Bug#717137: marked as done (initscripts: Initscripts package killing bootlogd functionality?)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#716948: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #716948, regarding initscripts: Initscripts package killing bootlogd functionality? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#716948: marked as done (initscripts: Removes bootlogd conf files even if bootlogd is installed)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#716948: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #716948, regarding initscripts: Removes bootlogd conf files even if bootlogd is installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#717234: marked as done (bootlogd: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/init.d/bootlogd)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#716948: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #716948, regarding bootlogd: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/init.d/bootlogd to be marked as done. T

Bug#713020: marked as done (dpkg: Typo in spanish locale of update-alternatives)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#713020: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #713020, regarding dpkg: Typo in spanish locale of update-alternatives to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#717292: marked as done (bootlogd no longer works: misses "stop")

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#716948: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #716948, regarding bootlogd no longer works: misses "stop" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#712976: marked as done (dpkg-dev: Wrong translation of fortify in French dpkg-buildflags manpage)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#712976: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #712976, regarding dpkg-dev: Wrong translation of fortify in French dpkg-buildflags manpage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#715334: marked as done (Update Vietnamase translation)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#715334: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #715334, regarding Update Vietnamase translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#711936: marked as done (gcc -fstack-protector not yet implemented for arm64)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#711936: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #711936, regarding gcc -fstack-protector not yet implemented for arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#708607: marked as done (Undefined subroutine &main::_ called at /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/File.pm)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#708607: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #708607, regarding Undefined subroutine &main::_ called at /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/File.pm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#685096: marked as done (cputable: add mips64 and mipsel64)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#707323: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #707323, regarding cputable: add mips64 and mipsel64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#707323: marked as done (Please support mips64 and mips64el)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#707323: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #707323, regarding Please support mips64 and mips64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#710265: marked as done (libdpkg-perl: Quilt.pm fails to restore quilt patches that remove files)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#710265: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #710265, regarding libdpkg-perl: Quilt.pm fails to restore quilt patches that remove files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#708292: marked as done (manpage: French translation of description of unapply-patches option inaccurate)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#708292: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #708292, regarding manpage: French translation of description of unapply-patches option inaccurate to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#708375: marked as done (dpkg-buildflags should provides JFLAGS)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#708375: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #708375, regarding dpkg-buildflags should provides JFLAGS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#699807: marked as done (dpkg: [U-A] display for the auto mode of the same priority)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#699807: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #699807, regarding dpkg: [U-A] display for the auto mode of the same priority to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#707323: marked as done (Please support mips64 and mips64el)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#685096: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #685096, regarding Please support mips64 and mips64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#691449: marked as done (dpkg-buildflags should have an export mode for shell scripts)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691449: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #691449, regarding dpkg-buildflags should have an export mode for shell scripts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#697297: marked as done (libdpkg-perl: Dpkg::Deps::deps_parse should take build_arch option)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697297: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #697297, regarding libdpkg-perl: Dpkg::Deps::deps_parse should take build_arch option to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#680871: marked as done (dpkg-gencontrol: using substvars in the long description merges first and second paragraph)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#659814: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #659814, regarding dpkg-gencontrol: using substvars in the long description merges first and second paragraph to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#700177: marked as done (dpkg-dev: please reject native/non-native version when building native/non-native source packages)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#700177: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #700177, regarding dpkg-dev: please reject native/non-native version when building native/non-native source packages to be marked as done. This me

Bug#657627: marked as done (/usr/bin/dpkg-buildflags: dpkg-buildpackage: Manpage improvements)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#657627: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #657627, regarding /usr/bin/dpkg-buildflags: dpkg-buildpackage: Manpage improvements to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#698881: marked as done (dh_shlibdeps should not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, pass this info with a parameter to dpkg-shlibdeps)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#698881: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #698881, regarding dh_shlibdeps should not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, pass this info with a parameter to dpkg-shlibdeps to be marked as done. This means

