Small nitpick. Thru is a correct simplified spelling of through. It might
sound more correct to spell it through though, so I guess the change is
fine.
But then I'm not a native speaker...
Thru for through is rare in idiomatic US English. It looks either archaic
or like an intentional
Hi!
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 18:32:36 +0200, Omar Campagne wrote:
diff -rupN man/dpkg.1 mannew//dpkg.1
-additional options set on the command line, and thru this file descriptor,
+additional options set on the command line, and through this file descriptor,
Small nitpick. Thru is a correct
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes:
Hi!
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 18:32:36 +0200, Omar Campagne wrote:
diff -rupN man/dpkg.1 mannew//dpkg.1
-additional options set on the command line, and thru this file descriptor,
+additional options set on the command line, and through this file
Hi,
On Sat, 22 May 2010, Omar Campagne wrote:
There is also this strange thing on line 379 in the file man/dpkg.1.
\fBhold\fP:
Process packages even when marked hold.
I guess its --force-hold there. Didn't include it in the patch.
No, it's fine, the --force part is omitted, it's implicit
Hello:
I finally finished the revision, which took me way longer than
expected..
Before sending the po to the spanish list, I would be grateful if anyone
could apply the patch (minor typos) as well as to trigger an update of
the pot/po files so I can catch any new changes done to the manpages,
5 matches
Mail list logo
