Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-08 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Jan 7, 2008 6:22 AM, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, blacklisting repositories is not something acceptable. However, before closing this bug, it makes sense to verify that dselect doesn't show packages in Suggests: or Recommends: if they don't exist according to its list

Bug#31352: Should be marked as wontfix?

2008-01-08 Thread Benjamin M. A'Lee
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:22:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Mon, 07 Jan 2008, Christian Perrier wrote: Since the Debian project apparently intends to continue distributing non-free software, should this bug be marked as wontfix? The point is not even wanting to distribute

Bug#459815: dpkg-source -x: compression is not defined in %Dpkg::EXPORT_TAGS

2008-01-08 Thread martin f krafft
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.14 Severity: important File: /usr/bin/dpkg-source piper:/tmp/cdt.mEl10063 dpkg-source -x libarchive_1.2.53-2etch1.dsc compression is not defined in %Dpkg::EXPORT_TAGS at /usr/bin/dpkg-source line 6 main::BEGIN() called at /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg.pm line 6 eval

Bug#459815: dpkg-source -x: compression is not defined in %Dpkg::EXPORT_TAGS

2008-01-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 22:21:28 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.14 Severity: important File: /usr/bin/dpkg-source piper:/tmp/cdt.mEl10063 dpkg-source -x libarchive_1.2.53-2etch1.dsc compression is not defined in %Dpkg::EXPORT_TAGS at /usr/bin/dpkg-source