Accepted dpkg 1.15.10 (source amd64 all)

-By: Guillem Jover Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules Closes: 746306 Changes: dpkg

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #262

Hi! On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 14:09:49 +0200, Jenkins Team at Grml wrote: > See > -- > Started by remote host 2001:41c8:1000:21::21:21 > Building in workspace > U

Re: stable update of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles

Hi! On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 12:35:19 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:29:39AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Much of our infrastructure code comes from unpackaged projects (?), > > which makes this an awkward requirement, I guess it's the price of

Re: Bug#747261: apt: Please add support for cross-architecture conflicts

Hi! On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 15:23:42 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:57:27AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:03:50PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:22:00PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > | # apt-cache show

Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages

Hi! On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 15:56:14 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Aurelien Jarno , 2014-05-19, 13:28: > > > So following your way, it would be exactly the same for libc6:sparc. > > > > > > libc6-i386 also provides /lib/ld-linux.so.2

Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards

Hi! On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 22:04:48 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Johannes Schauer [140522 13:30]: > > Debian policy 11.1.1 [1] and the associated footnote [2] allow > > architecture wildcards of the form os-any and any-cpu. Apt seems to > > equal "cpu" with "debian architecture" which is not

Re: Commit mails to debian-dpkg-cvs mailing list dropped somewhere

Hi! On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 19:12:11 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 23:33:43 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > We had: > > > > :0fhw > > * ^Subject: *\[SCM\] dpkg's main repository > > * ^X-Git-Refname > > > > I replace

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #262

Hi! On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 11:27:36 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Guillem Jover [Sat May 17, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0200]: > > On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 14:09:49 +0200, Jenkins Team at Grml wrote: > > > See <http://jenkins.grml.org/job/dp

Accepted dpkg 1.17.10 (source amd64 all)

: Guillem Jover Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules Closes: 584233 731530 734452 746122

Re: Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes?

Hi! On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 12:46:12 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > In my build setup I'm unpacking packages in a wheezy environment, and only > then > go to a sid chroot to build those packages. This has started to cause a bit > of a > headache with a handful of packages that introduce symlin

Accepted dpkg 1.16.15 (source amd64 all)

: Guillem Jover Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules Closes: 746498 749183 Changes

Accepted dpkg 1.15.11 (source amd64 all)

-By: Guillem Jover Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules Closes: 746498 749183 Changes

Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong

Hi! On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:29:31 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > GCC 4.9 supports a new stack protector implementation, enabled via the > -fstack-protector-strong flag, which provides a better balance between > security and performance than the default implementation that we're > currently usin

Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong

Hi! On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 01:15:37 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Romain Francoise wrote: > >> I've already touched upon this elsewhere in this thread, but my personal > >> feeling is that we don't want t

Re: dpkg-source unpack failures

Hi! On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 00:04:55 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > [I'm not subscribed, please CC me on replies.] [ Please, fix your Mail-Followup-To then, it's currently being set to only the list. :) ] > FYI, according to the recent archive-wide test rebuild, a few packages > failed to unpack: >

Re: Polish translation actualisation

Hi! On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 23:11:37 +0200, Łukasz wrote: > I have actualised file pl.po and I would like to send it, but I am not sure > whether my translation is fully correct. What should I check and what should > I send. Great! You should probably get it reviewed by the Polish translation team,

Re: dpkg-source unpack failures

Hi! On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 22:19:28 +0200, David Suárez wrote: > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 19:10:03 David Suárez escribió: > > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 04:29:43 Guillem Jover escribió: > > > David, would it be possible to do a simple dpkg-source unpack run over > &

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: dpkg-binaries » i386 #226

On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 11:10:42 +0200, Jenkins Team at Grml wrote: > See I had already fixed this locally some weeks ago, will be included in my next push which should be imminent now. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Accepted dpkg 1.17.11 (source all) into unstable

747264 751021 751032 751363 752036 754127 755166 756209 756230 756526 756920 756975 757254 Changes: dpkg (1.17.11) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Switch URLs in docs and code comments from http:// to https:// if the latter is available (round two). This includes the quilt

Re: Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes?