Bug#685096: marked as done (cputable: add mips64 and mipsel64)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#685096: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #685096, regarding cputable: add mips64 and mipsel64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#659814: marked as done (dpkg-dev: substvars on Description doesn't behave as documented)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#659814: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #659814, regarding dpkg-dev: substvars on Description doesn't behave as documented to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#691745: marked as done (dpkg-buildflags should not define _FORTIFY_SOURCE with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691745: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #691745, regarding dpkg-buildflags should not define _FORTIFY_SOURCE with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#686782: marked as done ("cd /" before executing the maintainer scripts)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#686782: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #686782, regarding "cd /" before executing the maintainer scripts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#703092: marked as done (dpkg --set-selections ignores available packages never installed or removed by dpkg)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#703092: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #703092, regarding dpkg --set-selections ignores available packages never installed or removed by dpkg to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#689193: marked as done (dpkg-source: introduces noise into debdiff when single-debian-patch from VCS is used)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#689193: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #689193, regarding dpkg-source: introduces noise into debdiff when single-debian-patch from VCS is used to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#684196: marked as done (dpkg-parsechangelog: Please support parsing (compressed) changelogs of installed packages)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#684196: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #684196, regarding dpkg-parsechangelog: Please support parsing (compressed) changelogs of installed packages to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#676664: marked as done (dselect: incorrectly classifies libtinyxml2* packages)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#676664: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #676664, regarding dselect: incorrectly classifies libtinyxml2* packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#681470: marked as done (dpkg-shlibdeps: should also scan Build-Depends-Arch for minimal versions)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#681470: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #681470, regarding dpkg-shlibdeps: should also scan Build-Depends-Arch for minimal versions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#681371: marked as done (outputs parts of the error message to stdout)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#681371: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #681371, regarding outputs parts of the error message to stdout to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#162541: marked as done (upgrade does not clear a package's "hold" status?)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#162541: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #162541, regarding upgrade does not clear a package's "hold" status? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#284664: marked as done ([DPKG-PARSECHANGELOG] Option to print value of individual fields)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#284664: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #284664, regarding [DPKG-PARSECHANGELOG] Option to print value of individual fields to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#635117: marked as done (Per default do not sign if distribution is UNRELEASED)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#635117: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #635117, regarding Per default do not sign if distribution is UNRELEASED to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#163763: marked as done (dpkg: dpkg --remove doesn't alter the desired status of a package if there is nothing to do)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:03:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#163763: fixed in dpkg 1.17.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #163763, regarding dpkg: dpkg --remove doesn't alter the desired status of a package if there is nothing to do to be marked as done. This means th

Processed: Bug#708607 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 708607 pending Bug #708607 [libdpkg-perl] Undefined subroutine &main::_ called at /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/File.pm Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #708607 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Processed: Bug#711647 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 711647 pending Bug #711647 [src:dpkg] dpkg: [INTL:it] Italian translation of dpkg po4a documentation (man pages) Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #711647 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: Bug#659814 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 659814 pending Bug #659814 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: substvars on Description doesn't behave as documented Bug #680871 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-gencontrol: using substvars in the long description merges first and second paragraph Added tag(s) pending. Add

Processed: Bug#710265 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 710265 pending Bug #710265 [libdpkg-perl] libdpkg-perl: Quilt.pm fails to restore quilt patches that remove files Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #710265 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: Bug#704240 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 704240 pending Bug #704240 [dpkg] [dpkg] Update for man/po/ja.po Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #704240 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704240: http://bug

Processed: Bug#715334 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 715334 pending Bug #715334 [dpkg] Update Vietnamase translation Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #715334 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 715334: http://bugs

Processed: Bug#698881 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 698881 pending Bug #698881 [dpkg] dh_shlibdeps should not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, pass this info with a parameter to dpkg-shlibdeps Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 698881: h

Bug#712000: dpkg-dev: dpkg-architecture compares the wrong architectures when using 'gcc -m32'

On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Guillem Jover wrote: [...] > In any case I think the multilib approach is bogus, and its support > should just end. A better solution, is to use an actual cross-toolchain, > or something I was planning on posting to debian-devel is to use some > kind of fake cross toolchain in