi people!
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:40:55AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
thanks for the interest,
*grin* I was just a little worried things had gone quiet; I've been
watching the list for a while. But you all seem happy enough with
where things are at the moment, and that's cool.
I'd
Steve Langasek wrote:
Since Breaks field here means doesn't complain about the Breaks field,
rather than honors the Breaks field, these changes look ok.
As far as *implementing* Breaks, I don't think a new feature of that level
should be introduced during a freeze.
Couldn't it be
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:59:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Since Breaks field here means doesn't complain about the Breaks field,
rather than honors the Breaks field, these changes look ok.
As far as *implementing* Breaks, I don't think a new feature of that level
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 16:51:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:59:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Since Breaks field here means doesn't complain about the Breaks field,
rather than honors the Breaks field, these changes look ok.
Argh, I should
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 23:33:48 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
How is dpkg development going atm? I know it's not necessarily a good
indicator of activity, but I've not seen much happening on this
list.
Kind of frozen right now, I had a list of stuff I wanted to get done
for etch, but due to
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:13:23 +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
Ian's Breaks support merged in, especially since in my limited
understanding it's already present in
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:13:23PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
Ian's Breaks support merged in, especially since in my limited
understanding it's already present in Ubuntu and presumably being used
there. That doesn't
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:51:26AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
When Scott decided to lower his involvment in March or April, he
handed the maintenance to a couple of DD's who, at some moment,
involved themselves in dpkg maintenance:
-Frank Lichtenheld
-Guillem Jover
-Brendan O'Dea
-myself
I
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
Ian's Breaks support merged in, [...]
Merging changes to dpkg from Ubuntu to Debian seems daft. Why have two
repositories?
Pick one, either Debian's or Ubuntu's, I
Christian Perrier wrote:
When Scott decided to lower his involvment in March or April, he
handed the maintenance to a couple of DD's who, at some moment,
involved themselves in dpkg maintenance:
-Frank Lichtenheld
-Guillem Jover
-Brendan O'Dea
-myself
Speaking for myself, I was mostly handling
Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 23:33:48 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
While I was in Tenerife last week, I met up with Esteban
Manchado Velazquez and he told me about his ideas for a testing
framework for dpkg. To me as a rank outsider, this sounds like a cool
idea, but he was
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 04:23:00 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So I've unblocked it after reviewing the changelog.
Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:09:26PM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
I've created a diff[2] with the new commited stuff and removed all
autogenerated things (I've not removed
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:23:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
BTW, with the changes to scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl, does something fix
the dpkglibdir and pkgdatadir paths when installing this script?
Yes, the Makefile fixes all the dpkglibdir and pkgdatadir variables during
the build.
Some
So, I have a couple of questions: Who (if anybody) is working on dpkg
at the moment? Is more help needed at the moment?
When Scott decided to lower his involvment in March or April, he
handed the maintenance to a couple of DD's who, at some moment,
involved themselves in dpkg maintenance:
Christian Perrier wrote:
There has also been, IIRC, some exchanges with Ian Jackson. Probably
more could be done here.
I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
Ian's Breaks support merged in, especially since in my limited
understanding it's already present in Ubuntu
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Christian Perrier wrote:
There has also been, IIRC, some exchanges with Ian Jackson. Probably
more could be done here.
I'm rather worried that there's been no apparent progress on getting
Ian's Breaks support merged in,
35 matches
Mail list logo