Hi! On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 11:49:44 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 14:01:33 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > [...] > > > So it seems that wheezy's dpkg ignores this: > > > > > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > > > new file

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.11

Hi! On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 01:30:04 +, Debian buildds wrote: > * Source package: dpkg > * Version: 1.17.11 > * Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: fayrfax.debian.org > * Build log: > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=dpkg&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-binaries » i386 #228

Hi! On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 08:49:52 +0200, Jenkins Team at Grml wrote: > See > I: Building the package > W: no hooks of type A found -- ignoring > I: Running cd tmp/buildd/*/ && env PATH="/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin" > dpkg-buil

Re: [PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Remove stackprotectorstrong arch blacklist

Hi! On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 10:17:22 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > As of gcc-defaults 1.130 all architectures have moved to GCC 4.9, so we > can remove the architecture blacklist for stackprotectorstrong. > > diff --git a/scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Debian.pm b/scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Debian.pm > index 5223

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Including file signatures in .deb packages]

Hi! I think perhaps you might have meant to send this to the debhelper maintainers? Otherwise here's some comments. On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 12:57:38 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > We're looking to include file signatures in the different package > formats (eg.rpm, deb) and install them as 'security.ima

Re: [PATCH] Make Dpkg::Source::Archive use tar --format=gnu

Hi! On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 18:02:48 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote: > Explicitly instruct Dpkg::Source::Archive to use the gnu format when > creating archives. Some versions of tar (specifically on openSUSE >= 12.2) > have a different default tar format. This change makes the archive > creation more consi

Accepted dpkg 1.17.12 (source all) into unstable

) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Only build the compatibility selinux code if libselinux is available or the user requested it. Also fixes build failures on non-Linux systems. Closes: #757637 * Documentation: - Add a short description to each virtual field in dpkg

Re: propagating the value of the build-profiles field to Packages and Sources files

Hi! On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 16:05:57 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > I have not managed to solve this issue in a satisfactory manner and am too > embarrassed to show what I came up with to people who actually know how to > write perl :D > > Thus I created bug#758191 to keep track of this issue. T

Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes

Hi! On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 15:34:09 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > I'm unable to get dpkg-source to see that I have changed files in a > python source package format 3.0 (quilt): > > dpkg-source: info: there are no local changes to record > > No matter what I seem to do inside the json-schema-vali

Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes

Hi! On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 14:43:47 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.17.11 > Severity: important > Control: submitter -1 Neil Williams > On 2014-08-15 17:49:53, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 15:34:09 +0100, Neil Williams wr

Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes

On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 15:11:23 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Yeah, thanks, had already fixed this yesterday, but when I got time to > prepare the release was quite late and I was too tired to operate > correctly. :) Will be uploading now. Actually, later today, as I've to run ou

Accepted dpkg 1.17.13 (source all) into unstable

(1.17.13) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Remove unbalanced trailing single-quote in dpkg-deb error message. Reported by Trần Ngọc Quân . * Remove architecture blacklist from hardening build flag option stackprotectorstrong. Thanks to Romain Francoise . * Documentation

Re: Why is dpkg trying to write a file '//..dpkg-tmp'?

