Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Even if it is not important for you that doesn't give you the right to ignore the problem as you did until now. We've had only one unconclusive IRC discussion, that's not really ignoring the problem. And I still believe, you're over exagerating the

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Raphael Hertzog a écrit : On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Note that this is a case where the API is supposed to be stable across architectures... can you show me what the differences are and why they are legitimate? Please show me the build-failure. FTR, here's the relevant

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Raphael Hertzog a écrit : On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Even if it is not important for you that doesn't give you the right to ignore the problem as you did until now. We've had only one unconclusive IRC discussion, that's not really ignoring the problem. And I still believe,

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Though it's worth asking ourselves if it would make sense to have an intermediary fallback between debian/*.symbols.arch and debian/*.symbols that would be debian/*.symbols.kernel. While it will fixes the problem due to the variation of the

Bug#198339: rierojen

2007-11-20 Thread Grifon Farris
Long and big dragon as a symbol of your power Mikael Puljic http://heartoward.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The issue is that some supplementary symbols are exported due to libtool working differently with C++ libs for apparently no good reasons. It is not really armel-specific (except for the fact that armel generated supplementary symbols that should

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Please read the bug log again. The supplementary symbols are not the same on the different architectures, which causes some architectures to have missing symbols compared to some others. In which case it doesn't make sense to have a common

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, On armel architecture, the symbol differences have usually been inlined softfloat symbols being exported. Which is additional symbols and would thus not break symbol checking (if I understood correctly). What is more worrying is the lack of unofficial arch information in mole. Thus

Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures

2007-11-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Raphael Hertzog a écrit : On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Please read the bug log again. The supplementary symbols are not the same on the different architectures, which causes some architectures to have missing symbols compared to some others. In which case it doesn't make sense

Bug#193934: Join our marketing team

2007-11-20 Thread brian bridgett
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. Wjavascript:checkSpamAssassin(); ðÒÏ×ÅÒËÁ SpamAssassin-ÏÍe are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal

Bug#9771: Join our marketing team

2007-11-20 Thread aloysius armond
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. Wjavascript:checkSpamAssassin(); ðÒÏ×ÅÒËÁ SpamAssassin-ÏÍe are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal

Bug#193883: Would you like to work with our team

2007-11-20 Thread arv shirl
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. Wjavascript:checkSpamAssassin(); ðÒÏ×ÅÒËÁ SpamAssassin-ÏÍe are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal

Bug#4655: Join our marketing team

2007-11-20 Thread colas evelyn
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. Wjavascript:checkSpamAssassin(); ðÒÏ×ÅÒËÁ SpamAssassin-ÏÍe are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal

Bug#202247: Create a successful career within our company

2007-11-20 Thread joseph oratio
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. Wjavascript:checkSpamAssassin(); ðÒÏ×ÅÒËÁ SpamAssassin-ÏÍe are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal

Bug#39893: Create a successful career within our company

2007-11-20 Thread howie lester
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. Wjavascript:checkSpamAssassin(); ðÒÏ×ÅÒËÁ SpamAssassin-ÏÍe are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal

Bug#452226: dpkg-dev: new dpkg-shlibdeps breaks kdebase/experimental

2007-11-20 Thread brian m. carlson
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.9 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps Justification: breaks unrelated packages (through build-essential) dpkg-shlibdeps has regressed. It now causes kdebase/experimental (3.96.0) to FTBFS with the following error messages: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:

Processed: Re: Bug#452226: dpkg-dev: new dpkg-shlibdeps breaks kdebase/experimental

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 452226 kdebase 4:3.96.0-1 Bug#452226: dpkg-dev: new dpkg-shlibdeps breaks kdebase/experimental Bug reassigned from package `dpkg-dev' to `kdebase'. retitle 452226 FTFBS due to missing dependency information Bug#452226: dpkg-dev: new

Bug#452226: dpkg-dev: new dpkg-shlibdeps breaks kdebase/experimental

2007-11-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
reassign 452226 kdebase 4:3.96.0-1 retitle 452226 FTFBS due to missing dependency information thanks Hi, On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, brian m. carlson wrote: Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.9 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps Justification: breaks unrelated packages (through