On Wed, 06 Apr 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > 2/ We can't invent the value to put in Architecture
>
> It seems likely this has been covered before, but just in case: why
> not put in the native architecture for already-installed, ancient
> packages?
It could be Architecture: all instead of the
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 1/ It concerns packages which have not been touched since 2004 or packages
> which were installed before 2004 and got removed but not purged since then
I did say "ideally". I can understand if you're not motivated to work
on it.
(That said, iiuc the above is not so
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I am not Guillem :) but I think the ideal thing would be a way for the
> user to (perhaps explicitly) update the status db by inserting an
> architecture.
Why ?
1/ It concerns packages which have not been touched since 2004 or packages
which were inst
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The change is very old, not many users will be affected by this.
>
> Guillem, what do you think? Should we silence the warning due to this?
I am not Guillem :) but I think the ideal thing would be a way for the
user to (perhaps explicitly) update the status db by ins
> "RH" == Raphael Hertzog writes:
RH> On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
RH> (Or edit /var/lib/dpkg/status to add the missing field if you really want a
RH> dirty hack to shut up dpkg.)
>> OK, I'll do that. What should I put where?
RH> Put a line "Architecture: all" in the set of
Hello,
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> Package: libmimelib1
> Status: deinstall ok config-files
I did some code archeology to try to find out an explanation of why dpkg
would have dropped that field.
And I found it: http://bugs.debian.org/228253
It got "fixed" by this commit:
c
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011, Lars Buitinck wrote:
> dpkg-query(1) explains -S as:
> Search for a filename from installed packages.
> while it really searches for packages given a filename pattern. It also
> doesn't
> include the word "own" which I've frequently tried to use to find this option.
tag 621066 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #621066 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=9dc6ea2
---
commit 9dc6ea29b59050af1fd06c6c348afacc428de8f4
Aut
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 621066 pending
Bug #621066 [dpkg] dpkg-query manpage doesn't explain -S well
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621066: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=62106
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8.10
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
dpkg-query(1) explains -S as:
Search for a filename from installed packages.
while it really searches for packages given a filename pattern. It also doesn't
include the word "own" which I've frequently tried to use to find this
10 matches
Mail list logo