Hi! On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:38:21 -0400, sepero...@gmx.com wrote: > I'm having a problem with dpkg installing packages, but first I need to > explain my setup a bit. > > I have a failover system setup as follows on my machine. […] > So now onto my problem- When I try to install software, I get

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Running maintscripts for a different architecture

Hi! On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 14:53:16 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Because these root filesystems usually are built for an architecture > (instruction set) that's incompatible with the build system's CPU, dpkg's > habit of chrooting into the 'instdir' before running maintscripts (if > the --roo

Re: Bug#761219: debian-policy: document versioned Provides

Hi! On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 21:57:57 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > dpkg 1.17.11 and apt 1.0.7 recently implemented support for versioned > provides. From the dpkg changelog: > > * Add versioned Provides support: > - Add a new dpkg --assert-versioned-provides command. > - Packages can provide

Re: xattrs support

Hi! On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 13:44:03 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 12:12 +0400, Dmitry Falko wrote: > > I have a question on support xattrs in dpkg-dep. As far as I know in > > version 1.27.1 (Ubuntu 14.04) supports the creation of tar archives > > preserving extended attribute

Re: [PATCH] Add --cmdpart to filter processes by argv elements.

Hi! On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 22:29:10 +0200, Clemens Fruhwirth wrote: > The user can supplies a list of strings by using --cmdpart multiple > times, such as > > $ start-stop-daemon --cmdpart /usr/bin/python --cmdpart mydaemon.py > > This list is prefix-matched against the argv list of existing

Accepted dpkg 1.17.14 (source all) into unstable

759747 759754 760158 760222 760690 761025 762391 762635 762683 763000 763767 763825 Changes: dpkg (1.17.14) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Fix '--' to '-' on translations for single character options. * Correct the copyright holder in the gettext Makevar

Re: failed amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.14

Hi! On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 01:00:05 +, Debian buildds wrote: > * Source package: dpkg > * Version: 1.17.14 > * Architecture: amd64 > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: binet.debian.org > * Build log: > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=dpkg&arch=amd64&ver=1.17.14&stamp=14

Accepted dpkg 1.17.15 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 03:21:58 +0200 Source: dpkg Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect Architecture: source all Version: 1.17.15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dpkg Developers Changed-By: Guillem

Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.15

On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 02:00:02 +, Debian buildds wrote: > * Source package: dpkg > * Version: 1.17.15 > * Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: fayrfax.debian.org > * Build log: > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=dpkg&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1

Accepted dpkg 1.17.16 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:29:17 +0200 Source: dpkg Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect Architecture: source all Version: 1.17.16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dpkg Developers Changed-By: Guillem

Re: ETA for string freeze / upload planning? (especially for L10n teams)

Hi! On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 20:25:33 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > yesterday quite a few changed / added strings were added to the master > repository. > > Since the Freeze is quickly approaching I wanted to ask when the > strings stabilize, i.e. translation teams (which might require some > tim

Accepted dpkg 1.17.17 (source all) into unstable

(1.17.17) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Add dpkg-vendor, Dpkg/File.pm and Dpkg/Util.pm to the list of files with translatable strings, so that they can be translated. * Fix some typos for versioned and mentioned in comments and changelogs. * Mark for translation and

Accepted dpkg 1.17.18 (source all) into unstable

; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Handle empty minimum versions when initializing dependency versions, as the code is mapping the minimum version 0 to '' to avoid outputting useless versions. Regression introduced in dpkg 1.17.17. Closes: #764929 . [ Update

Accepted dpkg 1.17.19 (source all) into unstable

765734 765748 765781 765789 765907 765952 Changes: dpkg (1.17.19) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Bump the Breaks on devscripts to 2.14.10 due to the new dpkg-architecture command-line parsing strictness introduced in 1.17.17. Closes: #764965 * Create pidfiles even when

Re: dpkg: consumes all available RAM and crashes, during configure phase

Hi! On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 21:17:24 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > I too see dpkg hang in the configure phase and consuming all the > memory it can get. > > strace didn't yield anything useful apart from repeated brk() calls. Actually the most useful thing to use in such cases is somethin

Accepted dpkg 1.17.20 (source all) into unstable

(1.17.20) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Add a requeueing insertion protection for process_queue(). * Make sure to always switch to the next dependtry after we have made no progress for a while. Regression stemming from non future proof changes introduced with the initial

