On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
forcemerge 330256 454628
Bug#330256: delete obsolescent not-locally-changed conffiles
Bug#454628: obsolete conffiles are
Hello,
FWIW I rebased the patchs. Please find them attached. It looks like 2 pretty
minor bugfixes that should be safe to apply.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
From
FWIW, I just rebased Ian's patch and fixed the small conflict. It only
needs some further tweaking for the 0 = NULL changes in theory.
(But I did no tests by myself)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
From
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 28701 + pending
Bug#28701: dpkg-genchanges should compare the version numbers
There were no
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Do we have any idea of how many packages/services actually use
dpkg-buildpackage -S ?
I know a lot of people do sourceful uploads in Ubuntu (all uploads are
sourceful in Ubuntu and PPAs); I don't know of services doing it, but I
guess things like
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:17:21PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Per policy 7.6, build-deps must be available for clean; pbuilder
calls dpkg-buildpackage -S to generate a source suitable to be copied
into the build environment; by default, this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
tags 459359 + pending
Bug#459359: dpkg-gensymbols: Provide a way to rely on symbol versioning when
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:38:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
tags 354999 + pending
What change are you making? I just checked (after realizing that my
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:38:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
tags 354999 + pending
Hello,
What change are you making? I just checked (after realizing that my
bug report might have been unclear
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:02:56PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Do we have any idea of how many packages/services actually use
dpkg-buildpackage -S ?
pbuilder is probably one of the most prominent. As a matter of fact
it checks the build-deps before that though and warns if they aren't
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:38:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
tags 354999 + pending
What change are you making? I just checked (after realizing that my
11 matches
Mail list logo
