Bug#672715: Failing lutimes() aborting whole unpacking

2012-06-13 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 10:14:14 +0300, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > Source: dpkg > Version: 1.16.3 > > I'm not sure if this counts as dpkg bug, or is the behavior exactly > correct (for your upstream dpkg), but reporting just for you to > consider. > > I'm using dpkg in building OpenEmbedded image. So

Bug#661538: Patch generalization and field to mark staged packages

2012-06-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, P. J. McDermott wrote: > Fair enough. I think a separate hash could address both of these points: > > sub field_get($) { > my ($field) = @_; > return $FIELDS{$field} if exists $FIELDS{$field}; > foreach my $key (keys %FIELDS_RE) { > ret

Bug#661538: Patch generalization and field to mark staged packages

2012-06-13 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2012-06-13 02:01, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It's sub-optimal. If we go that way, I would like: > > 1/ that you try direct access first, and fallback to use pattern matching > only if the direct access failed > 2/ use pattern matching only on fields that actually are patterns (i.e. > you should t

Bug#675333: dpkg-source does not minimize the architecture list (linux-any vs. explicit listing)

2012-06-13 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:55:26 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.16.3 > Severity: normal > > The building of linux-tools yielded this architecture line: > > | Architecture: linux-any alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa i386 powerpc ppc64 > s390 s390x sh4 sparc sparc64 > > Thi

Bug#674981: marked as done (dpkg-dev: support uncompressed .orig.tar)

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:03:09 +0200 with message-id <20120613110309.gc17...@gaara.hadrons.org> and subject line Re: Bug#674981: dpkg-dev: support uncompressed .orig.tar has caused the Debian Bug report #674981, regarding dpkg-dev: support uncompressed .orig.tar to be marked as done.

Bug#659026: marked as done (dpkg removes non-dpkg handled files during upgrade)

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:00:49 +0200 with message-id <20120613110049.gb17...@gaara.hadrons.org> and subject line Re: Bug#659026: lm-sensors: own sensors file removed while upgrading ( /etc/sensors.d ) has caused the Debian Bug report #659026, regarding dpkg removes non-dpkg handled f

Bug#676822: marked as done (dpkg: needs error message / help for 'Multi-Arch: allowed' packages on un-multiarched systems)

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:56:24 +0200 with message-id <20120613105624.ga17...@gaara.hadrons.org> and subject line Re: Bug#676822: dpkg: needs error message / help for 'Multi-Arch: allowed' packages on un-multiarched systems has caused the Debian Bug report #676822, regarding dpkg: nee

Bug#676822: dpkg: needs error message / help for 'Multi-Arch: allowed' packages on un-multiarched systems

2012-06-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-06-09 18:39 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote: > package: dpkg > version: 1.16.4.1 > severity: important > user: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > usertags: multiarch > > Hi, > > wine is now making use of the 'Multi-Arch: allowed' feature to provide > i386 dependencies for an amd64 virt