Accepted dpkg 1.17.21 (source all) into unstable

(1.17.21) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Get consistent git-style diff support, by adding (>= 2.7) to the dpkg-dev patch Depends, and a Breaks patch (<< 2.7) to libdpkg-perl. * Error out on obsolete Build-Profiles field syntax. * Document -g and -G option

Re: Bug#763829: More information on this

Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: forcemerge 763831 -1 Control: affects 763831 rsyslog On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 22:11:21 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: reassign -1 dpkg > > Am 08.10.2014 um 22:14 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > Am 08.10.2014 um 22:11 schrieb Michael Biebl: > >> Am 08.10.201

New translators workflow

Hi! As mentioned in [T], I'd rather have new translators submit .po files to the BTS, as this makes it easier to coordinate changes, handle releases, git workflows and similar. I've thus removed your user from the alioth project, but certainly not because your contributions are not welcome, they a

Re: New translators workflow

po files is the safest option. > Le mercredi 29 octobre 2014 à 03:49:59, Guillem Jover a écrit : > > I'm wondering too if translators might find it easier to work from > > something like a weblate instance, which then I could pull from time > > to time? > > I won&

Re: New translators workflow

On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 09:43:43 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > it would be nice if you could behave in a way so that I don't have the > feeling that I don't exist in the dpkg landscape for you. > FWIW (to the lurkers here) I approved

Re: Bug#767999: base-files: fails to install with pre-jessie debootstrap

Control: severity -1 serious Control: retitle -1 dpkg: Correct fix breaks bogus assumptions in old debootstrap On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 02:33:48 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (2014-11-05): > > But, from where I stand, several developers were actually checking facts > > after I che

Re: Bug#767999: base-files: fails to install with pre-jessie debootstrap

Hi! On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:30:39 +, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 8:34:49 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Control: severity -1 serious > > Control: retitle -1 dpkg: Correct fix breaks bogus assumptions in old > > debootstrap > > I'

Re: Bug#768599: man-db: cycle found while processing triggers:

Hi! On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:56:33 +, Colin Watson wrote: > Control: reassign -1 dpkg 1.17.21 > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 04:05:17PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > package: man-db > > severity: serious > > x-debbugs-cc: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org > > I'm not 100% sure the following issue

Re: Bug#768599: man-db: cycle found while processing triggers:

sign 768600 dpkg 1.17.21 > Control: forcemerge -1 768598 768600 > Control: affects -1 man-db font-config readhead-fedora > On 08/11/14 17:38, Guillem Jover wrote: > >On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:56:33 +, Colin Watson wrote: > >>On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 04:05:17PM +, Holger

Re: [PATCH] extended attributes support

Hi! On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 14:33:00 +0300, Dmitry Falko wrote: > We have already discussed the support of extended attributes. I did > not wait for "concrete plans and code." And try to make it by myself. > xattrs manifest file in DEBIAN dir. you can dump xattr to this file by > getfattr -d. When d

Re: 1.17.21 on OS X

Hi! On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 23:12:48 +, Dominyk Tiller wrote: > I'm trying to compile the latest dpkg, 1.17.21 on OS X, but keep running > into this persistent error. It could be expected given the relative > newness of this release, but thought I'd kick the configure process > upstream for a be

Re: 1.17.21 on OS X

On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 00:36:42 +, Dominyk Tiller wrote: > That did indeed seem to be the trick. I wondered why the build process > was suggesting ';' were missing, but I shrugged it off as being too > simple a fix, heh. "My bad" on that. > > That does indeed get me further, although I've run i

Re: 1.17.21 on OS X

Hi! On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 00:48:08 +, Dominyk Tiller wrote: > It's not as perfect as having access to actual physical or full virtual > machines, and it seems to mandate using Github which is a pain for some, > but Travis is fairly useful for cross-platform testing. Travis can > handle multipl

Re: Bug#766758: apt: does not process pending triggers

Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:41:25PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > This should probably be considered an RC bug, but I'll let the apt > > maintainers deal with that. I've bumped it to serious now for both, if you disagree, please lower the one on your end. > Every libapt-ba

