On 2012-02-13 19:46 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:27:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> popcon actually uses:
>> dpkg-query --show --showformat='${status} ${package}\n'
>> and
>> dpkg -L $pkg
>>
>> What does that give on your system?
>
> dpkg-query with those options d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package dpkg
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'dpkg'
Limit currently set to 'package':'dpkg'
> found 659782 1.16.2~wipmultiarch
Bug #659782 [dpkg] dpkg -L does not work for multi-arch foreign packages.
Bug #660015
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> I undestand that since 1.16.2 was released in between, I need
> to change the version? Attached are new versions of this patches
> with the version changed.
Yes, thank you.
Guillem, what's your opinion on the output of the --status command?
Bernhard
* Raphael Hertzog [120316 09:36]:
> Please document the fact that you added a new method in the
> corresponding section at the end of the file. ($VERSION="1.02"
> has not been released yet, otherwise you'd have to increase it
> to "1.03" and document it there)
I undestand that since 1.16.2 was re
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#663004: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #663004,
regarding dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildflags "Use of uninitialized value ..."
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661638: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #661638,
regarding dpkg-buildpackage: generate a "_all.changes" file when "-A"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658854: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #658854,
regarding dpkg-maintscript-helper, local package rebuilds and orphaned conffiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658696: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #658696,
regarding dpkg-dev: Please document the "dependencies" field in deb-shlibs(5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#656496: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #656496,
regarding dpkg-shlibdeps: message improvement
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#655411: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #655411,
regarding Compat vsnprintf implementation subject to race condition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#654626: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #654626,
regarding dpkg-dev: error in french manpage of dpkg-buildpackage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#654453: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #654453,
regarding deb-control(5) manpage says that Multi-Arch should not be used for
arch:all packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#653575: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #653575,
regarding dpkg-query: add virtual field for source package and version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#652414: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #652414,
regarding dpkg-dev: dpkg-source --commit with three arguments still requires
.orig.tar.gz
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651481: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #651481,
regarding provide external interface to query expected hardening features
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#649248: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #649248,
regarding dpkg-gensymbols: option -e is being ignored
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#648217: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #648217,
regarding dpkg-dev and libdpkg-perl could be Multi-Arch: foreign
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#648180: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #648180,
regarding dpkg-checkbuilddeps: option to check another architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#647915: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #647915,
regarding dpkg-deb: xz compression does not support extreme variants
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#646496: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #646496,
regarding German manpage says dpkg-dpkg-genchanges
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644370: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #644370,
regarding dpkg/sid FTBFS on squeeze: The 'deb.5' master file does not exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#643746: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #643746,
regarding dpkg has circular Pre-Depends on coreutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642802: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642802,
regarding Cannot configure dpkg-dev, complains about tar --warning
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642802: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642802,
regarding dpkg fails with old tar
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642802: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642802,
regarding dpkg: Requires tar 1.23 from squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642608: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642608,
regarding /usr/bin/dpkg-gencontrol: Race condition with tempfile for parallel
builds
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642473: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #642473,
regarding dpkg-gencontrol non-descriptive error message
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#427945: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #427945,
regarding dpkg-query should have a Short-Description variable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#427945: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #427945,
regarding dpkg-query --show-format should support a ${Short-Description}
variable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#229357: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #229357,
regarding dpkg: Please add support for build-arch and build-indep targets
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#367608: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #367608,
regarding [S-S-D] Make the dangers of certain options more obvious in
documentation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#229357: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #229357,
regarding dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B should UNCONDITIONALLY invoke
debian/rules build-arch
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#229357: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #229357,
regarding dpkg-buildpackage does not call build-indep or build-arch targets if
present
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#229357: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #229357,
regarding dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage -B: should call build-arch target
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#229357: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #229357,
regarding dpkg-buildpackage: support for Build-Options: build-arch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#192619: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #192619,
regarding dpkg-query --show-format should support a ${Short-Description}
variable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:17:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#192619: fixed in dpkg 1.16.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #192619,
regarding dpkg-query should have a Short-Description variable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
37 matches
Mail list logo