Re: Bug#766758: apt: does not process pending triggers

Hi! On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 11:43:02 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Did not touch trigger stuff for a while, let's see if I catched up what > happens here: > > 2014-11-15 00:28, Guillem Jover: > > [...] > > Only apt seems to be affected. dselect properly uses “

Re: Status on dpkg for Jessie

Hi! On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 18:36:45 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Do you have an ETA on the next upload of dpkg (and if there is anything > blocking it)? Yes, it's waiting on readahead-fedora, waiting in the DEFERRED queue, to be able to add the correct Breaks, in case the maintainer override with

Accepted dpkg 1.17.22 (source all) into unstable

768485 768599 768852 769119 769211 769843 770280 771237 771255 771256 Changes: dpkg (1.17.22) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Add version introducing --ctrl-tarfile in dpkg-deb(1) man page. * Bump minimal version for dir_to_symlink and symlink_to_dir commands to 1.17.14

Re: dpkg-deb "OutofBounds"/"global-buffer-overflow" vulnerability

Hi! On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 00:43:06 +1100, Joshua Rogers wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.17.22-1 > Tags: bug The correct address so submit bug reports is sub...@bugs.debian.org. > Using AddressSanitizer I have found an Out-of-Bounds(?) vulnerability in > dpkg. > > The vulnerable code is in l

Re: dpkg-deb "OutofBounds"/"global-buffer-overflow" vulnerability

On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 15:14:58 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 00:43:06 +1100, Joshua Rogers wrote: > > Package: dpkg > > Version: 1.17.22-1 > > Tags: bug > > The correct address so submit bug reports is sub...@bugs.debian.org. Just to clarify th

Re: Bug#766375: lintian: false positive with arch-qualified build-depends

Hi! On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 14:53:25 +, Wookey wrote: > +++ Niels Thykier [2014-11-04 07:10 +0100]: > > I am looking for documentation rather than code to reverse-engineer. > > Without any documentation clarifying how these relations interact, we > > will end up with 3+ implementations each doin

Re: Bug#770627: dbus: Please (consider) switch(ing) to no-await triggers

Hi! On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 20:23:28 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: tags 771989 + moreinfo > > On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 at 16:39:31 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On 2014-12-04 09:11, Simon McVittie wrote: > [see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770627#70 for full > analysis]

Re: proposal: "debian/purge"

Hi! On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:19:11 +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > While adopting package "cruft", I found that an objective of original[1] > author ajt has never been reached. Yeah, this is currently a deficiency in dpkg, and should be integrated into it properly. > This is a new, scaled down

Re: Bug#770627: dbus: Please (consider) switch(ing) to no-await triggers

Hi! On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 14:01:51 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-12-05 05:20, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Given this, the only options seem to be to possibly change the > > --force-configure-any default to enabled (I'll try to test if this > > helps in the dbus s

Re: Bug#770448: reassigning to dpkg ("Setting up libpam-modules-bin (1.1.8-3.1) hangs forever with dpkg using 100% cpu")

Version: 1.17.22 On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 13:43:36 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-12-07 12:50, Holger Levsen wrote: > > control: severity -1 serious > > control: reassign -1 dpkg > > reassigning to dpkg, as this is the hanging process here. Several people > > have > > now reported they have

Re: understanding dpkg trigger cycles

Hi! On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 22:35:01 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > I figured out that I must have a misunderstanding with respect to trigger > cycles. Let me express my current understanding so that you can point out > where > I got it wrong. Lets limit this to file triggers and exclude noawait

Re: Bug#769609: apt: does not process pending triggers

Hi! On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 18:39:05 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:28:07AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Sure, although the current apt behavior goes against the written > > triggers spec, where apt/aptitude even have their own section. :) > &g

Re: Bug#769609: apt: does not process pending triggers

Hi! On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 08:50:23 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Reasoning: I just tried the following sequence: > > dpkg -i trigdepends-interest_1.0_all.deb triggerable-interest_1.0_all.deb > > # ^ dependency ^ interest /usr/share/doc > > d

Re: Stepping down as Swedish translator

Hey Peter! On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 09:23:25 +0100, Peter Krefting wrote: > After fifteen years almost to the day (the first commit lists 1999-12-09 for > the initial version), I am stepping down as the Swedish translator of Dpkg. > There are several other good Swedish translators involved in the Deb

Re: understanding dpkg trigger cycles

[ CCed d-release. TL;DR: josch has created a list of packages that can generate trigger cycles (13), I'm filing bug reports. ] Hi! On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 13:51:16 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > thanks a lot for your further explanations and clarifications! Well, thanks a lot for doing the ana

Re: understanding dpkg trigger cycles

Hi again! On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 13:51:16 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Based on this understanding I wrote a script which does the following: > > 1. calculate the set of packages A which declare an "interest" or > "interest-await" file trigger (no explicit triggers) in their > DEBIAN/

Re: preinst: get new pkg version to check for downgrade

Hi! On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 19:43:47 +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote: > When preinst is called with $1 = "upgrade", $2 is set with old > version. How should I get programmatically the new version (the one > being currently installed), to compare with "dpkg --compare-versions". The new version is always i

Accepted dpkg 1.17.23 (source all) into unstable

772841 772965 Changes: dpkg (1.17.23) unstable; urgency=low . [ Guillem Jover ] * Use a matching group instead of ${^MATCH} in s/// in dselect build script. * Skip tar extractor tests if tar is not GNU tar >= 1.27. * Reset the trigger cycle tracking on unsatisfied dependencies dur

Re: Bug#774124: Unable to update dbus to 1.8.12-3

Hi! On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 10:18:16 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 29/12/14 06:46, Erwan David wrote: > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent processing triggers for dbus: > > dbus depends on libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.7.6); however: > > Package libdbus-1-3:amd64 is not configured yet. > > > > dpkg: er

Re: dpkg-repack: Fix for paths containing spaces

Hi! On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 19:10:15 +0100, Asger Hautop Drewsen wrote: > I have attached a patch that fixes dpkg-repack to copy installed > files containing spaces. This is perl (not a shell script), and the quoting is not necessary, so the patch is a no-op. > Currently it doesn’t do anything to

Re: preinst: get new pkg version to check for downgrade

Hi! On Thu, 2014-12-25 at 01:04:08 +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote: > 2014-12-25 0:59 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover : > > On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 19:43:47 +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote: > >> When preinst is called with $1 = "upgrade", $2 is set with old > >> version. How

Re: gitweb breaks apache upgrade

Control: unmerge -1 Control: reopen -1 Control: affects -1 - gitweb src:git Control: reassign -1 gitweb 1:2.1.4-2 Control: forcemerge 774803 -1 Hi! Giving it back. :) On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 16:54:19 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Erwan David wrote[1]: > > >> dpkg: cyc

Re: gitweb breaks apache upgrade

Hi! On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:07:14 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > In this case though, it seems switching to interest-noawait is the > > correct fix, because gitweb just wants to be notified when the > > apache2-maintscript-helper program appears to

Re: preinst: get new pkg version to check for downgrade

, Andrey Utkin wrote: > 2015-01-07 17:32 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover : > > Well as mentioned above you (almost?) never need to know the new > > version, only the old one. What would you need to do only on all > > downgrades, that you would not do also on all upgrades? > > > &g

Re: dpkg transactions

David Kalnischkies wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:24:16PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > And w/o wanting to get tiresome with this, take into account that > > frontends that use any of the dpkg --force-* options as normal course > > of action, will most probably produce inter

Re: Dpkg's perl parts on CPAN

Hi! On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 18:17:14 +, Ed . wrote: > I have a "vision" that dpkg's perl stuff will be on CPAN. Benefits: > * it can be tested during preparation for releases of perl and also releases > of EUMM > * immediate access to the results from the CPANtesters network In principle these

Re: When debian/ is symbolic link

Hi! On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 01:11:20 -0500, James McCoy wrote: > Adding dpkg maintainers since the error isn't from any > devscripts-specific code. debuild is running as a thin wrapper to > dpkg-buildpackage in this scenario. > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 07:09:16AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > >

Re: Bug#776063: dbus fails to upgrade rendering entire apt unusable

Hi! On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 17:01:34 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: tags 776063 + moreinfo I think this one should be merged with the other dbus+triggers+apt bugs. > On 23/01/15 14:43, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:07:37 -0500 Yaroslav Halchenko > > wrote: > >> Decided

Re: preinst: get new pkg version to check for downgrade

Hi! On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 20:12:00 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:55:36 +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote: > > We change database schema from time to time. We do this with scripts, > > in a way similar to dbconfig-common (but it turned out to be buggy so > >

Re: Bug#771971: dpkg hangs installing "init" during upgrade from wheezy to jessie

Hi! On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 12:30:51 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:56:48 + Steve McIntyre wrote: > > This is reproducible on demand \o/ > > > > I realised that the VM image had a few unneeded packages, so I did > > > > # apt-get remove --purge x11-common libx11-6 libx11-

Re: Bug#771971: dpkg hangs installing "init" during upgrade from wheezy to jessie

On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 14:18:03 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 12:30:51 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Just to confirm, is this correctly understood? > > > > * If you purge "x11-common libx11-6 libx11-data" before upgrading, the > >u

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #326

Hi! On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 01:51:07 +0100, Jenkins Team at Grml wrote: > See > > Changes: […] > [guillem] build: Bump gettext version to 0.19 […] > -- > Started by remote host 2001:41c8:1000:21::21:21 >

Re: dpkg versioned provides

Hi! On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 07:06:52 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > We now want to test whether dose3 supports them correctly. We think that it > *should* not be hard to do so because dose3 internally uses a cudf > representation of Debian dependencies and cudf already understands versioned > prov

Re: Bug#776063: dbus fails to upgrade rendering entire apt unusable

Hi! On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 00:45:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 at 19:04:33 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I think this one should be merged with the other dbus+triggers+apt > > bugs. > I notice that before the failing upgrade, Yaroslav had dpkg 1.17.21

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #326

Hi! On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 10:41:36 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Guillem Jover [Thu Jan 29, 2015 at 03:03:41AM +0100]: > > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 01:51:07 +0100, Jenkins Team at Grml wrote: > > > See <http://jenkins.grml.org/job/dpkg-source/326/changes> > > [..

Re: Bug#771971: dpkg hangs installing "init" during upgrade from wheezy to jessie

Hi! On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 20:34:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 09:11:57PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > >On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 14:18:03 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> > >> Adding -D7 to the dpkg call through apt's DPkg::options

Preliminary review of dpkg-genbuildinfo

Hi! Looking at . Have you seen any actual problem to warrant the «Ensure stable order of Checksums-* fields» commit? In principle the output order is preserved from the input one. And here's a quickish review of the dpkg-genbuildinfo changes, taking into account that I'm looking at this as a gen

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #326

Hey again! On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 02:40:19 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 10:41:36 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > > * Guillem Jover [Thu Jan 29, 2015 at 03:03:41AM +0100]: > > > Could the gettext and autopoint packages be upgraded to 0.19.x? > > &g

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Preliminary review of dpkg-genbuildinfo

Hi! On Sun, 2015-02-01 at 10:46:50 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Guillem Jover: > > Looking at . > > > > Have you seen any actual problem to warrant the «Ensure stable order > > of Checksums-* fields» commit? In principle the output order is > > preserved from th

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >